Annoyed That Private School High School Students Have Better Admissions Results than Public School Students

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


Are we pretending public schools don't inflate grades. I can name several public schools that allow for unlimited test retakes, unlimited extra-credit, and have very low standards for getting an "A" on their essays.

I've known students that have gone through Sidwell/STA/NCS. The work that would get a "B" there would easily get an "A" in most publics.


How do you know that? Do you have any evidence that grading is more lenient in public than in private? Not saying it’s not possible but your argument derived from some students “you’ve known” has absolutely no value.


I know this because I've seen many, many students make the switch, and they almost always take a GPA hit when they go to one of the prestigious DC-area privates. The most elite private schools are selectively screening for students that score above the 85th percentile of the SSAT, usually higher. The work given is typically tougher and the standards are higher.

Just look at the grading policies at NCS for example: https://ncs.cathedral.org/academics/overview/upper-school#:~:text=NCS%20uses%20a%20standard%2C%20unweighted,GPA%20and%20reported%20to%20colleges.

The work that would qualify for a "B" at NCS, would easily get an A at any public school. Depending on the teacher, even "C" work at NCS would get an A at a public school.


Again, how do you know that?

You offer some anecdotal evidence of “many, many” students you’ve “seen” taking a
GPA hit. How would you actually know the GPA of said students is a mystery.

Privates do screen to some degree, but so do magnets, so you’d have to be a bit more specific about what you’re comparing.

I’d argue that a good comparison for grades and course rigor would be the results on AP exams, but privates stopped offering AP courses and exams.

If indeed the grade inflation is rampant in public schools it would be straightforward to compare regular grades with the passing rate on the AP exams. What you’ll find is that some schools do well and others not so much.

Regardless, it’s silly to claim that a B at NCS would easily get at A at any public.


It's not silly at all if you've seen the quality of NCS-level work.

This article is pretty old, but it details how difficult a lot of these schools actually are. You can take a bright kid, give him an army of tutors, and still not come out with straight-A's. You certainly cannot say the same for most standard public schools.

https://www.washingtonian.com/2011/10/09/snowplow-parents-and-the-pressure-at-top-private-schools/


You are seriously challenged when it comes to statistics and logic.

It may be that NCS curriculum is challenging, but there’s a long way from there to conclude that a B at NCS is an A at any public.

If you want to demonstrate that there’s less grade inflation at privates find some statistical data like the distribution of grades, the range etc. instead you’re just relying on anecdotes that might have some marginal value to prove your point, but they are not as convincing as you imagine.

The reality is one can get a good education in both public and privates and there are bright kids everywhere. Parents choose based on their finances and how good of a fit is for their children.
Anonymous
FCPS schools have HUGE grade inflation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


Are we pretending public schools don't inflate grades. I can name several public schools that allow for unlimited test retakes, unlimited extra-credit, and have very low standards for getting an "A" on their essays.

I've known students that have gone through Sidwell/STA/NCS. The work that would get a "B" there would easily get an "A" in most publics.


Not at our public. No retakes for tests, only limited assignments you are allowed to redo and no extra credit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Generally college admissions are much easier from public schools. This thread has it backwards.


Exactly. Christopher Rim, a professional college admissions consultant, told this to the NY Post.: https://nypost.com/2023/11/16/lifestyle/kids-ditching-prep-schools-for-public-to-get-into-the-ivy-league/

The truth is that for any elite school, you need to be near the top of your class and have near-perfect grades if you want the most coveted colleges (HYPSM). Though an elite private may send 8 kids to Harvard, 3 of those may be legacy, 2 recruited athletes, 2 urms, leaving one or two spots for unhooked students. Ivy League schools use prep schools to fulfill their institutional priorities. If you're an unhooked kid at the median, you're going to Tulane or Indiana, or something.

Rim says that most families are much better off going to a medium-tier public school, because you won't have to battle against legacies, athletes, super-smart URMs, or children of celebrities, donors, etc. It's far easier to be the lone Harvard-quality superstar at West Podunk Township High School than it is at St. Albans or Sidwell.


This is true BUT going to a top MCPS school is just as bad or worse. Between the sheer number of excellent students and the laughable grading....

If your child is truly an academic star (not "of course they are!" I mean a REAL star) and they have the other boxes checked in terms of talents and skills an interesting story or whatever...Here is what you should do: Send them to a good but not great Private. Somewhere they will be a top student or THE top student. OR, move to PG or somewhere out in the sticks and send them to the local public school. That is how you stand out. You want to be the 10th best math student at Blair or the top student somewhere else?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


Are we pretending public schools don't inflate grades. I can name several public schools that allow for unlimited test retakes, unlimited extra-credit, and have very low standards for getting an "A" on their essays.

I've known students that have gone through Sidwell/STA/NCS. The work that would get a "B" there would easily get an "A" in most publics.


How do you know that? Do you have any evidence that grading is more lenient in public than in private? Not saying it’s not possible but your argument derived from some students “you’ve known” has absolutely no value.


