Supreme Court allows more TPS cancellations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My only thought is how is this going to function? Will these people just get a date and have to be gone by then? Or will their status just randomly shut off?

They always had such a date. However, usually the government ignores the 'temporary' in 'temporary protected status' and keeps extending it.
The law that allows such status, also says that the status or removal of status cannot be reviewed by the courts.

Is it a law? A statute? Part of the US Code? An en Executive Order? What are we talking about here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp8d21zmm88o.amp

The supreme court voted in favor of the Trump admin to allow the end of TPS for Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans. About 530,000 people.

TPS: TEMPORARY Protected Status.

TEMPORARY, adjective; lasting for only a limited period of time; not permanent.

That is fine, if the emergencies that enabled them to be here has been lifted. They haven't.

In the meantime, there are entire towns that depend on these people to keep businesses running and society progressing. Ripping them out will shut these places down. How is that helpful to anyone?

“WHO WILL PICK THE COTTON?!?!” Democrats in 1864

WHO IS GOING TO PICK MY ORGANIC NONGMO STRAWBERRIES?!?! Democrats in 2025.

Well, considering the fact that Democrats are wealthier and more educated and gainfully employed than Republicans, the answer to your second question is: poor, white Republicans. Who is going to lose their limbs in factories with lowered safety standards? Poor, white Republicans. Who is going to work for little pay in factories? Poor, white Republicans. Because the Republicans are also the ones adding those pesky work requirements for Medicaid and guess who makes a majority of Medicaid recipients? Poor, white Republicans.

96m people in the US are on Medicaid.
43% of those are white people.
Only 28% of those are Hispanic.

https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/data-and-systems/downloads/macbis/2020-race-etncity-data-brf.pdf

That is so sweet, only to want brown people to be paid slave wages and lose limbs. What a big ole softy you are!

And I know math is hard, but considering that whites are 75% of the population and Hispanics are about 20%, you may want to check out what a "proportion" or "ratio" is. Maybe ask a wise friend or your husband.

LOL, love it! A condescending idiot. Dems have tried to improve conditions for workers, no matter their skin color. MAGA hates brown people AND workplace protections. Maybe you should read project 2025.

Importing millions of workers to compete with and depress wages of American workers is not helping working class.

Biden prioritized jobs over inflation. He left with a 4% unemployment rate. Where are these magical US workers coming from????

You can’t have it both ways. Oh, unless you’re really just racist. 😱

The government has many metrics for employment. Look at U-6.
The 4% you cite is the percent unemployed among people actively looking for work. The share of eligible workers who are looking for work has dropped substantially over 20 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My only thought is how is this going to function? Will these people just get a date and have to be gone by then? Or will their status just randomly shut off?

They always had such a date. However, usually the government ignores the 'temporary' in 'temporary protected status' and keeps extending it.
The law that allows such status, also says that the status or removal of status cannot be reviewed by the courts.

Is it a law? A statute? Part of the US Code? An en Executive Order? What are we talking about here

Immigration Act of 1990

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My only thought is how is this going to function? Will these people just get a date and have to be gone by then? Or will their status just randomly shut off?

They always had such a date. However, usually the government ignores the 'temporary' in 'temporary protected status' and keeps extending it.
The law that allows such status, also says that the status or removal of status cannot be reviewed by the courts.

Is it a law? A statute? Part of the US Code? An en Executive Order? What are we talking about here

Immigration Act of 1990

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading today with Harvard is that 30% of their student body is from China and the CCP brags that Harvard is their "Party School" and itis looked on favorably by those that go in to the mainland's government organizations after going to Harvard. Apparently, Harvard gets 70 million a year from the PRC and has a big influence on our own government with many public service programs of study.


Source is the Harvard Crimson and the Wall Street Journal.

Any truth to this?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My only thought is how is this going to function? Will these people just get a date and have to be gone by then? Or will their status just randomly shut off?

