I’m a young woman who is a conservative Republican. AMA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP if you’re not going to answer all the questions just go back to r/redpillwomen

Op is not answering many of the questions. This is not a quality AMA.

Either a lack of honesty, or a naivete and lack of insight from any deeper thought on these questions. Take your pick.

Care to do better, OP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a fact that the new laws kicking into effect in red states are putting far too much liability and risk of potential prosecution on OB-GYNs and many of them are leaving red states.

How does OP reconcile that as being a good thing for young conservative women?

Why was this one not answered? You're fine with having less access to OB/GYN healthcare?

It’s unfortunate, but those are statistical anomalies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a fact that the new laws kicking into effect in red states are putting far too much liability and risk of potential prosecution on OB-GYNs and many of them are leaving red states.

How does OP reconcile that as being a good thing for young conservative women?

Why was this one not answered? You're fine with having less access to OB/GYN healthcare?

It’s unfortunate, but those are statistical anomalies.

Assuming you’re OP, I look forward to when you become a “statistical anomaly.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you from the south?
Christian?
Low income?
Controlling father?

1-I’m from a former industrial town in the Northeast. I go to college in DC.
2-Roman Catholic
3-Low 100,000s HHI
4-Some people would probably call him “controlling,” but I think he is better described as being a strong captain of the household

Did your "captain of the household" dad graduate from college?
Are you white?

Graduated from trade school
Yes

Ok, you fit the mold. You come from Blue collar white low to middle income Catholic family, with Daddy as head of household, Mother was homemaker. But, dear, it's time to read a book, get out there, pull your head out of your bottom, and see how the world actually works, not what your church dictates.
Now, about those families you care so much about? Why did this demographic hand their kids over to systemstic pedophilia, but worry about single parenthood or gay parents?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a lot of youthful naïveté in the op’s wishlist. Increase fatherhood? Yeah, dude. Good luck with that on a national level. Sht in one hand and wish in another and see which one fills up first.

I believe that welfare and abortion contribute to fatherlessness.

Just say you think black folks are the cause for a lot of issues. We can read between the lines..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As the title states, I am a young woman (a college student) who generally votes straight-ticket Republican.

Good for you. But, your policies are affecting my daughter and for that I will always revile you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As the title states, I am a young woman (a college student) who generally votes straight-ticket Republican.

May you rot in Hell with the rest of the traitors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a lot of youthful naïveté in the op’s wishlist. Increase fatherhood? Yeah, dude. Good luck with that on a national level. Sht in one hand and wish in another and see which one fills up first.

I believe that welfare and abortion contribute to fatherlessness.

What does this mean? So you think starving babies is all right and rape or incest victims forced to carry the rapists bastard is o.k.? You are an idiot. May you receive all the things you do richly deserved and may they come soon and in spades.

[Anonymous]

OP, are you a kinist?

[Anonymous]

OP, you are not doing much to convince me that there’s a whole lot of critical thinking among Republicans.

[Anonymous]

This is a very eye-opening thread. A lot of noble ideas, name calling, generalized disdain and virtue signaling from people who claim to be morally superior

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's a fact that the new laws kicking into effect in red states are putting far too much liability and risk of potential prosecution on OB-GYNs and many of them are leaving red states.

How does OP reconcile that as being a good thing for young conservative women?

Can you please stop asking serious questions? It might cause op to seriously consider actual consequences and stop blankly throwing out platitudes about virtue and how things “should be”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you a trump supporter? Or a “conservative R” of the old school branch?

If you are the former, why?

If the latter, how do you see the party purging this new harmful wing?

I did not vote for Trump in 2020 (first time I was old enough to vote in a presidential election) in either the primary or the general. However, I would say that I lean somewhat more his way than the way of old-school Rs.

There are some specific policies that I think need to be implemented. Regarding college, I think Parent Plus Loans, in particular, need to stop being given out completely, and Graduate Plus Loans need to have hard caps on how much can be given out. I think that for future students, student loan interest rates for federal loans should be increased.

I support American Exceptionalism. I want this country to prioritize increasing the birthrate, and to phase out DACA. Drastically increase marriage rates and decrease fatherlessness, which is the cause of so many of the issues we face today.

Really? This just makes the burden greater as young adults are starting out in the world. Seems like a 1% interest or no interest for solely educational use is the better, ore equitable way to go.

Nope, it would reduce tuition and force colleges to cut costs and jobs because students would be less willing to take out a gazillion dollars in loans.

Tuition is high because states stopped funding it.

Yes because universities started adding a bunch of ridiculous amenities and majors. Cut services and then I’ll support more funding.

Cut service and people won't want to attend. Death spiral.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you a trump supporter? Or a “conservative R” of the old school branch?

If you are the former, why?

If the latter, how do you see the party purging this new harmful wing?

I did not vote for Trump in 2020 (first time I was old enough to vote in a presidential election) in either the primary or the general. However, I would say that I lean somewhat more his way than the way of old-school Rs.

There are some specific policies that I think need to be implemented. Regarding college, I think Parent Plus Loans, in particular, need to stop being given out completely, and Graduate Plus Loans need to have hard caps on how much can be given out. I think that for future students, student loan interest rates for federal loans should be increased.

I support American Exceptionalism. I want this country to prioritize increasing the birthrate, and to phase out DACA. Drastically increase marriage rates and decrease fatherlessness, which is the cause of so many of the issues we face today.

Really? This just makes the burden greater as young adults are starting out in the world. Seems like a 1% interest or no interest for solely educational use is the better, ore equitable way to go.

Nope, it would reduce tuition and force colleges to cut costs and jobs because students would be less willing to take out a gazillion dollars in loans.

Tuition is high because states stopped funding it.

Yes because universities started adding a bunch of ridiculous amenities and majors. Cut services and then I’ll support more funding.

What makes you qualified to decide what amenities and majors are ridiculous?

Do you think American society doesn't need arts and humanities majors?

Major in whatever you want, but you shouldn’t be allowed to get government loans for those majors.

So you want government to be selective and discriminatory about what majors it will or won't major? Who gets to decide that? I thought you were for limited government, which in this case, means either zero government loans (which undermines the viability of a future workforce) or loans for anyone who qualifies, regardless of anything other than ability to qualify.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, to me it seems a key theme of the left is to defend the vulnerable and to punch up at the rich and powerful. The left looks out for the poor, for minorities, whether non-white, non-hetero, non-Christians and others, tries to help protect workers against exploitation, is pro-regulation to make sure products are safe, banks are trustworthy and so on, tries to protect the environment and things which affect the everyday person, while holding big corporations accountable and trying to tax the richest who got rich by exploiting the rest of us.

The right on the other hand tends to be the exact opposite, and more about punching down and protecting the rich and powerful, while punching down at minorities and the vulnerable, attacking migrants, blaming the poor for their poverty, attacking anyone who isn't like them.

As a Catholic, how do you reconcile all of these very un-Christlike behaviors of American conservatives?

Care to take a stab at a genuine answer?

Your forgot the left also supports a strong middle class and a strong worker protections so the rich and big business cannot be too exploitive. That's kind of important in the context of your post. Dems want a free and fair society regardless of race, gender, exual orientation, religion etc.

The modern GOP is discirminatory against anyone not white, male and Christian. Hard to defend in a heterogenus society and culture without being oppressive.