Can you strap a dog to the top of AF1? |
For you, perhaps, but as a woman of child bearing age, the Republicans' obsession with my and every other woman's reproductive capacity is disturbing. Romney wants to cut all funding to Planned Parenthood. I don't know you, obviously, but the anti-choice people in my life are frequently the ones who think sex education teaches kids how to be sluts, believe birth control is a sin, complain about the ungodliness of abortion, and then bitch and moan that there are a certain kind of people who "keep having kids." And if you haven't met these all-star thinkers, I am very glad for you. The threat to reproductive freedom, even birth control! is at stake. And if Obama trends left, good! He's been a moderate Republican these past four years. |
A very balanced and fair post. I would add, with regard to your last statement, I agree -- it's the economy, stupid. However, I don't think that going back to policies of deregulation and tax cuts is the path back to prosperity. We've got a ways to go, but the president's record is not one to run from. We've gone from an economy shedding 800,000 jobs a month as a result of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression to one that is actually adding jobs -- and has for 29 straight months. http://www.barackobama.com/jobsrecord/ The Dow was below 8,000 at the close of the market on Jan. 20, 2009. http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/20/markets/markets_newyork/index.htm Today it's over 13,000. |
I know that it's important not to dwell on appearance and to listen to the substance of the speeches, but I found that both Michelle Obama and Ann Romney looked great delivering their speeches. It is nice to see strong, smart women who are attractive and comfortable in their skin.
Michelle's speech, however, was genius. That woman knows how to deliver a message with passion and sincerity. |
Regrettably the Republicans have made it about way more than the economy. For that grade to work, at least one party has to buy it. |
If it's the economy, stupid, Americans are pretty much evenly divided on who will do a better job with the economy: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/polling/regardless-romney-obama-candidate/2012/07/09/gIQAmGOshU_page.html |
LOL! Love this. |
+1,000,000,000! Hilarious! |
You need meds for your mood congruent delusions. Nobody is obsessed with your reproductive capacity, okay? This is not China. You are free to bear children or to have an abortion. This is the U.S.A. The year is 2012. (in case you believe you are a secret agent and you need to fix your time machine to get back to the year 2030). Psycho. |
We had 4 YEARS of nothing but words. Talk is cheap. |
So if someone doesn't like Michelle Obama, they are a racist? (this is such nonsense!) Okay, then if someone doesn't like Anne Romney, they are a bigot who hates whites and mormons. |
"So if someone doesn't like Michelle Obama, they are a racist? (this is such nonsense!)
Okay, then if someone doesn't like Anne Romney, they are a bigot who hates whites and mormons." No. When someone makes racist comments, they are a racist. |
Ann Romney's speech was completely forgettable. Michelle's speech was illustrative about her husband, while Ann's was merely filled with adjectives, not examples. I am really surprised Ann'e speechwriters did not do a better job for her. It is really Speech 101. The only thing I remember from Ann's speech was when she shouted " I love women!", which was cheesy. |
You know[i] this? |
If you can't see what's wrong with the post that some idiot wrote about Michelle Obama (i.e., that it's RACIST), then you have issues. |