Did the god of the bible kill people?

[Anonymous]

Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point

pp here. what verses?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point

pp here. what verses?

Any of the ones in the OPs link

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point

op’s linked website states God is a fictional character and the Bible is man-made, and non/believers should avoid taking any moral lessons from the Bible.

Why should anyone try to “prove” anything? Nobody cares! op and company already have their minds made up…and that’s fine. Anyone debating them is wasting time and mental space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God was loving to Adam and Eve. They disobeyed Him. He didn’t kill them.

But he petulantly turned away from them and cast humans from the "garden of eden" to suffer and die without experiencing his presence. Some might say it was an overreaction.

Very few religions are creationist. Nearly all mainstream religions view this as an origin story, not a literal history. To pretend otherwise and argue as if all Christians are creationist is disingenuous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point

op’s linked website states God is a fictional character and the Bible is man-made, and non/believers should avoid taking any moral lessons from the Bible.

Why should anyone try to “prove” anything? Nobody cares! op and company already have their minds made up…and that’s fine. Anyone debating them is wasting time and mental space.

You’ve worked very hard to avoid answering the question. The reason is because your bible says exactly what this web site illustrates, and you are trying to distract from that fact.

That’s pretty obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point

op’s linked website states God is a fictional character and the Bible is man-made, and non/believers should avoid taking any moral lessons from the Bible.

Why should anyone try to “prove” anything? Nobody cares! op and company already have their minds made up…and that’s fine. Anyone debating them is wasting time and mental space.

You’ve worked very hard to avoid answering the question. The reason is because your bible says exactly what this web site illustrates, and you are trying to distract from that fact.

That’s pretty obvious.

DP. See the post right above yours, which isn’t mine btw.

[Anonymous]

David Thorstad, a prominent atheist, founded the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) to advocate for pedophilia and pererasty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:David Thorstad, a prominent atheist, founded the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) to advocate for pedophilia and pererasty.

Yeah we hate that guy too. Howzabout you disown your monsters and conspirators? We’re waiting…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?

Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.

How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?

No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution

Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point

op’s linked website states God is a fictional character and the Bible is man-made, and non/believers should avoid taking any moral lessons from the Bible.

Why should anyone try to “prove” anything? Nobody cares! op and company already have their minds made up…and that’s fine. Anyone debating them is wasting time and mental space.

You’ve worked very hard to avoid answering the question. The reason is because your bible says exactly what this web site illustrates, and you are trying to distract from that fact.

That’s pretty obvious.

DP. See the post right above yours, which isn’t mine btw.

It does not even attempt to answer the question. Because all the Bibles say the same or similar terrible stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:David Thorstad, a prominent atheist, founded the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) to advocate for pedophilia and pererasty.

Yeah we hate that guy too. Howzabout you disown your monsters and conspirators? We’re waiting…

People of faith disown priest abusers every day on DCUM. But you knew that.