Problem: New heels (5") pressing on underside of ankle bones

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This thread reeks of 40+ bitter old hags.



You'll be one too soon. It's that thing called time, you know?


I will one day be 40. But I'll never be bitter. Rather than put down a woman dressed sexily, I give her a "you go, girl!". Sad that some are so jealous that they skip right to bitchiness and envy.



I'm 42. I'm not bitter either, and I'm certainly not jealous of OP's future hammertoes, bunions, and heel spurs.

And BTW, past a certain age, a woman dressed "sexily" is pathetic. I really don't think you'd be saying "go girl" to a 70 year old woman hobbling down the street in 4 inch heels. Sexy, to me, is being agile and strong, and your movement and gait not being impeded by the shoes you choose to wear.


Yeah, you don't sound bitter at all.

Who said anything about a 70 year old hobbling anywhere? And FYI, I see plenty of fabulous seniors who wear heels and/or just look chic in general.

Sexy does not equal slutty. Only frumps and plain Jane think this way.

Have fun with your Birkenstocks and Dr. Scholl's shoes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This thread reeks of 40+ bitter old hags.



You'll be one too soon. It's that thing called time, you know?


I will one day be 40. But I'll never be bitter. Rather than put down a woman dressed sexily, I give her a "you go, girl!". Sad that some are so jealous that they skip right to bitchiness and envy.


"You go, girl?"

oh. . . That's such a pathetic, hackneyed line, PP. If you're so hip, you'd stop using it.


Is that your only response? Yeah, like I said, bitter. And probably plain and frumpy as hell.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: