Video Compilation of Sarah Palin Breathing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
What's your assessment of Bill, Nancy, and Hillary on their video clips?

Hillary becam Billary and that is why she lost
Nancy is an old woman and should retire

[Anonymous]

This is why she is so feared. http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/2011/01/16/2011-01-16_beautiful_men_women_have_high_iqs_too_study.html

[Anonymous]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dbb3PxYrMcs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why she is so feared. http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/2011/01/16/2011-01-16_beautiful_men_women_have_high_iqs_too_study.html

On the other hand, garden variety bimbos are not the invention of the liberal media. I suppose you have no real world experience with hot women or this would have been immediately obvious to you.

T

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why she is so feared. http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/2011/01/16/2011-01-16_beautiful_men_women_have_high_iqs_too_study.html

On the other hand, garden variety bimbos are not the invention of the liberal media. I suppose you have no real world experience with hot women or this would have been immediately obvious to you.

T

You obviously don't like her, but please . . . a garden variety bimbo?! Some people might find it easy to come up with trite descriptions for people who look like Janet Reno and Janet Napolitano as well, but it wouldn't be fair or appropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why she is so feared. http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/2011/01/16/2011-01-16_beautiful_men_women_have_high_iqs_too_study.html

On the other hand, garden variety bimbos are not the invention of the liberal media. I suppose you have no real world experience with hot women or this would have been immediately obvious to you.

T

You obviously don't like her, but please . . . a garden variety bimbo?! Some people might find it easy to come up with trite descriptions for people who look like Janet Reno and Janet Napolitano as well, but it wouldn't be fair or appropriate.

I didn't say she was a garden variety bimbo. But your point, that she is pretty therefore she is smart and liberals fear her, is moronic. Anyone with horse sense knows that not all pretty women are smart.

I'd like to see her show some actual intelligence, not some random science article that implies that she "might" be smart.

[Anonymous]

BTW liberals don't like what Sarah Palin stands for, but we LOVE the fact that she exists. She is unelectable, but she will drive the GOP crazy during the primaries. And the result will be that your nominee, who WON'T be Sarah Palin, will still be so far to the right that the general election will be hopeless.

No politician with a 30% approval rating in their own state can win a national election. I can't recall it ever happening.

[Anonymous]

I'm pretty sure Sarah Palin has more than proved she's a moron. I'd call her lots of things (most of them unprintable) but smart is never one of them.

[Anonymous]

This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why she is so feared. http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/2011/01/16/2011-01-16_beautiful_men_women_have_high_iqs_too_study.html

On the other hand, garden variety bimbos are not the invention of the liberal media. I suppose you have no real world experience with hot women or this would have been immediately obvious to you.

T

You obviously don't like her, but please . . . a garden variety bimbo?! Some people might find it easy to come up with trite descriptions for people who look like Janet Reno and Janet Napolitano as well, but it wouldn't be fair or appropriate.

I didn't say she was a garden variety bimbo. But your point, that she is pretty therefore she is smart and liberals fear her, is moronic. Anyone with horse sense knows that not all pretty women are smart.

I'd like to see her show some actual intelligence, not some random science article that implies that she "might" be smart.

I'm the one who posted about Janet R. and Janet N, but I didn't post any info about the "research." Didn't make sense to me. I don't think one excludes the other. Some have one, some both, and some neither.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

What do you read? People magazine?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

What do you read? People magazine?

"Funny," snarky comment from a US Weekly reader?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

What do you read? People magazine?

You really want to know? In no particular order: NY Times, The Economist, The Weekly Standard, The New Yorker, National Review, Wall Street Journal, Atlantic Monthly, Reuters, Slate, and Harper's. And whatever looks interesting on the internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when Sarah Palin has to answer questions from the press:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalinvideos/youtube/sarah-mania.htm

Scary. I wonder how she would ever handle conversations with foreign governments.

This video is a good reminder of the incredibly condescending looks and tone that "unbiased" interviewers like Charlie G. and Katie C. use when interviewing candidates they don't like. Regardless of Palin's responses, Charlie is so obnoxious here--since this interview, I rarely watch network news and prefer to read for info.

What do you read? People magazine?

You really want to know? In no particular order: NY Times, The Economist, The Weekly Standard, The New Yorker, National Review, Wall Street Journal, Atlantic Monthly, Reuters, Slate, and Harper's. And whatever looks interesting on the internet.

You've just listed more magazines/newspapers/websites than Palins's even heard of!