Wash Post—new editor from WSJ!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

I think that's what PP wants. Apparently the Post being independent and not a Dem cheerleader is too far right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Dems refused to acknowledge the lab leak theory for COVID. Now look at it ..it may be the most plausible story for the origins of covid out there.

Dems hated science because it was supposedly racist to claim that covid could have been leaked by the Chinese.

Research scientist here. NO. The accidental lab leak theory cannot be proven and has just as much probability of being right as the natural zoonotic transmission (cross-species infection through close association of humans with wild animals). We do not know, and will probably never know.

The media exists to sell itself and therefore be dramatic. Of course it's going to publish all sorts of nonsense on subjects it does not understand.

DP. Sounds like you like WaPo as it currently is. Not as it used to be and as it should be. The newspaper doesn't exist to sell itself - it exists to report the news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Dems refused to acknowledge the lab leak theory for COVID. Now look at it ..it may be the most plausible story for the origins of covid out there.

Dems hated science because it was supposedly racist to claim that covid could have been leaked by the Chinese.

What “evidence and facts” were the Ds not following at that time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Dems refused to acknowledge the lab leak theory for COVID. Now look at it ..it may be the most plausible story for the origins of covid out there.

Dems hated science because it was supposedly racist to claim that covid could have been leaked by the Chinese.

Research scientist here. NO. The accidental lab leak theory cannot be proven and has just as much probability of being right as the natural zoonotic transmission (cross-species infection through close association of humans with wild animals). We do not know, and will probably never know.

The media exists to sell itself and therefore be dramatic. Of course it's going to publish all sorts of nonsense on subjects it does not understand.

You must be a terrible scientist then. I suggest you read the peice that came out yesterday in the NYT that was written by a BROAD INSTITUTE scientist in how the lab leak theory is entirely plausible and the most likely explanation for COVID. You sound like you're completely ignorant to all of the scientific facts. The peice throughly trashes the idea of zoonotic transmission with tons of hard scientific facts. You are so out of the loop on all of the data.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can't speak for all of us WaPo employees, but I'm not happy....

Then I am happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Also, remember the HUGE S storm WaPo tried to drum up over the Catholic school boy incident in DC? WaPo ran the story before it had the facts because it for the leftist narrative that a white straight male did something bad against an oppressed minotory. Oopsie, we only found out later that the school boy didn't do anything wrong and that other groups were antagonizing him first after the full video of the incident got released. It was a huge egg on the face of the paper. The Dem reader base disregarded all facts and ate that story up like red meat because it was an opium hit for the oppression addiction.

So Ds thought the little prick instigated the stand off but that turned out to be not true. Ok.

Now please share all of the way that Rs failed to follow “evidence and facts”.

So we can get our unbiased, nonpartisan comparison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Dems refused to acknowledge the lab leak theory for COVID. Now look at it ..it may be the most plausible story for the origins of covid out there.

Dems hated science because it was supposedly racist to claim that covid could have been leaked by the Chinese.

Research scientist here. NO. The accidental lab leak theory cannot be proven and has just as much probability of being right as the natural zoonotic transmission (cross-species infection through close association of humans with wild animals). We do not know, and will probably never know.

The media exists to sell itself and therefore be dramatic. Of course it's going to publish all sorts of nonsense on subjects it does not understand.

You must be a terrible scientist then. I suggest you read the peice that came out yesterday in the NYT that was written by a BROAD INSTITUTE scientist in how the lab leak theory is entirely plausible and the most likely explanation for COVID. You sound like you're completely ignorant to all of the scientific facts. The peice throughly trashes the idea of zoonotic transmission with tons of hard scientific facts. You are so out of the loop on all of the data.

We were discussing the D’s response to the lab leak theory years ago. What “facts and evidence” did they fail to follow back then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe their focus and priorities are what has caused a drop in subscribers......

Or maybe the women and people of color who work in the newsroom are wondering what it means for their prospects of getting promotions that the new boss thinks it's easier to just hire white men he already knows than it is to do a real search?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe their focus and priorities are what has caused a drop in subscribers......

Or maybe the women and people of color who work in the newsroom are wondering what it means for their prospects of getting promotions that the new boss thinks it's easier to just hire white men he already knows than it is to do a real search?

To be fair, he did hire an immigrant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Also, remember the HUGE S storm WaPo tried to drum up over the Catholic school boy incident in DC? WaPo ran the story before it had the facts because it for the leftist narrative that a white straight male did something bad against an oppressed minotory. Oopsie, we only found out later that the school boy didn't do anything wrong and that other groups were antagonizing him first after the full video of the incident got released. It was a huge egg on the face of the paper. The Dem reader base disregarded all facts and ate that story up like red meat because it was an opium hit for the oppression addiction.

So Ds thought the little prick instigated the stand off but that turned out to be not true. Ok.

