Bias against privates high school in admissions?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wealthy people just don’t use public high school. Personally I never even considered it.



Omg did you type this with a straight face?


Honestly, I wouldn’t have said that but I pretty much agree. We never considered public. We send our kids to private because we can easily afford $50k tuition (x4) and we really don’t know many people that send their kids to public school. Maybe for elementary school they do public? I don’t know.


Good lord. You all live in some crazy bubbles. Bet you don’t know anyone who cleans their own house or mows their own lawn either. It’s great to be well off. You might ponder whether you might expand your circle a bit though. Unbelievable.


Not sure why this bothers you. My kids have never gone to public school other than to use their tennis courts.

Not going to public school and not knowing anyone who goes to public school are two very different things.


My kid meets public school kids at their summer camps otherwise they don’t mingle.
Anonymous
We didn’t choose private HS to gain an admissions advantage, and knew it might even be a disadvantage in that department.

We did it for the smaller classes. The emphasis on writing and critical thinking. For less bureaucracy and more personal relationships with faculty.

It doesn’t matter to me at all if this means DC ends up going to a 150 ranked college vs a Top 25. I’m confident that the work ethic and discipline DC has learned will make up for whatever admission’s disadvantage attending a rigorous private entails.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My DC private school kid and several friends got into UVA EA. All submitted high test scores/rigorous courses/high GPAs.

It was just an incredibly tough year.
o

+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wealthy people just don’t use public high school. Personally I never even considered it.



Omg did you type this with a straight face?


Honestly, I wouldn’t have said that but I pretty much agree. We never considered public. We send our kids to private because we can easily afford $50k tuition (x4) and we really don’t know many people that send their kids to public school. Maybe for elementary school they do public? I don’t know.


Ditto….
Small classes/bespoke curriculum /Amazing eye-opening ECs, research ops and independent studies and no rowdy distractions- well worth it



Did you just use “bespoke” with reference to your child’s education?? Please, please stick to private school.



It's like a skit from SNL

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wealthy people just don’t use public high school. Personally I never even considered it.



Omg did you type this with a straight face?


Honestly, I wouldn’t have said that but I pretty much agree. We never considered public. We send our kids to private because we can easily afford $50k tuition (x4) and we really don’t know many people that send their kids to public school. Maybe for elementary school they do public? I don’t know.


Good lord. You all live in some crazy bubbles. Bet you don’t know anyone who cleans their own house or mows their own lawn either. It’s great to be well off. You might ponder whether you might expand your circle a bit though. Unbelievable.


Not sure why this bothers you. My kids have never gone to public school other than to use their tennis courts.

Not going to public school and not knowing anyone who goes to public school are two very different things.


My kid meets public school kids at their summer camps otherwise they don’t mingle.


And you also avoid mingling with adults who send kids to public school? Indeed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wealthy people just don’t use public high school. Personally I never even considered it.



Omg did you type this with a straight face?


Honestly, I wouldn’t have said that but I pretty much agree. We never considered public. We send our kids to private because we can easily afford $50k tuition (x4) and we really don’t know many people that send their kids to public school. Maybe for elementary school they do public? I don’t know.


Good lord. You all live in some crazy bubbles. Bet you don’t know anyone who cleans their own house or mows their own lawn either. It’s great to be well off. You might ponder whether you might expand your circle a bit though. Unbelievable.


Not sure why this bothers you. My kids have never gone to public school other than to use their tennis courts.

Not going to public school and not knowing anyone who goes to public school are two very different things.


My kid meets public school kids at their summer camps otherwise they don’t mingle.


And you also avoid mingling with adults who send kids to public school? Indeed.


Where do I find you?
Anonymous
OP, do you really think a ton of the kids getting in are 1st gen? They are being sought because they have mire hurdles and are underrepresented. Do you get what underrepresented means? There aren't that many of them. I wish people would stop focusing on the underrepresented few. Those kids are not "beating out" some private school kid for the same spot. That's not how it works.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OP, do you really think a ton of the kids getting in are 1st gen? They are being sought because they have mire hurdles and are underrepresented. Do you get what underrepresented means? There aren't that many of them. I wish people would stop focusing on the underrepresented few. Those kids are not "beating out" some private school kid for the same spot. That's not how it works.


