International Baccalaureate is leaving Tenleytown already

[Anonymous]

They signed the lease before covid, but agree. But now with remote, whole space is up for sublease.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frumin is so cowardly. He votes "present" on crime bill amendments. How about taking a stand to support your constituents?

Frumin has a constituency of one: “Bill”

He thinks the rest of Ward 3 are all racists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a LOT more planned density. Population is pretty stable and spread out a lot more than 20 years ago. Hmmmm....

This is just hopes and dreams of some SJW young planners. They'll be gone soon enough. This will never come to pass in its current form, thanks god.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a LOT more planned density. Population is pretty stable and spread out a lot more than 20 years ago. Hmmmm....

This is just hopes and dreams of some SJW young planners. They'll be gone soon enough. This will never come to pass in its current form, thanks god.

Where are they going to put thousands of additional K-12 students in Ward 3?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a LOT more planned density. Population is pretty stable and spread out a lot more than 20 years ago. Hmmmm....

This is just hopes and dreams of some SJW young planners. They'll be gone soon enough. This will never come to pass in its current form, thanks god.

This seems... Insane.

More restaurants and retail yes. More "units"? Eh....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin is so cowardly. He votes "present" on crime bill amendments. How about taking a stand to support your constituents?

Frumin has a constituency of one: “Bill”

He thinks the rest of Ward 3 are all racists.

There's only one "Bill" that Frumin had better care about: The Secure Omnibus Crime Bill. Stop equivocating, Councilmember, and support it already!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a LOT more planned density. Population is pretty stable and spread out a lot more than 20 years ago. Hmmmm....

This is just hopes and dreams of some SJW young planners. They'll be gone soon enough. This will never come to pass in its current form, thanks god.

Where are they going to put thousands of additional K-12 students in Ward 3?

For equity and inclusion, naturally. Alice Deal for All!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a LOT more planned density. Population is pretty stable and spread out a lot more than 20 years ago. Hmmmm....

This is just hopes and dreams of some SJW young planners. They'll be gone soon enough. This will never come to pass in its current form, thanks god.

Note to SJW young planners: Stop calling our neighborhoods "corridors." For a crowd that claims not to be automobile-centric, "corridors" is an ironic term.

[Anonymous]

The former Fannie Mae building would make a nice boutique hotel. There are few places to stay in Upper Northwest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a LOT more planned density. Population is pretty stable and spread out a lot more than 20 years ago. Hmmmm....

This is just hopes and dreams of some SJW young planners. They'll be gone soon enough. This will never come to pass in its current form, thanks god.

Note to SJW young planners: Stop calling our neighborhoods "corridors." For a crowd that claims not to be automobile-centric, "corridors" is an ironic term.

Yeah why do they do that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The former Fannie Mae building would make a nice boutique hotel. There are few places to stay in Upper Northwest.

It would be lovely, but would the city cram it with the same folks they crammed into days inn? My parents used to stay there (our guest room is not accessible) but I have forbidden it now of course. So we are moving to a more accessible house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The former Fannie Mae building would make a nice boutique hotel. There are few places to stay in Upper Northwest.

Not going to happen, hotel demand is much softer post cv.

No idea who they are going to sublet it to, it's kind of a strange location and it's a huge space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a LOT more planned density. Population is pretty stable and spread out a lot more than 20 years ago. Hmmmm....

This is just hopes and dreams of some SJW young planners. They'll be gone soon enough. This will never come to pass in its current form, thanks god.

Note to SJW young planners: Stop calling our neighborhoods "corridors." For a crowd that claims not to be automobile-centric, "corridors" is an ironic term.

Yeah why do they do that?

Because they want highrises crowded against the roads with SFH homes hidden in the back. See Arlington.