The darker ones will be violently apprehended and deported to Libya or El Salvador. I wonder how places like Springfield, OH will survive?

We cannot keep depending on poor people fleeing their poverty and war torn countries for cheap labor.

Is that the American dream? Come to America and work menial jobs for minimum wage and live in a slum.

We’ve tried raising the minimum wage, advocated for workers rights, raising taxes on the rich to support low wage workers with benefits, fought for the poor, fought for the immigrants, but the Jesus-hating Republicans have shot every effort down.

Please, your false arguments are embarrassing for you. So embarrassing that it’s making the adults uncomfortable.

The taxpayers need to supplement my slaves!!

Why should I pay them when the taxpayers can provide them snap/ebt, medical care, and subsidies for housing,
sayeth the lefties.

Oh, and my nanny can’t go back, little Oliver and Emma love Pilar.

The Orange Hitler wants to deprive me of my nanny. Nazi!!

You joke, but the people on TPS have work permits and a disruption in childcare will have a significant effect. So you want to deport them? Fine, but what is the plan to fill these gaps?

Oh, no worries. We solved that during covid. Just switch to remote schooling and parent your own kids.

[Anonymous]

Use of parole is supposed to be on a case by case basis. This was ignored by Biden(and others). Then a district judge rules Trump can't withdraw Biden's illegal grant because the withdrawal must be on a case by case basis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading today with Harvard is that 30% of their student body is from China and the CCP brags that Harvard is their "Party School" and itis looked on favorably by those that go in to the mainland's government organizations after going to Harvard. Apparently, Harvard gets 70 million a year from the PRC and has a big influence on our own government with many public service programs of study.


Source is the Harvard Crimson and the Wall Street Journal.

Any truth to this?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

Google AI says 20% from China. That still sounds like a lot. I wonder how many are graduate students vs. undergrad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading today with Harvard is that 30% of their student body is from China and the CCP brags that Harvard is their "Party School" and itis looked on favorably by those that go in to the mainland's government organizations after going to Harvard. Apparently, Harvard gets 70 million a year from the PRC and has a big influence on our own government with many public service programs of study.


Source is the Harvard Crimson and the Wall Street Journal.

Any truth to this?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

NP. I fact checked this with AI and then double checked the cited sources.

1) The claim that 30% of Harvard's student body is from China is not supported by current data. According to a recent report, international students make up 27% of Harvard's total enrollment, with China being the top country of origin among these students . However, this does not equate to 30% of the entire student body being from China.
Sources:
i. Foreign Students Make Up 27% of Harvard's Enrollment
https://www.statista.com/chart/34519/international-students-at-harvard-university/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
ii. According to the Harvard International Office, 1,282 students from China currently study at Harvard. (This means that the no. of Chinese students at Harvard is between 18-19% of the international student population at Harvard.) https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/5/29/chinese-student-visas/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

2) Regarding the assertion that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) refers to Harvard as their "Party School," there is evidence that some Chinese officials have colloquially used this term. Harvard's Kennedy School of Government has hosted numerous mid-career and senior CCP officials for executive training and postgraduate studies, leading to this informal nickname . However, this is not an official designation by the CCP.
Source:
https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-communist-party-harvard-f855112b?utm_source=chatgpt.com

3) As for funding, reports indicate that Harvard received approximately $69.9 million from Chinese sources over a certain period, making it the top U.S. university in terms of Chinese funding during that time . This figure does not necessarily equate to $70 million annually, and the exact annual amount may vary. Lastly, while Harvard has trained individuals who later took positions in various governments, including China's, the university offers public service programs of study that are open to all students. There is no direct evidence to suggest that Harvard's programs are specifically designed to influence the U.S. government on behalf of the CCP.
Source: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/4/6/foreign-donations-2022/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

So what's your real concern? What better way to "convert" people from less-than-democratic countries to the American way of life than to have them study at our universities? Did you know that Xi Jiping's only child studied at Harvard? "Xi enrolled in Harvard University in the United States in 2010, after a year of undergraduate study at Zhejiang University. She enrolled under a pseudonym and maintained a low profile. In 2014, she graduated from Harvard University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology and was thought to have returned to Beijing."

The Chinese who send their children here to study want the perceived prestige of an American education for their children. And they're not just sending them to the US. Chinese students make up the largest share of international students in Australia (the second most popular destination for Chinese students). Chinese students are the largest international student group in the UK (over r 150,000 enrolled in recent years, many drawn to prestigious institutions like Cambridge, Oxford, and LSE). And about 100,000 Chinese students study in Canada.

[Anonymous]

Are we converting them or are they converting us?

Let's clear this up first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are we converting them or are they converting us?

Let's clear this up first.

Converting us to what? Valuing education and making lots of money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading today with Harvard is that 30% of their student body is from China and the CCP brags that Harvard is their "Party School" and itis looked on favorably by those that go in to the mainland's government organizations after going to Harvard. Apparently, Harvard gets 70 million a year from the PRC and has a big influence on our own government with many public service programs of study.


Source is the Harvard Crimson and the Wall Street Journal.

Any truth to this?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

NP. I fact checked this with AI and then double checked the cited sources.

1) The claim that 30% of Harvard's student body is from China is not supported by current data. According to a recent report, international students make up 27% of Harvard's total enrollment, with China being the top country of origin among these students . However, this does not equate to 30% of the entire student body being from China.
Sources:
i. Foreign Students Make Up 27% of Harvard's Enrollment
https://www.statista.com/chart/34519/international-students-at-harvard-university/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
ii. According to the Harvard International Office, 1,282 students from China currently study at Harvard. (This means that the no. of Chinese students at Harvard is between 18-19% of the international student population at Harvard.) https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/5/29/chinese-student-visas/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

2) Regarding the assertion that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) refers to Harvard as their "Party School," there is evidence that some Chinese officials have colloquially used this term. Harvard's Kennedy School of Government has hosted numerous mid-career and senior CCP officials for executive training and postgraduate studies, leading to this informal nickname . However, this is not an official designation by the CCP.
Source:
https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-communist-party-harvard-f855112b?utm_source=chatgpt.com

3) As for funding, reports indicate that Harvard received approximately $69.9 million from Chinese sources over a certain period, making it the top U.S. university in terms of Chinese funding during that time . This figure does not necessarily equate to $70 million annually, and the exact annual amount may vary. Lastly, while Harvard has trained individuals who later took positions in various governments, including China's, the university offers public service programs of study that are open to all students. There is no direct evidence to suggest that Harvard's programs are specifically designed to influence the U.S. government on behalf of the CCP.
Source: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/4/6/foreign-donations-2022/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

So what's your real concern? What better way to "convert" people from less-than-democratic countries to the American way of life than to have them study at our universities? Did you know that Xi Jiping's only child studied at Harvard? "Xi enrolled in Harvard University in the United States in 2010, after a year of undergraduate study at Zhejiang University. She enrolled under a pseudonym and maintained a low profile. In 2014, she graduated from Harvard University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology and was thought to have returned to Beijing."

The Chinese who send their children here to study want the perceived prestige of an American education for their children. And they're not just sending them to the US. Chinese students make up the largest share of international students in Australia (the second most popular destination for Chinese students). Chinese students are the largest international student group in the UK (over r 150,000 enrolled in recent years, many drawn to prestigious institutions like Cambridge, Oxford, and LSE). And about 100,000 Chinese students study in Canada.

So we're just ignoring the widespread intellectual property theft, yuan currency manipulation, Chinese "Police Stations" in our country, injecting CCP propaganda in to our media, flooding the US with fentanyl, elite capture on our soil and especially the DC cocktail circuit, infiltrating our federal reserve, the CCP linked bioweapons lab in Reedley CA, the constant trickle of info from our National Labs to the PRC, Tiktok spying and subversion, societal destabilization AND as they call it themselves - "Death by a Thousand Cuts" (hybrid unconventional warfare)?

