Academy of the Holy Cross vs. Connelly School of the Holy Child

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

[Anonymous]

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

Very good points. We are parents of an 8th grader and explored Holy Child. I will say that there was standing room only at their Open House and we know of two girls last year who were accepted at Holton and still chose Holy Child. So clearly there are parents who find great value in attending this school.

And I think their admissions are quite good actually. I’m not overly impressed with the college admissions for any of the girls schools. A few at some of the other schools will get into Ivy schools but overwhelmingly, most will not. The question is, where do the rest go? Holy Child has quite a few who go to UVA, Tulane and Wake Forest which are the EXACT same colleges the other schools are sending their girls too. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Holton is blowing everyone away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

You have me confused with somebody else...but honestly you sound like the bully here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

You have me confused with somebody else...but honestly you sound like the bully here.

PS I have no affiliation with either school FWIW!

[Anonymous]

I love all of the "haves" arguing with one another. These kids are all relatively wealthy and do well no matter where they go to school. Honestly, outside of the AHC girls, most of these kids probably don't even have to work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love all of the "haves" arguing with one another. These kids are all relatively wealthy and do well no matter where they go to school. Honestly, outside of the AHC girls, most of these kids probably don't even have to work.

+1
The majority of girls at both schools are cute and classy, just like their Moms, and will be prime wife material. If they want to work, that’s great, and if they don’t, they will have a great life playing tennis at Columbia or Kenwood and driving the kids to lacrosse practice.

[Anonymous]

AHC girls are the least attractive of all the girls schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

You have me confused with somebody else...but honestly you sound like the bully here.

Deflect, deflect. Just like a bully to gaslight. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

The only nasty PP on here is you, calling people bullies and denigrating an entire school when they simply blow holes through your weak arguments. The nasty on this board is that posters like you basically intimate that AHC is lower class. And this is what all of this is really about. Wealth and classism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

You have me confused with somebody else...but honestly you sound like the bully here.

Deflect, deflect. Just like a bully to gaslight. Yawn.

No, dear. You just don't want to accept that people see right through you. And clearly do not understand what bullying is. And that the name caller here is you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

You have me confused with somebody else...but honestly you sound like the bully here.

Deflect, deflect. Just like a bully to gaslight. Yawn.

No, dear. You just don't want to accept that people see right through you. And clearly do not understand what bullying is. And that the name caller here is you.

Bless your heart you can dish it but not take it. Typical mean girl.

[Anonymous]

NP - I don’t know where the one poster has a child (if at all) but agree the AHC Mother has not been very pleasant and is not being a very good ambassador for the school. Just my take.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Night and day. Average school (AHC) vs. a very good school (Holy Child). Just look at the college matriculation pages from last year and this year Holy Child is doing really well this year. Last year AHC had three very good acceptances, and one was the child of an employee of the school.

The W schools have superior college results than AHC. With less bullying too.

No HC is not really that impressive at all. Same as last year so far. Yes, one to Georgetown and a couple to UVA. Not one top 20 school. Not one early admit to Notre Dame. This is a Catholic school. I never see any admits to ND or BC from this school, even with all of its wealth and likely legacies. Why is that? Looking at SR and VISI, lots of admits to ND every year. Two already posted for VISI and one for SR this year.

Well people weren’t asking about SR or Visi, were they? Visi is not doing well at all this year compared to last year. Bitter pill I suppose. ED? There are no early decision Boston College admits? Since when does that determine a great school? Regular decision hasn’t even come out yet. Everyone knows that the weaker candidates apply ED anyway. Prep didn’t get one Boston College ED so they are terrible school? Stop being so jealous.

LOL, jealous of what? My daughter already graduated and is attending a top 20 university.

As for BC, I am not sure what point you are trying to make. HC didn't have any early BC admits either. VISI had two for ND. SR had one ND and one BC. I would not consider HC a better school than AHC. It is on par academically. It just has a wealthier student population.

Everyone knows that AHC is at the bottom for academics of all girls schools. Everyone. Not to say that they can’t get a top 20 every now and then outside of sports and hooks. I think they had one last year. And if wealth were the determining factor, everyone at Bullis would be going to a top 20 and they aren’t. They have good matriculation, but hardly what you would expect from such ostentatious as wealth -same with Georgetown Prep. Try again…

This. Admissions right now is a jungle. Any private high school that is consistently getting their kids into solid competitive schools deserves credit. Bullis isn’t doing that. Holy Child is doing that consistently.

Where are you getting your information? I just looked at both school provided matriculation lists. HC had one student out of the entire class matriculate to a top 20 school. Bullis had 16 or over 12% of their class do so with schools including Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, and other ivies. Take a look for yourself.

https://www.bullis.org/academics/college-counseling/college-matriculation
https://www.holychild.org/academics/college-counseling

Wait, I will go a step further and prove the PP completely off base. AHC had similar, if not better results last year. HC had one get into a top 20 (Michigan). AHC had one get into Michigan and one into Notre Dame. There was also a BC admit as well. Much better than HC lol. I think I actually know the poster who is bashing AHC. Sounds like the PP must have had a bad experience with AHC and moved her daughter to HC and has a bone to pick now. Bottom line, neither school's matriculations are that impressive. I don't know why the PP had to drag Bullis into the discussion.

Wow, you are really nasty. No wonder AHC has the reputation of having a culture of bullying. Moms like you breeding mean girls. You said HC has more wealth which contributes to them having better academics. Then in the next breath you say AHC is on the same level. You can’t have it both ways. You then complain a poster brought in Bullis (they did so to contradict your wealth argument) but you brought SR and Visi into the argument. You can’t keep track of your weak arguments and then get upset when others prove them wrong.

You have me confused with somebody else...but honestly you sound like the bully here.

Deflect, deflect. Just like a bully to gaslight. Yawn.

No, dear. You just don't want to accept that people see right through you. And clearly do not understand what bullying is. And that the name caller here is you.

Bless your heart you can dish it but not take it. Typical mean girl.

This was a different PP than the one you were responding to. Anonymous board, remember?

You can keep saying this nonsense, but it doesn't make it true. You seem really out of sorts. What happened to you that you come on a private school board and post things like this? So sad.