Did your student ED2 to top school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

When you are dumb af, you start pretending other people's credentials don't exist. Stanford alum here from Maryland and we also don't look down on schools just because of admissions process. Chicago and Hopkins are well respected. Maybe one day you can actually get in and not be an insecure tourist at CoHo.

Stanford admits significant portion of activist trash these days with little merit. So a dumb f like you can sneak in. Nothing to be proud of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

When you are dumb af, you start pretending other people's credentials don't exist. Stanford alum here from Maryland and we also don't look down on schools just because of admissions process. Chicago and Hopkins are well respected. Maybe one day you can actually get in and not be an insecure tourist at CoHo.

Stanford admits significant portion of activist trash these days with little merit. So a dumb f like you can sneak in. Nothing to be proud of.

lol this insecure pathetic excrement of a human continues posting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

When you are dumb af, you start pretending other people's credentials don't exist. Stanford alum here from Maryland and we also don't look down on schools just because of admissions process. Chicago and Hopkins are well respected. Maybe one day you can actually get in and not be an insecure tourist at CoHo.

Stanford admits significant portion of activist trash these days with little merit. So a dumb f like you can sneak in. Nothing to be proud of.

lol this insecure pathetic excrement of a human continues posting

Insecure? What kind of loser would claim MIT/Stanford alum trying to win an argument? It’s truly pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whoever invented ED2 was evil. It should be banned. As should be the obsession with "yield" so schools would stop playing all of these dumb games to optimize for yield to impress the idiots at USN&WR.

There are a lot of evil things in the world of college admissions and ED2 is not one of them. Think fake accommodation for 1.5 time, hiring essay writers, got in ED and preparing to back out, and got in REA/SCEA and still applying to a ton of RD schools just to massage the egos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

When you are dumb af, you start pretending other people's credentials don't exist. Stanford alum here from Maryland and we also don't look down on schools just because of admissions process. Chicago and Hopkins are well respected. Maybe one day you can actually get in and not be an insecure tourist at CoHo.

Stanford admits significant portion of activist trash these days with little merit. So a dumb f like you can sneak in. Nothing to be proud of.

lol this insecure pathetic excrement of a human continues posting

Insecure? What kind of loser would claim MIT/Stanford alum trying to win an argument? It’s truly pathetic.

only thing pathetic is for someone who didnt go to said school like you trying to use them in an argument

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

When you are dumb af, you start pretending other people's credentials don't exist. Stanford alum here from Maryland and we also don't look down on schools just because of admissions process. Chicago and Hopkins are well respected. Maybe one day you can actually get in and not be an insecure tourist at CoHo.

Stanford admits significant portion of activist trash these days with little merit. So a dumb f like you can sneak in. Nothing to be proud of.

lol this insecure pathetic excrement of a human continues posting

Insecure? What kind of loser would claim MIT/Stanford alum trying to win an argument? It’s truly pathetic.

only thing pathetic is for someone who didnt go to said school like you trying to use them in an argument

Did you even go to college? You don’t sound like a logical person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

The MIT guy who was in the lowest quartile? Hmmmm