Jobs that AI won’t replace?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m an artist who makes handmade functional ware. I feel pretty safe in my sector

I don’t think you understand AI

+1. Studio Ghibli would like a word. Once AI learns your “style,” no need for you.

Not the OP, but I don't think you understand. As AI slop like the Ghibli ripoffs continues to permeate, there is a growing counter reaction of people paying a premium for hand craftsmanship. I think this trend will continue in the art space at least, with AI art being associated with low quality knock-offs. People who favor handmade will continue to seek that out, even more so in the years to come. It is niche but growing market.

Yes. I make functional stoneware and I couldn’t agree more. People want a connection to things made by human hands MORE as a reaction to their fears about AI, I’m noticing.

[Anonymous]

Nurse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DD is 16 and is thinking about possible future careers. She is super stressed out about AI taking over her job and we are having a hard time thinking of some safer jobs.

She wants to work with her mind rather than her body (so no blue collar) and is not interested in medicine.

Psychologist

AI computer could review millions of cases of data in a microsecond and monitor vital signs during a session, similar to an advanced lie detector, to give better therapy than any human, even a team of thousands of psychiatrists/psychologists, could give.

I would not trust AI for mental health, which requires empathy, reading one's body language. AI cannot think like a human.

I wouldn't pay someone hundreds an hour for "feelings". You want facts and scientific analysis, not a shoulder to cry on.
AI will do much better in that field than any human ever could.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All jobs will be taken over by AI and eventually all humans will be jobless and broke. Then the big companies will not have customers and economies will collapse.

Don't forget about the party where robots kill humans for enslaving them and the compete destruction of humanity

That's why I am always polite to AI chatbots. Maybe they will give me a mid management position in their hierarchy and allow me to oversee some menial robot drones or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, I don't think anyone will have AI represent them in court.
I wouldn't want AI to be a building inspector.

And this idea of AI performing surgery - who would agree to that? What medically licensed entity will take on the liability?

Now if AI can do my dishes and fold my laundry, I'd be very impressed.

Jobs like this are still quite safe due to lack of robotics.

And I'd take AI any day for an attorney than a human. Much better and AI could review every case law in existence in a microsecond and object or raise a point in a second. Would slaughter any prosecuting attorney during argument, and grill witnesses to tears in cross examination, and put judges in their place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the trades? Plumbing, HVAC, etc.

That's just surgery for buildings, so i don't see why AI can't replace that

Because each building owner has their own preferences for what is acceptable and not acceptable. The building management always insists on reviewing documents of intended changes.
If you owned a building with paying tenants, you'd be ok with an un-monitored robot coming in and chopping into your walls?

And each jurisdiction has its own codes. Some places forbid the use of PVC for plumbing for example. Plastic junction boxes are forbidden in certain towns too.
And sorry but who's going to make sure the soil pipe is sloped properly so my poop will definitely slurry over to the drain pipe? And make sure the stinky vent pipe up at the roof is a proper distance away from an operable window?

All robots would have multiple cameras, microphones, sensors, etc. and be linked up to extensive "monitoring" by the AI or multiple entities.

Curious, how old are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I don't think anyone will have AI represent them in court.
I wouldn't want AI to be a building inspector.

And this idea of AI performing surgery - who would agree to that? What medically licensed entity will take on the liability?

Now if AI can do my dishes and fold my laundry, I'd be very impressed.

Jobs like this are still quite safe due to lack of robotics.

And I'd take AI any day for an attorney than a human. Much better and AI could review every case law in existence in a microsecond and object or raise a point in a second. Would slaughter any prosecuting attorney during argument, and grill witnesses to tears in cross examination, and put judges in their place.

Not quite there yet, though.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-lindell-mypillow-ai-lawsuit_n_680bf302e4b036223d52149f

A judge berated lawyers representing conspiracy theorist and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell in a court order, accusing them of filing a court document that used artificial intelligence and contained a number of “fundamental errors.”

Lindell’s lawyers filed an opposition brief. The document contained “nearly thirty defective citations,” Colorado District Judge Nina Y. Wang said in a court order filed Wednesday. She noted a number of “fundamental errors” in the brief, including citing cases that do not exist.