Now please share all of the way that Rs failed to follow “evidence and facts”.

So we can get our unbiased, nonpartisan comparison.

Still waiting on this comparison.

Or maybe we can just cut to the point and recognize that Ds generally do a MUCH better job at following facts/evidence than Rs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Also, remember the HUGE S storm WaPo tried to drum up over the Catholic school boy incident in DC? WaPo ran the story before it had the facts because it for the leftist narrative that a white straight male did something bad against an oppressed minotory. Oopsie, we only found out later that the school boy didn't do anything wrong and that other groups were antagonizing him first after the full video of the incident got released. It was a huge egg on the face of the paper. The Dem reader base disregarded all facts and ate that story up like red meat because it was an opium hit for the oppression addiction.

So Ds thought the little prick instigated the stand off but that turned out to be not true. Ok.

Now please share all of the way that Rs failed to follow “evidence and facts”.

So we can get our unbiased, nonpartisan comparison.

Still waiting on this comparison.

Or maybe we can just cut to the point and recognize that Ds generally do a MUCH better job at following facts/evidence than Rs.

Yeah right. Laughable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Also, remember the HUGE S storm WaPo tried to drum up over the Catholic school boy incident in DC? WaPo ran the story before it had the facts because it for the leftist narrative that a white straight male did something bad against an oppressed minotory. Oopsie, we only found out later that the school boy didn't do anything wrong and that other groups were antagonizing him first after the full video of the incident got released. It was a huge egg on the face of the paper. The Dem reader base disregarded all facts and ate that story up like red meat because it was an opium hit for the oppression addiction.

So Ds thought the little prick instigated the stand off but that turned out to be not true. Ok.

Now please share all of the way that Rs failed to follow “evidence and facts”.

So we can get our unbiased, nonpartisan comparison.

Still waiting on this comparison.

Or maybe we can just cut to the point and recognize that Ds generally do a MUCH better job at following facts/evidence than Rs.

Yeah right. Laughable.

You are welcome to provide compelling facts & evidence if you believe otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Also, remember the HUGE S storm WaPo tried to drum up over the Catholic school boy incident in DC? WaPo ran the story before it had the facts because it for the leftist narrative that a white straight male did something bad against an oppressed minotory. Oopsie, we only found out later that the school boy didn't do anything wrong and that other groups were antagonizing him first after the full video of the incident got released. It was a huge egg on the face of the paper. The Dem reader base disregarded all facts and ate that story up like red meat because it was an opium hit for the oppression addiction.

So Ds thought the little prick instigated the stand off but that turned out to be not true. Ok.

Now please share all of the way that Rs failed to follow “evidence and facts”.

So we can get our unbiased, nonpartisan comparison.

Still waiting on this comparison.

Or maybe we can just cut to the point and recognize that Ds generally do a MUCH better job at following facts/evidence than Rs.

Yeah right. Laughable.

You are welcome to provide compelling facts & evidence if you believe otherwise.

So are you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Dems refused to acknowledge the lab leak theory for COVID. Now look at it ..it may be the most plausible story for the origins of covid out there.

Dems hated science because it was supposedly racist to claim that covid could have been leaked by the Chinese.

Research scientist here. NO. The accidental lab leak theory cannot be proven and has just as much probability of being right as the natural zoonotic transmission (cross-species infection through close association of humans with wild animals). We do not know, and will probably never know.

The media exists to sell itself and therefore be dramatic. Of course it's going to publish all sorts of nonsense on subjects it does not understand.

You are the reason people no longer in science.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help.

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better.

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality.

Evidence? Please compare the two.

Also, remember the HUGE S storm WaPo tried to drum up over the Catholic school boy incident in DC? WaPo ran the story before it had the facts because it for the leftist narrative that a white straight male did something bad against an oppressed minotory. Oopsie, we only found out later that the school boy didn't do anything wrong and that other groups were antagonizing him first after the full video of the incident got released. It was a huge egg on the face of the paper. The Dem reader base disregarded all facts and ate that story up like red meat because it was an opium hit for the oppression addiction.

So Ds thought the little prick instigated the stand off but that turned out to be not true. Ok.

Now please share all of the way that Rs failed to follow “evidence and facts”.

So we can get our unbiased, nonpartisan comparison.

Still waiting on this comparison.

Or maybe we can just cut to the point and recognize that Ds generally do a MUCH better job at following facts/evidence than Rs.

Yeah right. Laughable.

You are welcome to provide compelling facts & evidence if you believe otherwise.

So are you.

Here is what the PP said:
“ Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans. ”

PP can back that crap up with some “evidence and facts” or retract.

It’s clearly BS “both sides” and we all know it. There’s a whole thread on dumb crap Rs believe on political.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/300/1197650.page#27606284