Because these schools will routinely get 90%+ of a class to a 5 on the AP exam and yet only give 10% of the class an A in the course.
It is not unusual to have 80 kids in a course and only give 5-8 A's as final grades.
It is quite typical to get a B or B+ and then a 5.


Cite?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


It’s just one of many unfair things with college admissions. These same people are shelling out thousands for admissions counselors to curate activity lists, “edit” essays, the list goes on.



No one who sends their kid to public school can ever complain about grade inflation. Public schools are take a test, retake the test, no final exams, take the test until you get the score that you want, endless extra credit, rinse and repeat.
Anonymous
We’ve had our child in public school in Montgomery County and private school in Montgomery County. And I can tell you with absolute certainty Montgomery County, Public schools, great inflate, astronomically her private school, if anything grade deflates.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


Are we pretending public schools don't inflate grades. I can name several public schools that allow for unlimited test retakes, unlimited extra-credit, and have very low standards for getting an "A" on their essays.

I've known students that have gone through Sidwell/STA/NCS. The work that would get a "B" there would easily get an "A" in most publics.


How do you know that? Do you have any evidence that grading is more lenient in public than in private? Not saying it’s not possible but your argument derived from some students “you’ve known” has absolutely no value.


Because these schools will routinely get 90%+ of a class to a 5 on the AP exam and yet only give 10% of the class an A in the course.
It is not unusual to have 80 kids in a course and only give 5-8 A's as final grades.
It is quite typical to get a B or B+ and then a 5.


Cite?


There’s no cite, it’s just a made up stat, to make themselves feel better about their kid getting a bunch of B’s. It’s almost certain the B kid won’t get a 5 on the AP exam, in fact their school don’t even offer the AP class or the AP exam but at least they feel a little better by claiming the child’s B is an A in disguise.
Anonymous
Why does this thread fell like it was started by a disgruntled parent from the private school college acceptances thread?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


You MUST be joking with your talk about inflated grading when your kid goes to Montgomery County. You can get an A one semester and a D another and get a B for the final grade. MCPS also gives full credit for homework if there is a “good faith effort.” - no points taken off for accuracy or completeness. Also, you can’t get below a 50%. My kid at private doesn’t have any of this nonsense. She earns her grades.


Why are you so upset about this? If a student had a 92 A one semester and a 68 D the second semester, that would average to an 80, which is in fact a B.


Everyone starts with a 50, so you are almost guaranteed a D. Plus, most Ds averaged with a A are, in fact, a C or a B-. What’s wrong with just getting the grade you deserve? Average the two numbers and be done. But that’s not how equity/MCPS works.




That certainly isn’t the case everywhere. MCPS sounds like a special case of grade inflation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


Are we pretending public schools don't inflate grades. I can name several public schools that allow for unlimited test retakes, unlimited extra-credit, and have very low standards for getting an "A" on their essays.

I've known students that have gone through Sidwell/STA/NCS. The work that would get a "B" there would easily get an "A" in most publics.


Not at our public. No retakes for tests, only limited assignments you are allowed to redo and no extra credit.


Same. Our public, outside of DMV btw, is pretty tough on grading. Especially in honors and AP classes. Kids have to work for their grades.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well my niece just got in early decision at Harvard (non-legacy) and goes to private. Would not say she’s particularly a stand out when I think of everyone else I know who got into undergrad there. Totatally think it helped get her in


That seems made up. First why would you talk about your niece like that, and second most people getting into Harvard are definitely amazing in some way. Being in private won’t significantly change the odds.

This thread sounds like copium justifying the money spent on tuition. There are legitimate reasons for going to private, but the advantage to college admissions is not one of them.
.

Not made up at all. She goes to a very expensive private school in NY and she got in ED. Believe me or not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why does this thread fell like it was started by a disgruntled parent from the private school college acceptances thread?


I thought the same!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The rich students in MCPS have the same advantages. It’s really a rich vs poor issue not a private vs public issue. But yes, it is really unfair!

Private schools do have the advantage of better school counselors. I find it odd that admissions requires school counselor recommendations.

That gives the private school an edge because most public schools are too large for the counselor to get to know the student in order to provide any meaningful input.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between their inflated grades and $$ to do early decision (because they can pay), this system seems so rigged. Anyone else notice this?


You MUST be joking with your talk about inflated grading when your kid goes to Montgomery County. You can get an A one semester and a D another and get a B for the final grade. MCPS also gives full credit for homework if there is a “good faith effort.” - no points taken off for accuracy or completeness. Also, you can’t get below a 50%. My kid at private doesn’t have any of this nonsense. She earns her grades.


Why are you so upset about this? If a student had a 92 A one semester and a 68 D the second semester, that would average to an 80, which is in fact a B.


Everyone starts with a 50, so you are almost guaranteed a D. Plus, most Ds averaged with a A are, in fact, a C or a B-. What’s wrong with just getting the grade you deserve? Average the two numbers and be done. But that’s not how equity/MCPS works.




That certainly isn’t the case everywhere. MCPS sounds like a special case of grade inflation.

It's not just MCPS. FCPS and DCPS have grade inflation, too.
post reply Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: