A couple questions about studying business as an undergraduate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I view an MBA as a marker of a stagnant career. They were stuck going nowhere so they had to get an MBA.

Dumb take.

It's an advanced degree.

There is absolutely nothing advanced about an MBA. It is more or less on par with an undergrad business major.

“More or less” doing an incredible amount of work in that sentence.

Nearly half of Fortune 1000 executives have an MBA, if it’s a degree for people with “stagnant careers going nowhere” I would say it does a hell of a good job.

The executives without an MBA are the top half.

Clearly not written by an MBA. What reliable metric are you using to make such a vague, simplistic, dumb statement. "The top half" of what?

OMG. I'm not writing this to defend MBAs. I'm writing it to oppose stupidity.

No intelligent person could sit through an MBA program.

Good lord this forum is useless.

You seem like an MBA type haha.

I actually don’t have an MBA, but it’s not that hard to see that comments like “No intelligent person could sit through an MBA program” or “the executives without an MBA are the top half” are extremely stupid.

The MBA is a non-intellectual degree. An intellectual degree would be an MD, PHD, or JD. An MBA is a practical, networking, resume boosting degree. This is completely fine. However, those who get ahead in the business world without an MBA are impressive because they didn't need one. That says a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I view an MBA as a marker of a stagnant career. They were stuck going nowhere so they had to get an MBA.

Dumb take.

It's an advanced degree.

There is absolutely nothing advanced about an MBA. It is more or less on par with an undergrad business major.

“More or less” doing an incredible amount of work in that sentence.

Nearly half of Fortune 1000 executives have an MBA, if it’s a degree for people with “stagnant careers going nowhere” I would say it does a hell of a good job.

The executives without an MBA are the top half.

Clearly not written by an MBA. What reliable metric are you using to make such a vague, simplistic, dumb statement. "The top half" of what?

OMG. I'm not writing this to defend MBAs. I'm writing it to oppose stupidity.

No intelligent person could sit through an MBA program.

Good lord this forum is useless.

You seem like an MBA type haha.

I actually don’t have an MBA, but it’s not that hard to see that comments like “No intelligent person could sit through an MBA program” or “the executives without an MBA are the top half” are extremely stupid.

The MBA is a non-intellectual degree. An intellectual degree would be an MD, PHD, or JD. An MBA is a practical, networking, resume boosting degree. This is completely fine. However, those who get ahead in the business world without an MBA are impressive because they didn't need one. That says a lot.

Ok, those are entirely different arguments than the two comments I was responding to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I view an MBA as a marker of a stagnant career. They were stuck going nowhere so they had to get an MBA.

Dumb take.

It's an advanced degree.

There is absolutely nothing advanced about an MBA. It is more or less on par with an undergrad business major.

“More or less” doing an incredible amount of work in that sentence.

Nearly half of Fortune 1000 executives have an MBA, if it’s a degree for people with “stagnant careers going nowhere” I would say it does a hell of a good job.

The executives without an MBA are the top half.

Clearly not written by an MBA. What reliable metric are you using to make such a vague, simplistic, dumb statement. "The top half" of what?

OMG. I'm not writing this to defend MBAs. I'm writing it to oppose stupidity.

No intelligent person could sit through an MBA program.

Good lord this forum is useless.

You seem like an MBA type haha.

I actually don’t have an MBA, but it’s not that hard to see that comments like “No intelligent person could sit through an MBA program” or “the executives without an MBA are the top half” are extremely stupid.

The MBA is a non-intellectual degree. An intellectual degree would be an MD, PHD, or JD. An MBA is a practical, networking, resume boosting degree. This is completely fine. However, those who get ahead in the business world without an MBA are impressive because they didn't need one. That says a lot.

Ok, those are entirely different arguments than the two comments I was responding to.

Not at all.