Doesn't count for what? This shows that the kids who did best at that test that day, inarguably bright students, attend these colleges. There are bright kids everywhere. You do not need to go to Harvard to be in class with other really bright people. |
I think you are looking at it backward. |
Some surprises...UVA, Cornell, NYU seem kind of low. Not surprisingly, Harvey Mudd, Cal Tech, Harvard, Yale, Princeton kick butt and take names. |
You might be looking at their admissions % and thinking that accounts for all students. It doesn't. Many students are admitted to and attend these schools, but are not included in what they report in their admissions percentage. But the percentage here does include all freshmen. "One critique that does carry weight is that having LSP inflates NYU’s admissions statistics. In the University’s Admitted Student Profile, which includes median SAT scores, class rank, and average grades, LSP students’ stats are left out, because “[the program has] more flexible admission standards.” That’s a slippery way out that makes the aggregate stats very misleading, considering that LSP is nearly a quarter of each year’s freshman class." https://nyulocal.com/the-liberal-studies-program-explained-a3391d57abf9 These aren't the only schools that do this, some use Spring start, freshman year abroad, alternate campuses, other special programs; but it is one big reason why you should be skeptical of those admissions figures (and school rankings), and don't let it steer you away from applying to a school you love. |
Without context, this doesn't mean that much. UT Dallas is one of the highest with 232, but it sponsors (pays) 202 of those. UT Austin, the flagship of the UT System, has 85 but it does not sponsor any. It is surprising to me that Vanderbilt and Emory sponsor so many. Generally, the most selective universities do not. |
"Doesn't count for what? This shows that the kids who did best at that test that day, inarguably bright students, attend these colleges. There are bright kids everywhere. You do not need to go to Harvard to be in class with other really bright people."
Not really. The odds of having classmates with high SAT scores at Stanford is much higher than at Bama. If you're using the SAT scores of freshman to assess how "bright" enrolled students are, you should use the median SAT score, not the raw number or share of people scoring at the very top. Schools like MIT will only admit applicants who are capable of doing well on standardized tests. They're selecting from among people with strong scores. You can't get in without them. In contrast, the vast majority of students at a school like Bama will not have strong SAT scores. |
PP again. It's useful to look at the average SAT scores across a wide range of schools. There are lots of "second tier" LACs with much high median SAT scores than you'd find at very competitive schools, especially the big football public schools. The vibe at these LACs will be more intellectual and academic than at the big football schools. |
A bit outdated, but good data:
https://www.collegeconfidential.com/lists/best-colleges-for-national-merit-finalists/ |
Among publics that don't sponsor, the top 5 are:
93 Berkeley 90 Georgia Tech 85 UT Austin 77 UCLA 76 Michigan |
A good number of TJ grads selected Purdue for class of 2027 (I think it was 17). I believe half of those were NMSF that were sponsored. It was noted one of the TJ announcements. |
My take...Purdue, Indiana. Michigan are huge schools. I did not know that Purdue has almost 40,000 undergrads.
Where is Boston College? It is missing. |
Harvey Mudd sponsors. The others do not. Virginia Tech does not appear to have any. That is a bit surprising. No JMU either. |
Pretty much follows the prestige rankings... |
This is a really random list, and not in order. My alma mater SLAC routinely has 30+ and isn't listed. |
Well, there is the DCUM view of UVA vs. the non-DCUM view of UVA. |