Why are women names Denise so nosy and annoying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And people with name Sarah, oh forget it. But Sara s are slightly better.

Sarah here. Unfortunately all Sarahs I meet bother me. I’ve thought about changing my name many times over the years. I’ve also thought about whether or not I might be a “Sarah”. Which is a scary thought.

I've known a lot of Sarah's and if I could resurrect any friendships from my past it would be two Sarah's. They were so fun to be around, funny, down to earth and honest.

I wonder if you're one of these Sarah's!

[Anonymous]

Can we talk about Stephanie? An 80s name for a now 40 year old still stuck in the 80s emotionally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is this how Trump was elected? I mean, are people really this stupid?

Yes, people really are this stupid.

Half the population has IQ below 100.
Think about what IQ 100 represents, and how all intellectual barriers to online forum access have been eliminated by modern tech.

In the weeks leading up to the election, I was stunned at the incoming predictive polls- my question being how was there even a critical mass of people who would even consider voting him in? My spouse repeated that above statement each time- not half, but MOST people have a lower than average IQ, so it shouldn't shock anyone.

And so, here we are. This post, and everyone else here, who is attributing personality characteristics to common names is really a pretty good example of the general population's level of intellect.

This does not bode well for future mankind.

I don't think your husband understands statistics.

Spouse is an economist, so yes, they absolutely do understand stats- and you are assuming a lot with regard to gender, which, of course, speaks to spouse's assertion about IQ. Thanks for proving my point, though!

PS-
The book entitled Bell Curve wasn't correct at all. It's one of the books allowed to stay at the Naval Academy after the "woke" book purge. The nation will now become even dumber.

[Anonymous]

Isn’t Jon diminutive of Jonathan, whereas John is it’s own name.

I’m sure it the land of phonetic spellings we’ve entered there are exceptions. But I don’t know I’ve ever know a given name Jon.

[Anonymous]

Also I know four Denise’s, two white, two black, one a elser millenial, one a mid Xer and two late boomers. All are very smart, practical people. All are brunette.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is this how Trump was elected? I mean, are people really this stupid?

Yes, people really are this stupid.

Half the population has IQ below 100.
Think about what IQ 100 represents, and how all intellectual barriers to online forum access have been eliminated by modern tech.

In the weeks leading up to the election, I was stunned at the incoming predictive polls- my question being how was there even a critical mass of people who would even consider voting him in? My spouse repeated that above statement each time- not half, but MOST people have a lower than average IQ, so it shouldn't shock anyone.

And so, here we are. This post, and everyone else here, who is attributing personality characteristics to common names is really a pretty good example of the general population's level of intellect.

This does not bode well for future mankind.

I don't think your husband understands statistics.

Spouse is an economist, so yes, they absolutely do understand stats- and you are assuming a lot with regard to gender, which, of course, speaks to spouse's assertion about IQ. Thanks for proving my point, though!

PS-
The book entitled Bell Curve wasn't correct at all. It's one of the books allowed to stay at the Naval Academy after the "woke" book purge. The nation will now become even dumber.

The IQ distribution is a Gaussian or normal distribution or very very close. It's centered around 100. So, "MOST" definitely do not have a lower than average IQ unless you are going to define most as a pure majority and even then I suspect the curve is skewed toward higher intelligence due to selection pressure.

[Anonymous]

Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is this how Trump was elected? I mean, are people really this stupid?

Yes, people really are this stupid.

Half the population has IQ below 100.
Think about what IQ 100 represents, and how all intellectual barriers to online forum access have been eliminated by modern tech.

In the weeks leading up to the election, I was stunned at the incoming predictive polls- my question being how was there even a critical mass of people who would even consider voting him in? My spouse repeated that above statement each time- not half, but MOST people have a lower than average IQ, so it shouldn't shock anyone.

And so, here we are. This post, and everyone else here, who is attributing personality characteristics to common names is really a pretty good example of the general population's level of intellect.

This does not bode well for future mankind.

I don't think your husband understands statistics.

Spouse is an economist, so yes, they absolutely do understand stats- and you are assuming a lot with regard to gender, which, of course, speaks to spouse's assertion about IQ. Thanks for proving my point, though!

PS-
The book entitled Bell Curve wasn't correct at all. It's one of the books allowed to stay at the Naval Academy after the "woke" book purge. The nation will now become even dumber.

The IQ distribution is a Gaussian or normal distribution or very very close. It's centered around 100. So, "MOST" definitely do not have a lower than average IQ unless you are going to define most as a pure majority and even then I suspect the curve is skewed toward higher intelligence due to selection pressure.

You see what's happening right now in our country, right? The curve is definitely not skewed toward higher intelligence. In fact, the average IQ in the US is 98, considerably lower than a lot of countries who are frankly doing a lot better than we are. Frankly, there needs to be new norming after this political debacle, because we are not looking so good.

And we can start with this thread! I mean, it's anecdotal, but this is a great example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we talk about Stephanie? An 80s name for a now 40 year old still stuck in the 80s emotionally.

I know a Stephanie and she is definitely emotionally stunted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is this how Trump was elected? I mean, are people really this stupid?

Yes, people really are this stupid.

Half the population has IQ below 100.
Think about what IQ 100 represents, and how all intellectual barriers to online forum access have been eliminated by modern tech.

In the weeks leading up to the election, I was stunned at the incoming predictive polls- my question being how was there even a critical mass of people who would even consider voting him in? My spouse repeated that above statement each time- not half, but MOST people have a lower than average IQ, so it shouldn't shock anyone.

And so, here we are. This post, and everyone else here, who is attributing personality characteristics to common names is really a pretty good example of the general population's level of intellect.

This does not bode well for future mankind.

I don't think your husband understands statistics.

Spouse is an economist, so yes, they absolutely do understand stats- and you are assuming a lot with regard to gender, which, of course, speaks to spouse's assertion about IQ. Thanks for proving my point, though!

PS-
The book entitled Bell Curve wasn't correct at all. It's one of the books allowed to stay at the Naval Academy after the "woke" book purge. The nation will now become even dumber.

The IQ distribution is a Gaussian or normal distribution or very very close. It's centered around 100. So, "MOST" definitely do not have a lower than average IQ unless you are going to define most as a pure majority and even then I suspect the curve is skewed toward higher intelligence due to selection pressure.

You see what's happening right now in our country, right? The curve is definitely not skewed toward higher intelligence. In fact, the average IQ in the US is 98, considerably lower than a lot of countries who are frankly doing a lot better than we are. Frankly, there needs to be new norming after this political debacle, because we are not looking so good.

And we can start with this thread! I mean, it's anecdotal, but this is a great example.

Are those countries voting in the US?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the people I have met named Denise are African American, well educated, and not gossipy. Sibling status unknown.

No they are not

Np yes most are.

Of the five Denise we have met, all have been Caucasian

Have you seen the Key and Peele skit about A A Ron, Balakie and De-Nice? Very funny.

LOL. That’s what I came here to post. That’s the only way I hear the name in my head now!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is this how Trump was elected? I mean, are people really this stupid?

Yes, people really are this stupid.

Half the population has IQ below 100.
Think about what IQ 100 represents, and how all intellectual barriers to online forum access have been eliminated by modern tech.

In the weeks leading up to the election, I was stunned at the incoming predictive polls- my question being how was there even a critical mass of people who would even consider voting him in? My spouse repeated that above statement each time- not half, but MOST people have a lower than average IQ, so it shouldn't shock anyone.

And so, here we are. This post, and everyone else here, who is attributing personality characteristics to common names is really a pretty good example of the general population's level of intellect.

This does not bode well for future mankind.

I don't think your husband understands statistics.

Spouse is an economist, so yes, they absolutely do understand stats- and you are assuming a lot with regard to gender, which, of course, speaks to spouse's assertion about IQ. Thanks for proving my point, though!

PS-
The book entitled Bell Curve wasn't correct at all. It's one of the books allowed to stay at the Naval Academy after the "woke" book purge. The nation will now become even dumber.

The IQ distribution is a Gaussian or normal distribution or very very close. It's centered around 100. So, "MOST" definitely do not have a lower than average IQ unless you are going to define most as a pure majority and even then I suspect the curve is skewed toward higher intelligence due to selection pressure.

You see what's happening right now in our country, right? The curve is definitely not skewed toward higher intelligence. In fact, the average IQ in the US is 98, considerably lower than a lot of countries who are frankly doing a lot better than we are. Frankly, there needs to be new norming after this political debacle, because we are not looking so good.

And we can start with this thread! I mean, it's anecdotal, but this is a great example.

People are dumber than ever before.

[Anonymous]

I saw a therapist named Denise for many years. I can honestly say she saved my life and made the lives of my children better than they would have been without me knowing her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is this how Trump was elected? I mean, are people really this stupid?

Yes, people really are this stupid.

Half the population has IQ below 100.
Think about what IQ 100 represents, and how all intellectual barriers to online forum access have been eliminated by modern tech.

In the weeks leading up to the election, I was stunned at the incoming predictive polls- my question being how was there even a critical mass of people who would even consider voting him in? My spouse repeated that above statement each time- not half, but MOST people have a lower than average IQ, so it shouldn't shock anyone.

And so, here we are. This post, and everyone else here, who is attributing personality characteristics to common names is really a pretty good example of the general population's level of intellect.

This does not bode well for future mankind.

I don't think your husband understands statistics.

Spouse is an economist, so yes, they absolutely do understand stats- and you are assuming a lot with regard to gender, which, of course, speaks to spouse's assertion about IQ. Thanks for proving my point, though!

PS-
The book entitled Bell Curve wasn't correct at all. It's one of the books allowed to stay at the Naval Academy after the "woke" book purge. The nation will now become even dumber.

The IQ distribution is a Gaussian or normal distribution or very very close. It's centered around 100. So, "MOST" definitely do not have a lower than average IQ unless you are going to define most as a pure majority and even then I suspect the curve is skewed toward higher intelligence due to selection pressure.

You see what's happening right now in our country, right? The curve is definitely not skewed toward higher intelligence. In fact, the average IQ in the US is 98, considerably lower than a lot of countries who are frankly doing a lot better than we are. Frankly, there needs to be new norming after this political debacle, because we are not looking so good.

And we can start with this thread! I mean, it's anecdotal, but this is a great example.

People are dumber than ever before.

It would appear so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it's a name from the 70s or 80s so at this juncture you're more spotting a trend with women of a certain age rather than a name.

Actually a 60s name. I know 2 and one is a bossy know it all who acts high brow when she isn’t. It’s embarrassing to see. The other is a hillbilly type with a low IQ.