Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was a whole article about this in the Atlantic (
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/09/yale-college-undergrad-clubs-competitive/675219/)....what was upsetting was the exclusiveness of clubs that had no reason to be exclusive.
I have found this to be true at my DC's school and her friends at other schools say similar things. In an age where kids have a hard enough time connecting with one another, I found it quite disheartening.
My DD graduated from Yale the year before this article was published and she cried when she read it. She tried to join many activities- some which she had excelled at in HS, and others which represented new interests. She was shut out of everything after multiple years' of attempts. The gatekeeping was insane. At one point she attempted intramural sports, which is totally casual competition representing each dorm, not even close to the level of club sports. She was rejected by the captains of multiple teams because "they had enough experienced players and women already." She played for a strong varsity softball program in HS and was recruited for D3, but she only managed to get a chance to join intramural softball games 2-3 times and only for headcount because another woman was sick.
She ended up working out at the gym a lot, writing for a minor publication at school and focusing most of her time on school, friends, and her on-campus job. In her experience, there were a few kids picking up multiple activities and everyone else was scrambling for scraps. It was disheartening.
The one thing about the article that she criticized was that the woman in the story (I haven't re-read it) who shared her perspective was talking about how hard it was to join an activity when she was actually accepted into one of the most selective ones (the Carillonneurs). That gave my DD a good laugh because if someone is complaining about selection to a very elite group, they have no idea how hard it is for the more average student.