Are you trying to quote in-bound participation rate? If so, those numbers are wrong (at least as to Maury and Miner). You’re citing the proportion of students who attend the school who are in-bounds for that school, not the proportion of in-bounds kids who decide to go to the school. For the latter, it’s like 64% at Maury and 26% at Miner. I don’t have the others handy. |
Yes- those numbers in the initial post were what percent of the school was comprised of students who lived in the boundary. With all of the school closures/conversions to condos/charters from 15 years ago, there are some DCPS school boundaries that if all of the in bounds kids enrolled in their DCPS there would be a serious overcrowding issue. I would argue that is part of the crowding issue at Maury. Because of Friendship, Two Rivers, and other nearby DCPS schools, a lot of kids who live IB for Miner go elsewhere, but even with that, 62% of the kids at Miner come from in bounds. There are just a lot of kids living in that boundary - lots of housing density. |