I do. But how do I tell if others do? A person who is racist and a person who is not racist will probably both say that they make efforts to avoid biases. So how can a person tell who is racist and who isn’t? |
It’s so hard to tell what is and isn’t racism when it’s so easy to hide meanness or ill-intent and so difficult to prove genuine kindness. |
Everyone is racist, and it is hard to tell who is going to be most anti-racist or inclusive. My boss is a fairly gruff person who does not come across as remotely woke but he is a good listener who grants people autonomy after they prove themselves and I think that can promote equity. Also he is pretty big on following EEO rules and avoiding any appearance of discrimination in hiring, yeah probably what motivates him is not getting sued but I think that also prevents some issues. In contrast I have a very "woke" coworker who is terrible to work with because he thinks he is smarter than everyone and just ignores the team he is supposed to be leading and does his own thing and that is not inclusive or helpful. One sign of inclusivity is if you observe that person X says something is dumb and person Y calls them on it and person X genuinely accepts the criticism as a learning experience and thanks person Y for calling them out, then person X is possibly someone who can promote an inclusive working environment. |
I get what you're saying, PP, but that inclusivity example makes me cringe. I won't say it's dumb, because, see your example, but I wonder if person Y isn't too keen on calling out, and embarrassing, person X in order to show superiority. However, if person Y says something to person X in a respectful, non charged environment, X may be able to hear Y's feedback more clearly. |
no, turns out we arent stupid. we are aware of racism on our own w/o being told. we know bc we expeience it.q when we tell you about it we are not secretly referencing folks being mean or otherwise unpleasent
|
One can be "fairly liberal" and racist as the two are not mutually exclusive. And I think we all know examples of unqualified white managers. Maybe these managers are there bc of there logic skills |
|
Black person here. Just plain black.
In plain language, why create drama with a senior/mid level manager just to stand on your power to say "no" or a narrowly constructed pathway to yes? Rather than bring DEI (or any other acronym) into the discussion, I'd offer that your repeated "no" responses reflect a lack of trust in the manager. You lack vision for how their request just might move the needle closer to the organization reaching larger goals. Or you may be a micromanager. The problem is you, not them. Even if you don't agree with the "how" why not try saying yes and trusting the training, experience, and knowledge the person brings to the table. Tell them that they are a responsible for producing evidence of progress and goal attainment. Give clear expectations for how you will measure success.m (or what success looks like). Then say no. But repeated no's from you will not encourage collaboration or trust on either side. Your reputation for being unbearable will precede you. |
I really appreciate this thoughtful, collaborative response. In the same vein, I wonder about the difference in levels of racism between the “everyone’s racist” and the “labeled a racist.” How do you know when a person is fairly or unfairly “labeled a racist”? As a bystander, I see this periodically where someone who is trying not to be racist — NOT a Donald Trump type — more an AOC type — is accused of being racist including by upholding systemic racism. I’ve seen people take sides, the language get ugly with people trying to judge the “actual” intent with no one actually being able to tell who’s right. Even the accused is told s/he doesn’t fully know his/her actual intent. Admittedly, this has happened on adjacent teams, and I don’t know what I’d do if it happened on mine. |
Oof sorry that's happening. That sounds horribly toxic and unfortunately very common. I think people who are accusing others of having bad intent if good intent is the most likely that is really counterproductive. They should focus on impact and say "I know your intent was good but the impact was bad because XYZ". Also address the issue in a way that is compassionate to the person they are calling out. I personally think these conversations should really be one on one and then allow the person being called out to address the group afterwards if appropriate. I've seen cases where a person (usually White) gets called out in a group and then a bunch of people child in to pile on and it's really not helpful at all. What ends up happening is all the White people clam up and decide not to talk about race ever because nobody wants to go through that humiliation, and they also get very closed off to implementing racial equity in their work because they have been taught they are incapable of understanding racism and racial equity. And it's BS because BIPOC people can also be very ignorant about other people and cultures, but in these settings they can't be called out in the same way. |
I agree with you. My focus in my post was on person X, but absolutely person Y should try to be compassionate towards person X and that is often not what happens. |
This is a helpful post on a difficult topic. Thank you. |
That doesn’t always work. There may be limited resources or the proposal may be more risky than there’s controls for or someone may have had a better idea. Businesses are businesses; they don’t function if everyone can just choose their own adventure. That’s why there is leadership… |
In a previous role, anyone was free to submit ideas for new products but only 3-5 were built. That means thousands of no’s for every yes. It’s a bit of an extreme case, but it’s a clear one. We were lucky because the new product proposals were filed electronically such that no one could be accused of bias. In a different situation, I could certainly see someone whispering, “do you notice how none of the ideas came from people who are black?” |
|
Just keep focusing on team productivity, fairness and morale.
If someone is an outlier to the downside, it doesn’t matter what race or creed or gender they are, they are holding back the team and company. |
YOU are confident, that does not mean that you are not. Cold hard reality. Others would have to make this determination, not you. |