Reply to Wash Post—new editor from WSJ!?

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Wash Post—new editor from WSJ!?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’ve been a faithful reader for 40 years and just cancelled my subscription. Going to try NY Times. Maybe WaPo can get back on track. Maybe this editor can help. [/quote]

NYT is also SJW newspaper at this point so it won’t be better. [/quote]

Huh? The NYT is the newspaper of record in the United States. There's no better publication.

Pro-tip: Failing to parrot your biases doesn't make the paper "SJW."

Besides, facts have a well-known liberal bias. [/quote]

This is exactly why the NYT sucks now because of arrogant people like you. [b]Democrats are not much better at following evidence and facts and in comparison to Republicans.[/b] Most people only accept the “facts” when it is consistent with their underlying beliefs and very few people objectively evaluate things anymore. Almost everyone lives in an internet rabbit hole at this point and social media algorithms are reinforcing this ridiculous partisanship where everyone is increasingly disconnected from reality. [/quote]

Evidence? Please compare the two. 
[/quote]

Also, remember the HUGE S storm WaPo tried to drum up over the Catholic school boy incident in DC?  WaPo ran the story before it had the facts because it for the leftist narrative that a white straight male did something bad against an oppressed minotory.  Oopsie, we only found out later that the school boy didn't do anything wrong and that other groups were antagonizing him first after the full video of the incident got released.  It was a huge egg on the face of the paper. The Dem reader base disregarded all facts and ate that story up like red meat because it was an opium hit for the oppression addiction. [/quote]

So Ds thought the little prick instigated the stand off but that turned out to be not true. Ok.

Now please share all of the way that Rs failed to follow “evidence and facts”.

So we can get our unbiased, nonpartisan comparison. 
[/quote]

Still waiting on this comparison.

Or maybe we can just cut to the point and recognize that Ds generally do a MUCH better job at following facts/evidence than Rs. 
[/quote]

Yeah right. Laughable.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics