Video Compilation of Sarah Palin Breathing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

Oh for pete's sake! If she can't handle "looks and tone" she has zero business running the country. You sound like a kid complaining about a multiple choice test who says it's unfair. It's freaking multiple choice. It is the fairest shake you get in school. If you can't make it past a Katie Couric "look" you don'tbelong in the job. Because God knows foreign countries don't make sure your feelings aren't hurt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

Oh for pete's sake! If she can't handle "looks and tone" she has zero business running the country. You sound like a kid complaining about a multiple choice test who says it's unfair. It's freaking multiple choice. It is the fairest shake you get in school. If you can't make it past a Katie Couric "look" you don'tbelong in the job. Because God knows foreign countries don't make sure your feelings aren't hurt.

I'd like to see Obama on the Sean Hannity show or the Rush limbaugh show. But he doesn't have the guts.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote: I'd like to see Obama on the Sean Hannity show or the Rush limbaugh show. But he doesn't have the guts.

Don't be ridiculous. Obama has been on O'Reilly and is going to be on again just before the SuperBowl. Do you think Palin has the guts to go on Maddow's show?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

Oh for pete's sake! If she can't handle "looks and tone" she has zero business running the country. You sound like a kid complaining about a multiple choice test who says it's unfair. It's freaking multiple choice. It is the fairest shake you get in school. If you can't make it past a Katie Couric "look" you don'tbelong in the job. Because God knows foreign countries don't make sure your feelings aren't hurt.

I'd like to see Obama on the Sean Hannity show or the Rush limbaugh show. But he doesn't have the guts.

Uh, the President has been on Fox already. And he didn't stammer about "gettin' back to ya".

But you know what? It doesn't matter. Palin's answers should stand on their own.

She can't answer basic questions that you and I can knock off without even thinking, like what news papers she reads. And she could not even answer questions that merely asked her to clarify her own claims about HERSELF!

If you say on your resume that you have experience in something important to a job, you would darn right expect a job interviewer to ask questions about it. Every single one of us knew that she would be asked how her experience as governor of Alaska gave her foreign policy experience. Why? Because she put it on her resume. She's a fool for not having a prepared answer.

And lastly, she really tripped up a in the Hannity interview, and that's sad because the guy was ready to carry her over the goal line. He did everything he could.

Sad, sad, sad. You can call her intelligent in a "you know there are many different kinds of intelligence" way. Yeah, your mama told you that because she wanted you to feel good about yourself. But the truth is that there is only one type of intelligence. And Palin does not have it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

Oh for pete's sake! If she can't handle "looks and tone" she has zero business running the country. You sound like a kid complaining about a multiple choice test who says it's unfair. It's freaking multiple choice. It is the fairest shake you get in school. If you can't make it past a Katie Couric "look" you don'tbelong in the job. Because God knows foreign countries don't make sure your feelings aren't hurt.

I believe you're missing my point. I didn't say anything about her handling the interview (or not). I was referring specifically to Charlie and Katie--obnoxious interviewing. Liberal, conservative, or in-between, they are supposed to be unbiased interviewers. They're not, and it showed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

Oh for pete's sake! If she can't handle "looks and tone" she has zero business running the country. You sound like a kid complaining about a multiple choice test who says it's unfair. It's freaking multiple choice. It is the fairest shake you get in school. If you can't make it past a Katie Couric "look" you don'tbelong in the job. Because God knows foreign countries don't make sure your feelings aren't hurt.

I believe you're missing my point. I didn't say anything about her handling the interview (or not). I was referring specifically to Charlie and Katie--obnoxious interviewing. Liberal, conservative, or in-between, they are supposed to be unbiased interviewers. They're not, and it showed.

Well, you call them "biased". My response is that the questions were basic information that she should have been able to handle, regardless of how Charles Gibson casts his gaze at her. She's not in high school. Being a big girl is part of running for President. If she can't stand the heat, she should get back to her reality show.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I'd like to see Obama on the Sean Hannity show or the Rush limbaugh show. But he doesn't have the guts.

Don't be ridiculous. Obama has been on O'Reilly and is going to be on again just before the SuperBowl. Do you think Palin has the guts to go on Maddow's show?

Maddow is crazy thats why her ratings are so low. Limbaugh and Hannity have massive audiences because even though they are partisan, they are civil and treat people politely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I'd like to see Obama on the Sean Hannity show or the Rush limbaugh show. But he doesn't have the guts.