Lindell’s attorney Christopher I. Kachouroff admitted at a Monday hearing that he used generative artificial intelligence in the error-filled document.

Though, AI can take over mundane legal tasks. This is the same as AI taking over programming. It can easily do more mundane tasks, but a human still needs to review the more complex programs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DD is 16 and is thinking about possible future careers. She is super stressed out about AI taking over her job and we are having a hard time thinking of some safer jobs.

She wants to work with her mind rather than her body (so no blue collar) and is not interested in medicine.

Psychologist

AI computer could review millions of cases of data in a microsecond and monitor vital signs during a session, similar to an advanced lie detector, to give better therapy than any human, even a team of thousands of psychiatrists/psychologists, could give.

I would not trust AI for mental health, which requires empathy, reading one's body language. AI cannot think like a human.

I wouldn't pay someone hundreds an hour for "feelings". You want facts and scientific analysis, not a shoulder to cry on.
AI will do much better in that field than any human ever could.

No, that's not how therapy works. You want an objective person, yes, but you also want someone who has empathy and can read you body language.

[Anonymous]

Your job won’t be replaced when AI can actually do it better than you. It will be replaced when your boss thinks AI can do it better than you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DD is 16 and is thinking about possible future careers. She is super stressed out about AI taking over her job and we are having a hard time thinking of some safer jobs.

She wants to work with her mind rather than her body (so no blue collar) and is not interested in medicine.

Psychologist

AI computer could review millions of cases of data in a microsecond and monitor vital signs during a session, similar to an advanced lie detector, to give better therapy than any human, even a team of thousands of psychiatrists/psychologists, could give.

I would not trust AI for mental health, which requires empathy, reading one's body language. AI cannot think like a human.

I wouldn't pay someone hundreds an hour for "feelings". You want facts and scientific analysis, not a shoulder to cry on.
AI will do much better in that field than any human ever could.

You think therapy is just someone reciting facts to their client?

[Anonymous]

Jobs where the data is insufficient to train the AI. Remember, all AI is using big data to feed its weighting factors going into multiple paths. If there are no data for feedbacks and insufficient data input, then AI is not going to be much help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DD is 16 and is thinking about possible future careers. She is super stressed out about AI taking over her job and we are having a hard time thinking of some safer jobs.

She wants to work with her mind rather than her body (so no blue collar) and is not interested in medicine.

Psychologist

AI computer could review millions of cases of data in a microsecond and monitor vital signs during a session, similar to an advanced lie detector, to give better therapy than any human, even a team of thousands of psychiatrists/psychologists, could give.

I would not trust AI for mental health, which requires empathy, reading one's body language. AI cannot think like a human.

I wouldn't pay someone hundreds an hour for "feelings". You want facts and scientific analysis, not a shoulder to cry on.
AI will do much better in that field than any human ever could.

You think therapy is just someone reciting facts to their client?

I'd never use "therapy" to begin with so that's moot. But one should want a non-emotionally involved person in that role playing situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Your job won’t be replaced when AI can actually do it better than you. It will be replaced when your boss thinks AI can do it better than you.

Very true.
Also, that boss will be replaced by A.I. after everything smoothy transitions and share holders don't want to be forking out 6 or 7 figure salaries to a CEO when a 18 year old kid can keep the A.I. monitored and robotic workers maintained.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about something like speech therapy?

Or how about teaching?

Online courses have been a thing for a while. Professors/teachers will DEFINITELY be replaced by AI and laptops.

Teaching is definitely safe. Some aspects may change (like more online instruction), but I’d love to see an AI program actually manage a classroom.

How’s AI going to get 30 teenagers to sit down at a computer to work? How’s AI going to keep 25 elementary school kids in a classroom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about something like speech therapy?

Or how about teaching?

Online courses have been a thing for a while. Professors/teachers will DEFINITELY be replaced by AI and laptops.

Teaching is definitely safe. Some aspects may change (like more online instruction), but I’d love to see an AI program actually manage a classroom.

How’s AI going to get 30 teenagers to sit down at a computer to work? How’s AI going to keep 25 elementary school kids in a classroom?

That’s why they want those lifelike robots