Just ignore it?

[Anonymous]

He may be rounding numbers in the article or he may have more accurate numbers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we converting them or are they converting us?

Let's clear this up first.

Converting us to what? Valuing education and making lots of money?

You mean through the dozens of Confucius Institutes at many of our universities? What's going on there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading today with Harvard is that 30% of their student body is from China and the CCP brags that Harvard is their "Party School" and itis looked on favorably by those that go in to the mainland's government organizations after going to Harvard. Apparently, Harvard gets 70 million a year from the PRC and has a big influence on our own government with many public service programs of study.


Source is the Harvard Crimson and the Wall Street Journal.

Any truth to this?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

NP. I fact checked this with AI and then double checked the cited sources.

1) The claim that 30% of Harvard's student body is from China is not supported by current data. According to a recent report, international students make up 27% of Harvard's total enrollment, with China being the top country of origin among these students . However, this does not equate to 30% of the entire student body being from China.
Sources:
i. Foreign Students Make Up 27% of Harvard's Enrollment
https://www.statista.com/chart/34519/international-students-at-harvard-university/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
ii. According to the Harvard International Office, 1,282 students from China currently study at Harvard. (This means that the no. of Chinese students at Harvard is between 18-19% of the international student population at Harvard.) https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/5/29/chinese-student-visas/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

2) Regarding the assertion that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) refers to Harvard as their "Party School," there is evidence that some Chinese officials have colloquially used this term. Harvard's Kennedy School of Government has hosted numerous mid-career and senior CCP officials for executive training and postgraduate studies, leading to this informal nickname . However, this is not an official designation by the CCP.
Source:
https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-communist-party-harvard-f855112b?utm_source=chatgpt.com

3) As for funding, reports indicate that Harvard received approximately $69.9 million from Chinese sources over a certain period, making it the top U.S. university in terms of Chinese funding during that time . This figure does not necessarily equate to $70 million annually, and the exact annual amount may vary. Lastly, while Harvard has trained individuals who later took positions in various governments, including China's, the university offers public service programs of study that are open to all students. There is no direct evidence to suggest that Harvard's programs are specifically designed to influence the U.S. government on behalf of the CCP.
Source: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/4/6/foreign-donations-2022/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

So what's your real concern? What better way to "convert" people from less-than-democratic countries to the American way of life than to have them study at our universities? Did you know that Xi Jiping's only child studied at Harvard? "Xi enrolled in Harvard University in the United States in 2010, after a year of undergraduate study at Zhejiang University. She enrolled under a pseudonym and maintained a low profile. In 2014, she graduated from Harvard University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology and was thought to have returned to Beijing."

The Chinese who send their children here to study want the perceived prestige of an American education for their children. And they're not just sending them to the US. Chinese students make up the largest share of international students in Australia (the second most popular destination for Chinese students). Chinese students are the largest international student group in the UK (over r 150,000 enrolled in recent years, many drawn to prestigious institutions like Cambridge, Oxford, and LSE). And about 100,000 Chinese students study in Canada.

So we're just ignoring the widespread intellectual property theft, yuan currency manipulation, Chinese "Police Stations" in our country, injecting CCP propaganda in to our media, flooding the US with fentanyl, elite capture on our soil and especially the DC cocktail circuit, infiltrating our federal reserve, the CCP linked bioweapons lab in Reedley CA, the constant trickle of info from our National Labs to the PRC, Tiktok spying and subversion, societal destabilization AND as they call it themselves - "Death by a Thousand Cuts" (hybrid unconventional warfare)?

Just ignore it?

Of course, not. I would hope that our intelligence agencies are monitoring this type of activity, whether conducted by Chinese or people of any other nationality. But how does any of this relate to Chinese studying in the US or anywhere else in the western world?