|
Everyone has had work and tweets done.
Kate Beckensale has been known to have had tons of work done and you can’t even tell. |
This is so untrue. Kerry Washington, Halle Berry, Angela Basset, Beyoncé….They’ve all had work done. |
I just started watching season 2 of The Morning Show and it took me forever to recognize Julianna Margulies. Is it because she's had a lot of work done or the opposite?
|
lol, me too. He has no idea and is critical of it. I've been getting it 4 times a year for 10 years. I am never completely frozen--I actually can't freeze my forehead. I don't respond that well to the neurotoxins--I always retain partial mobility. |
I think maybe Annette Benning is close to natural; she has jowls.
Lack of jowls/sagging is often a clear sign that a "natural" celebrity has had a face and/or neck lift. Their skin will be wrinkled (eye crinkles, forehead wrinkles) but their jawline completely clean and youthful. This doesn't happen naturally. It looks "natural" (no weird fillers or frozen face) but it's anything but. |
It is extremely obvious that Kate Beckinsale has had tons of work done. Her before and after nose look nothing like each other. But she had it done fairly young so people forget. She is beautiful but very “done” looking. |
Honestly, I kind of feel like this is the way to do it. Taking notes for myself in a few years! |
|
Just wanted to comment on "the "subtle Botox" you get done probably doesn't improve your appearance to others as much as you think it does." This might sound corny/unrealistic, but isn't feeling better about yourself at least half the game? If the person who gets it feels better about how they look, that is probably all that actually matters...assuming you aren't a 35+ actress still trying to get a job that is...
|
I think both. Some of this is just aging around the eyes and so on, but there's def injectables going on. |
DP. First of all, you don't seem to understand that it's visible and strange if it's visible and strange. I highly doubt you work for a dermatologist or an aesthetician. You don't know people's medical history. Your logic seems to be that it is always, inevitably, visible and strange. But the only way to know that would be to do run a more "blind" experiment. Look at 100 people, decide whom you think has had it done, and be presented with objective evidence of who actually has. You've presented zero evidence that disproves my hypothesis-- which is that you pretty much only notice the noticeable Botox. How do you know that my hypothesis isn't true, besides your own belief? If you are really looking for it, I will concede that you can often tell if someone got Botox in the last month or so, especially in the forehead. There are a lot of conditions, though-- mostly just certain areas, people who either get a lot or metabolize it a certain way, they pretty much just got it, etc. But by definition, most people you see with Botox are more than a month out, and have regained more natural movement. At that point, it's more of a reduction in movement than freezing-- if it ever was for that person. It usually literally just looks like they looked 10-20 years earlier. They raise their eyebrows, and their brows go up, but the lines you see just look less etched in, less deep. But that brings up another point-- a lot of people who get it are in their early 40s, 30s-- sometimes even their 20s-- so the difference between what you'd expect without Botox and what you're seeing with a little (maybe prophylactic) is not going to be profound. This also goes for darker-skinned women. And it's also true if you've known someone for a while and they've been doing a little for a long time, they may just appear to be aging slowly, which some people naturally do. Plus, your analogy is not based on what's being exchanged here. While it's true and logical to state that you can't be an expert in how you look to other people, this is not what's happening: "People keep telling me this is dress looks hideous on me, but I'M the one wearing it so I know best how it looks." It could happen, but your analogy assumes facts not in evidence-- wildly not in evidence, in fact. What's happening in this conversation, anyway, is more like: "PP who has never seen me is telling me they KNOW my yellow dress looks hideous on me, because all people who wear yellow dresses look hideous. But everyone IRL who does comment tells me I look fabulous in yellow, and I think I look fabulous. So even though everyone could be lying to me, and maybe some are, I'm guessing my account is more likely to be accurate." Ah, I had time today. |
Basically, how do you KNOW the people you don't think had Botox have actually not had Botox? |
Yes, but obviously, not for the same anti-aging purposes as white actresses, and not the same degree/intensity. |
Maybe a facelift. |
I am not the PP you are responding to. People like you are the problem. A different opinion from yours must mean they are bitter and jealous? If people don't want to have cosmetic work done they must be stodgy and afraid? Please get over yourself. The vitriol in the world is all directed at people who don't focus on appearance. You call them "stodgy" or "frumpy" or tell them they are "letting themselves go". etc etc etc. You all are just nasty. The fallacy is the BS that you have been brainwashed with by the beauty industry so that they can make money. It's really that simple. No one *needs* any of this nonsense, but there are plenty of people like you in the world who are ready to insult people who age naturally. Honestly F off. We are not jealous of you. We are annoyed by you. |
| Jennifer Lopez looks natural! |