Pam Bondi's brother running for DC Bar president

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes please vote and thank you OP for posting! They probably thought he could slide in under the radar. By the way, if you want something to make you despise him more, he lives near me and prominently parks his big ugly cyber truck in his driveway daily like a trophy, despite having a garage.

Uh, c’mon, that’s all you have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

[Anonymous]

Less than 9% turnout in 2024. Crazy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

If you’re a lawyer it’s all over LinkedIn. People have been posting about this for several weeks.

[Anonymous]

It's been reported that, one week into the election, turnout is a record-breaking 25%. Remember that last year was 9% for the entire election; we're just one week in! Keep it up folks.

[Anonymous]

I voted!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because I have lost my will to be nice and polite, I will say that I think he resembles the baby from the 90s tv show Dinosaurs.

Funny thing is this is one of his better photos.

He has his sister's original face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi's campaign email where he refers to his two adopted sons as "diverse" is pretty cringeworthy.

It’s deeply offensive on multiple levels.

First, it shows he is stupid. One person is not “diverse.” A group can be diverse or come from diverse backgrounds.

Second, someone must have told him that many, many times. Yet he persists because a) he is stupid and b) he likely he does not care what others think, including the children

I feel so badly for these children. Maybe Bondi and Amy Coney Barrett get together regularly to salute themselves for raising these children they clearly see as “other.”

Stranger adoption should be disqualifying from public office.

What is “stranger adoption”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

If you’re a lawyer it’s all over LinkedIn. People have been posting about this for several weeks.

I’m a lawyer and on LinkedIn everyday and haven’t seen it. Like I said, you are overestimating the people paying attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

If you’re a lawyer it’s all over LinkedIn. People have been posting about this for several weeks.

I’m a lawyer and on LinkedIn everyday and haven’t seen it. Like I said, you are overestimating the people paying attention.

I've had like ten of my friends email me or message me about it, so maybe you just don't know a lot of people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

If you’re a lawyer it’s all over LinkedIn. People have been posting about this for several weeks.

I’m a lawyer and on LinkedIn everyday and haven’t seen it. Like I said, you are overestimating the people paying attention.

I posted above that turnout so far is 25%, which is an amazing record. So, yes, people are very much paying attention.

[Anonymous]

Just saw a post from Diane Seltzer indicating that, as of 4 days ago, 22,900 people had voted. The previous high was 10,700 votes in 1990.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

If you’re a lawyer it’s all over LinkedIn. People have been posting about this for several weeks.

I’m a lawyer and on LinkedIn everyday and haven’t seen it. Like I said, you are overestimating the people paying attention.

I posted above that turnout so far is 25%, which is an amazing record. So, yes, people are very much paying attention.

Do you even hear what you are saying? 25% is AMAZING. This means most people are not paying attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

If you’re a lawyer it’s all over LinkedIn. People have been posting about this for several weeks.

I’m a lawyer and on LinkedIn everyday and haven’t seen it. Like I said, you are overestimating the people paying attention.

I've had like ten of my friends email me or message me about it, so maybe you just don't know a lot of people?

Yes that must be it. I don’t know a lot of people. Or why don’t you ask all of your colleagues to increase the denominator?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine he will win.

You are assuming people are paying attention.

If you’re a lawyer it’s all over LinkedIn. People have been posting about this for several weeks.

I’m a lawyer and on LinkedIn everyday and haven’t seen it. Like I said, you are overestimating the people paying attention.

I posted above that turnout so far is 25%, which is an amazing record. So, yes, people are very much paying attention.

Do you even hear what you are saying? 25% is AMAZING. This means most people are not paying attention.

You already sound like a sore loser, Brad.