I guess it’s possible that some doctors are needlessly bringing people in but often the standard of care requires reassessment. They have an ethical and professional responsibility to provide appropriate follow up (not to mention they are risk of being sued should they “just send in a refill” inappropriately.) |
I will say this in defense of surgeons.. they can practice medicine for a much shorter time span, so they have a shorter earning window. And of course drs are not altruistic-- they routinely deny pain meds to people of color even when they know that there are underlying conditions that cause pain and that melanin can protect against sun burn but not physical pain. Defensive medicine is also really bad for patients but that is what they practice.. no-one wants to get sued. The compensation system in the US is cancerous, even the most kind person is going to get caught up. I say this as someone who has ton of physicians in my family and social circle- friends in Australia, Uk and here, lost of Canadian drs who have come here as well as a few in the EU. The US system is bad for morale but they do make a shit ton of $$ comparatively. Drs trained here also are so likely to deny women maternal care.. I hear horror stories all the time about drs trained elsewhere who had to fight their us trained colleagues to give mothers appropriate care but then the NHS ones laugh and say that the maternal care in UK is a horror story for pretty much all women its so bare bones so .. |
I have an HMO and the medications that I've been on for years are just automatically mailed with no need to see a doctor to sign off. |
I think you are confused. The reason why they are sent to you is because the doctor writes a script for 90 days with three refills. These are likely for medicines like BP meds that you have been on for awhile. The doctor still has to see you at regular intervals. |
I'm also a nurse and I completely agree. Also-some doctors can be outright jerks and have big egos but be really good at what they do, especially surgeons. |
|
I can't speak for all doctors but I will say that my mom spent her career in family medicine and OB/GYN. She was basically forced into retirement as her health declined and she faced more age discrimination, but she hung on as long as she could because of her patients. She did everything for her patients. She arguably chose her patients over her own children at some points. She made multiple trips to impoverished places, including extremely dangerous locations, to provide health care to people in dire need. She even testified against the abusive husband of one of her patients once...to protect her patient. She didn't take pharma kickbacks and she obviously treated people who were not insured.
Is that altruism? Was she motivated by helping people, or by how helping people made her feel? Knowing my mother I think it was mostly altruism and doing what was right. I'm sure it made her feel good, too. But at that point, does it even matter? I don't know what the dividing line would be -- if you saved X number of lives and did Y humanitarian aid missions to Z countries, then you're altruistic -- that's rather ridiculous. But clearly altruistic doctors exist. |
I can think of plenty that don’t get paid enough for their education and efforts. |
People call my doctor husband after two years of not coming into the office demanding a refill. Of course, he has to ask that they visit first. He has a responsibility to prescribe meds responsibly and ethically as the above poster stated. Happens all the time. He does not charge co-pays to those who cannot afford the co-pay. Very altrustic. And no, he isn't making the salary of most of these law firm partners running around here and works harder. |
In the US, this is a felony, unless he is NOT charging insurance for the insurance part of payment. You cannot legally charge the insurance and not charge the copay if the copay is a part of the contractual agreement between the insurer and the patient -- this violates the Federal False Claims Act. |
Huh what? Really? Another way of looking at it is that he’s opting not to collect on medical debt (which would Be his choice), which I understand is different than just not charging copays. Is it really illegal For a doctor to just take whatever insurance gives them and let the patient off the hook on the copay?!??? I guess I understand the rationale - that it would lessen the likelihood of false claims, but if that’s really the law then the law is wrong. A doctor should be able to choose whether to bill a patient. The patient’s copay has no bearing on what the insurance will pay because they pay assuming that the patient was Charged. |
This seems not to be the case: https://www.whistleblowerllc.com/copay-waiver/ |
BTW do you practice in this area of law? If so then this concerns me. It took me about 35 seconds on google to figure out your claim was not true. I wish people would think before calling someone else a felon. But. this is the internet after all. |
|
Doctors order unnecessary tests. I know someone who went to see a dr regarding pain in his leg, dr sent him to the ER because of a suspected blood clot, which proved to be false
All that hassle, expense and wait all for nothing Might as well not have gone to a dr, since the pain is still there |
Agree with this! |
Appropriate follow up would be great. I’ve had doctors ask me to come back after 30 days. Makes sense if the meds are causing side effects and I need to shift to something else. I don’t see how anything more than a phone call is necessary if the medicine is working. Why do I need to take time off work for a five minute visit that costs more than $100? What health care is being provided in that scenario? People should be able to sign waivers for low risk medications so they can be bought over the counter. |