Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Pp. Just to clarify I said iready was a higher quality form of screen time than videos, not a high quality form of education.
Videos on a screen are used for whole group, is iReady whole group? No. So you are comparing apples to oranges, it’s also not a great form of ‘differentiation.’ It’s lazy, and kids do not deserve for that to be more than a tiny slice of the differentiation pie.
As was mentioned above, kids have always finished early and needed work to fill the time until the class was done. When I was a kid, that often meant word problems on flash cards, reading in the back of the room, or extra print outs of worksheets. So in that scenario, I think iReady (or programs like it) are better. Obviously small groups and time with a teacher or other activities are great, but there will always be time when that isn't an option.
There are other things to do besides iReady if you have an early finisher. Also if the child already knows everything you have just taught what should be happening is they should be working on something a little different in the first place, then often times there’s no need for such a task.
I am a younger millennial and my teacher wouldn’t just give me sheets in the back of the room, I’d get pulled out with other kids who were ahead, among other things.
I feel parents in higher achieving schools should expect that from the school. That is why we lose kids to charter schools, who I get play by another set of rules despite being ‘public’ schools. We don’t want to focus just on the students who need the most support, we have to support them all.
And note, I’m not saying iReady is trash but it doesn’t help me differentiate.