Duke tied with HARVARD at #4. What's wrong with this picture? DCUM math: Duke = Harvard, Harvard = Stanford, Duke = Stanford |
Right. Even the older DC-raised people I know are not snobby that way. It's a good thing! |
No. I’m in So Cal. Pretty easy going compared to other spots. My kid is at a competitive school, but even so it’s not as culturally cutthroat. |
Sure, it did the job. Some of the students were a bit too conservative for my liking, but there were enough students that I had a good social circle. Because, it’s not a top notch school I graduated Summa Cume Laude and the professors were tripping over themselves to give me opportunities - that was awesome. Had I gone to Harvard or somewhere more competitive, maybe I would be middle of the pack and have had less individual help to get opportunities. |
Newport Beach is home to the varsity blues scandal. It is or was a home also to Michael Avenatti, Stormy Daniel's one-time attorney, sentenced for extortion plot. The city is full of retirees who may no longer be competing. The younger ones, aren't exactly the cooperative types. The city of Newport Beach has a very high percentage of apartments relative to homeowners. These are often Newport wannabes. It's a competitive environment. |
This looks like it was calculated from taking pure numerical averages of all the rankings, so no subjectivity and all performance-based. To be fair, Harvard is obviously the poster child of higher education but their undergrad experience has been known to leave something to be desired. |
| LOL, Michigan above Berkeley. Okay... |
The varsity blues scandal was clueless SoCal types who took the "wrong" way to force their kids into college (bribing coaches, getting ringers to take the SAT, etc.) NorCal, NYC, DC parents do things the "right" way (donations, extensive prep, hired 'reputable' college counselors, etc.) Varsity blues revealed precisely how not plugged in SoCal is. |
PP again. That said, with its own share of academic scandals, it's not as "competitive" as nearby high schools, e.g., University HS of Irvine, that have a large Asian population. Asian schools are competitive in an academic sense. Newport Beach is competitive in another sense, where some - but not all - entitled parents play the laid-back game while behind the scene, they literally cheat their way up the academic ladder. |
Oh thanks for explaining Newport Beach to me 😂 As I mentioned I live in Southern California and I know it well. Still, it’s not cutthroat and academically competitive like the Bay Area. It’s just not. |
NB is cutthroat in terms of looks and bling, not academics. -long time resident of both SoCal and Bay Area |
Definitely. I grew up in Massachusetts and it is MUCH more prestige obsessed than here. |
Exactly |
Well it doesn’t help that Mass is the college capital of America. Harvard and MIT in proximity probably makes some parents go a bit crazy. |
|
Observations from someone who group in an extremely immigrant-dense middle and lower-middle class part of the Bay Area:
Few of the kids and parents at my school were prestige obsessed. The overwhelming focus was on what was affordable and best for one's career, which meant educational pathways to programming, medicine, or, to a lesser extent, law. UCs were the focus, with Berkeley on top because it was affordable, local, and internationally very well known. I'm sure kids in affluent towns like Los Altos, Piedmont, or Orinda were obsessing over HYPSM and LACs like AWS though. As for Southern California, it's certainly academically competitive. But where it really shines is sports. I played in a travel club sport and in Olympic development teams all over the western half of America, and I don't think any region was as focused or obsessed with youth athletic development as Southern California. |