Don't be ridiculous. Obama has been on O'Reilly and is going to be on again just before the SuperBowl. Do you think Palin has the guts to go on Maddow's show?

Maddow is crazy thats why her ratings are so low. Limbaugh and Hannity have massive audiences because even though they are partisan, they are civil and treat people politely.

Limbaugh is civil. Really. Are you on the same drugs he was using? Do I have to play clips from his show or is it not obvious to all that you are full of it.

[Anonymous]

O'Reilly is funny, he doesn't always take things so seriously. Olbermann is unhinged. Limbaugh and Hannity are simply mean. I don't watch Maddow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maddow is crazy thats why her ratings are so low. Limbaugh and Hannity have massive audiences because even though they are partisan, they are civil and treat people politely.

In my world, Maddow is quite sane. I can accept that as a reason for relatively low ratings.

To be honest, much as I dislike Limbough, I don't doubt his sanity, nor Hannity's, O'Reilley's, or Beck's. Can I assume you were being hyperbolic or argumentative, or do you truly think that your political views are the only ones sane people can hold. I mean that as a serious question, so I hope you'll depart for a moment from our usual feisty frame of reference to give a serious answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maddow is crazy thats why her ratings are so low. Limbaugh and Hannity have massive audiences because even though they are partisan, they are civil and treat people politely.

In my world, Maddow is quite sane. I can accept that as a reason for relatively low ratings.

To be honest, much as I dislike Limbough, I don't doubt his sanity, nor Hannity's, O'Reilley's, or Beck's. Can I assume you were being hyperbolic or argumentative, or do you truly think that your political views are the only ones sane people can hold. I mean that as a serious question, so I hope you'll depart for a moment from our usual feisty frame of reference to give a serious answer.

I'm not sure about her sexuality, it is ambigious. She is hyper-partisan. She speaks in very a complicated and conviluted manner with a high volumn of words in a high frequency and a short time period. I think it would be safe to assume she uses anti-depressants. She is a total turn-off/not entertaining/not enlightening/somewhat frightening and that is why her ratings are rediculously low. Just my opinion.

[Anonymous]

No anti-depressants or retarded sexuality here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dbb3PxYrMcs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maddow is crazy thats why her ratings are so low. Limbaugh and Hannity have massive audiences because even though they are partisan, they are civil and treat people politely.

In my world, Maddow is quite sane. I can accept that as a reason for relatively low ratings.

To be honest, much as I dislike Limbough, I don't doubt his sanity, nor Hannity's, O'Reilley's, or Beck's. Can I assume you were being hyperbolic or argumentative, or do you truly think that your political views are the only ones sane people can hold. I mean that as a serious question, so I hope you'll depart for a moment from our usual feisty frame of reference to give a serious answer.

I'm not sure about her sexuality, it is ambigious. She is hyper-partisan. She speaks in very a complicated and conviluted manner with a high volumn of words in a high frequency and a short time period. I think it would be safe to assume she uses anti-depressants. She is a total turn-off/not entertaining/not enlightening/somewhat frightening and that is why her ratings are rediculously low. Just my opinion.

Which of the pundits discussed here is NOT hyper-partisan. Limbaugh? Ha! Hannity? Olberman? Her ratings are low because liberals don't spend their free time worshipping pundits. It's flat out weird that the wingnuts just soak up this stuff. Don't you know these people are just exploiting you to make a buck, and the more they whip you into a frenzy, the more money they get?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure about her sexuality, it is ambigious. She is hyper-partisan. She speaks in very a complicated and conviluted manner with a high volumn of words in a high frequency and a short time period. I think it would be safe to assume she uses anti-depressants. She is a total turn-off/not entertaining/not enlightening/somewhat frightening and that is why her ratings are rediculously low. Just my opinion.

Her sexuality is very clear and public: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20358360,00.html

I don't think she is partisan in the sense of Fox's status as a branch of the GOP, although she certainly has a decided viewpoint.

As to the high volume of words, she actually talks much slower than Limbaugh, possibly even approaching Beck in the number of pauses she uses, although not matching his theatricality.

That you are turned off, not entertained, and frightened I can understand. That you are not enlightened is a shame, since she does a good job of providing the facts that Fox fudges.

BTW, calm down and type a bit slower; your typos are distracting.