In fact, there are lots of URMs and FGLIs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Troll harder, recent arrival reddit teenager.

48 year old women (aka, the moms of a middle schooler contemplating private HS and beyond) do not frame the equation like you did OP.

Nor do they say “convo”


Umm. Not the OP.
But 48 with a senior…
Private school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP, do you really think a ton of the kids getting in are 1st gen? They are being sought because they have mire hurdles and are underrepresented. Do you get what underrepresented means? There aren't that many of them. I wish people would stop focusing on the underrepresented few. Those kids are not "beating out" some private school kid for the same spot. That's not how it works.


In fact, there are lots of URMs and FGLIs.


Huge open and vocal priority for certain schools. See Dartmouth. Except it YRM/FG/Rural and international that’s their focus
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wealthy people just don’t use public high school. Personally I never even considered it.



Omg did you type this with a straight face?


Honestly, I wouldn’t have said that but I pretty much agree. We never considered public. We send our kids to private because we can easily afford $50k tuition (x4) and we really don’t know many people that send their kids to public school. Maybe for elementary school they do public? I don’t know.


Good lord. You all live in some crazy bubbles. Bet you don’t know anyone who cleans their own house or mows their own lawn either. It’s great to be well off. You might ponder whether you might expand your circle a bit though. Unbelievable.


Not sure why this bothers you. My kids have never gone to public school other than to use their tennis courts.

Not going to public school and not knowing anyone who goes to public school are two very different things.


My kid meets public school kids at their summer camps otherwise they don’t mingle.


And you also avoid mingling with adults who send kids to public school? Indeed.


This is not our circle. Many do public K-8 and just switch to private for HS. Some do private through MS and then switch to public. Our zoning is so a lot of kids together k-5 end up at different public MSs, some get reunited again when they filter back into same public HS.

My kid has many friend groups. His closest are the kids he met in public K and spent childhood playing with—even now he’s in private and in group of 8 it’s a mix of 6 different HS. 3 different public and 3 different private. He also has many friends from his club sports team that don’t live nearby—different school systems entirely.

I don’t see these hard lines anywhere but on this forum. And, yes, they made a lot of friends over the years on different travel teams and different camps and paths are always crossing.
Anonymous
^ this is an area of $2-4 million+ homes. So not poor kids
Anonymous
We didn't choose to send DS to private K-8 or private HS for better college matriculation. He's a sophomore, so time will tell on that. Our decision was for smaller class size and a more intimate environment for social relationships. It's been home run on those elements so far. He has a lot more confidence and been more engaged in his learning than either my husband or I (we went to large public schools from K-12).

So it really depends on what you are focused on. If it's college outcomes, than ask about the private schools matriculation data. We looked at ours, but were less interested in that. The learning, social and study skills you develop K-12 were a bigger factor for us than college matriculation results, although our HS is pretty competitive on that front too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP, do you really think a ton of the kids getting in are 1st gen? They are being sought because they have mire hurdles and are underrepresented. Do you get what underrepresented means? There aren't that many of them. I wish people would stop focusing on the underrepresented few. Those kids are not "beating out" some private school kid for the same spot. That's not how it works.


In fact, there are lots of URMs and FGLIs.


Not really. You just telegraphed that you have no experience with these schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP, do you really think a ton of the kids getting in are 1st gen? They are being sought because they have mire hurdles and are underrepresented. Do you get what underrepresented means? There aren't that many of them. I wish people would stop focusing on the underrepresented few. Those kids are not "beating out" some private school kid for the same spot. That's not how it works.


In fact, there are lots of URMs and FGLIs.


Huge open and vocal priority for certain schools. See Dartmouth. Except it YRM/FG/Rural and international that’s their focus


Because there are not many of these students on campus. Have you ever been to Dartmouth? The number of private school kids is staggering. When we went for admitted students day, so many were swanky private kids. Very few URMs and almost no first gen. They realize this needs to be a priority, and good for them. My kid might have accepted if there were more diversity. So many Chets....
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: