I think Kim K needs to be cancelled

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I knew that antisemitism was on the rise, but it's really eye opening to see all the excuses here for why Kim shouldn't have to let people know that she doesn't support it.

No what is eye opening is the blatant sexism. Her comments condemning anti semitism in October when this ramped up were widely reported on.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/10/25/kim-kardashian-kanye-ye-antisemitism/

Finally someone posts this. It only took four pages. (I'm the pp with the substack)

Trump's silence is far more worrisome.

And all it took was googling “Kim kardashian antisemitism” So pps are both sexist and extremely lazy

[Anonymous]

Sigh.

Surely you aren’t suggesting canceling someone for the actions of another.

Get a grip.

[Anonymous]

As useless as this post is, I’m still trying to figure out why OP GIVES A FV$ck about Kim K and why she thinks Kim need to apologize for a gross a$$ man that she is no longer married to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She never should have had an audience in the first place, but America is a dumbed-down low class society.

This

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As useless as this post is, I’m still trying to figure out why OP GIVES A FV$ck about Kim K and why she thinks Kim need to apologize for a gross a$$ man that she is no longer married to?

Why is op not suggesting we cancel the Jerry Springer show

[Anonymous]

Been saying this since the early 00’s. She not.

[Anonymous]

Wouldn't Kim K have been more selective about choosing a man to marry and father her children, given her family's history with violent domestic abuse re: Nicole Brown Simpson?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't Kim K have been more selective about choosing a man to marry and father her children, given her family's history with violent domestic abuse re: Nicole Brown Simpson?

Sounds like an accusation that you could throw at every divorced woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't Kim K have been more selective about choosing a man to marry and father her children, given her family's history with violent domestic abuse re: Nicole Brown Simpson?

Ah so now KK is responsible for her dead father's choice to represent another crappy man. It isn't the the son shall bear the sins of the father, it is, 'the woman should bear the sins of every man in her life'

[Anonymous]

Kim should be cancelled but not because of Kanye. She should be cancelled for her decades of cultural appropriation, long history of heavily borrowing from other peoples work for her various ventures, and telling women that declined to eff a b-list celeb for fame to get up and work.

Additional reasons why she sucks but don’t seem cancellable: getting her gross attack dog Jonathan Cheban to slut shame and then complaining about slut shaming that impacts her, lying about becoming a lawyer for clout, lukewarm rejection of balenciaga, etc

[Anonymous]

I'd cancel Tucker Carlson first.

Kim K is someone who married into fame and really turned being Paris Hilton's assistant into a big life of being famous. She's good at controlling the media's perception of her and is a bit like Taylor Swift in that regard.

Good on her. She's not my cup of tea and she looks like a robot but I hope she finds peace. She seems like someone who is struggling to find the things that make her happy. Wearing Marilyn's dress, calling a teen singer a snake, etc. I'd list more but I blessedly have never seen her show and didn't know who she was until last year.

I do think it weird that OP keeps starting threads on this topic, though.

[Anonymous]

OP is a troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What worries me is the four kids he's produced - which one/how many of them will wind up mentally ill having inherited it from him?

This. I wish more mentally unstable people thought about passing along their genes before reproducing. I wish my parents had.

It's why I choose to be childfree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What worries me is the four kids he's produced - which one/how many of them will wind up mentally ill having inherited it from him?

This. I wish more mentally unstable people thought about passing along their genes before reproducing. I wish my parents had.

It's why I choose to be childfree.

Who has the perfect genes, though? While I'm not bipolar I have family who is, and yet I reproduced. I just don't think having bipolar disorder means you shouldn't have kids. Everyone has something, you know? Why is bipolar so much worse to pass on than cancer or dementia?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What worries me is the four kids he's produced - which one/how many of them will wind up mentally ill having inherited it from him?

This. I wish more mentally unstable people thought about passing along their genes before reproducing. I wish my parents had.

It's why I choose to be childfree.

Who has the perfect genes, though? While I'm not bipolar I have family who is, and yet I reproduced. I just don't think having bipolar disorder means you shouldn't have kids. Everyone has something, you know? Why is bipolar so much worse to pass on than cancer or dementia?

The fact that you asked that is very scary.