Actually read the studies. Much more effort has gone into proving that football is bad. |
Some professional soccer players have already indicated that they will donate their brains to science after their death so that the type of research done on NFL players can be done for other athletes. There is much we don’t know yet about the prevalence of CTE among professional athletes from boxing to soccer to hockey, and about how it affects men and women differently. |
Did you even read the article or the study? If that’s what you got out of it, you should try to read it again more critically. What someone did was study a group of people who were exhibiting signs of CTE and then prove that a certain percentage of them actually had CTE. That’s like saying out of 100 people who have symptoms of heart disease, 95 of them actually have heart disease. Not a big surprise. They had no control group. They did no analysis of the number of football players that didn’t exhibit symptoms, etc. it was really a horrible study and was picked up by the media to prove that football was bad. And a lot of dumb people fell for it. |
I’m not a moron. No thanks. |
More cases are showing up in rugby, and more mothers are refusing to allow their kids to play rugby. Yesterday I happened to be watching Commonwealth Games coverage and they showed some boxing. I can't believe that kind of violent activity still exists. |
People will believe what they want to believe jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2787601?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=123021 Saying no to football makes them feel like good parents, but they refuse to admit that saying yes to the other sports carries a similar risk profile. Its called denial |
This is really funny, to any of us who have had sons go through the Vienna program. VYI is one of the most impressive programs around when it comes to strict safety protocols. I’m not sure when this was or what team you are referring to, but I never saw a lot of injuries in any of our years. As for Hooters, where is the Hooters in this area? That’s a first. I laughed out loud at that one. If it was true, what’s wrong with the parents for driving them there? During my son’s last year in 8th grade, he would have loved it if a coach suggested that. Nothing similar ever happened. There were some potluck tailgates after practice organized by parents but that’s about it. Check out VYI and look at their safety protocols yourself if you live in the area. |
First PP here. I agree, and I think we'll know much more over the next 10 years or so as more athletes agree to have their brains examined. The current research isn't limited to football players but I think there are various reasons why thus far only football players' brains have been examined. |
This is the perfect example. People hear some crazy anecdote (an adult taking kids to Hooters?) and then quickly get up in arms about the dangers of football. No, that's the danger of a bad coach (if the story is even true). And especially, after the last 2 decades, the focus on safety in youth football is crazy. Not just in equipment, but in the enforcement of proper tackling techniques. I think, as these safety trends continue, coupled with the same scrutiny as other sports, we'll see that modern day youth tackle football is only marginally more dangerous than other youth sports. In fact, that JAMA article above already highlighted that trend. Now, D1 and Pro football is a whole different situation, with 350lb men hitting each other. But youth? I just don't think the risk is high enough to warrant denying the experience to a kid |
DP. It's not the same risk profile across sports, though. And science and medicine don't yet know why some people get CTE while others who engaged in the same activity don't. You're unlikely to ever have a control group for any CTE study any time soon because it would mean that healthy people would need to donate their brains when they die. But that doesn't mean it's "denial" or a bad study that should be ignored. Head injuries and CTE among football players aren't new problems. It's not about making ourselves feel like "good parents" by saying no. The potential risk of serious brain damage isn't worth it for a lot of families. You don't know if your kid will be fine or if his brain will get rattled one too many times playing football and end up with a host of issues by the time he's 20. |
The denial comes in when they think they are doing anything substantial to really reduce the risk by making the kid play soccer instead of football. Yes, a very slight reduction in risk. But marginal. A lot of the anti-football sentiment is really against the culture, but disguised as concerns about 'safety.' And in reality, the culture of football is amongst the best and most welcoming. I would put it at the top of the list. And competitive baseball at the bottom |
There is no way I would let my kid play tackle football at any age whatsoever. |
It's not SIMILAR. It's a risk, but it is not a SIMILAR risk for my kid to play basketball. It's just not. Stop wasting our time with your ridiculous argument that not wanting to play tackle football is virtue signalling. You're being an idiot. We all know it's MORE dangerous. Just give it up, PP. |
Because not as many people play rugby in this country. |
This thread is about youth football. A poster shares an article by JAMA (literally a journal of medicine) finding no relationships between brain injury and youth football. But you just KNOW its more dangerous. ![]() Honestly guys, go to a youth football practice or a game. You'd be shocked by how timid and non-violent they are. Your kids get more head injuries on the playground at this age So yeah, maybe its not virtual signaling. But if its not virtual signaling, its just stupidity then. |