States with no exemptions for life of mother

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have no words.


"Any person who willfully seeks to destroy the life of another person, by any means, at any stage of life, or succeeds in doing so, shall be held accountable for attempted murder or for first degree murder, respectively. Any person has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person, even by the use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person. "


Sooooo can a pregnant woman file an assault claim against a fetus if she feels it's threatening her life? Can the woman get an abortion and say it was self defense?


WOW.


DP.. no, what the woman should do is destroy the life in defense of the woman's life.

"Any person (pregnant woman) has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person (the fetus), even by the use of deadly force if necessary,"

There are medical cases where the fetus is a danger to the woman's life. That should be a clear cut case of medically necessary abortion to save the woman's life.

Extrapolating further, any pregnancy has a statistically higher risk of death for the woman than any abortion, so…
Anonymous
the GOP goal is to get women out of the work force and back to exclusively raising babies

Republicans said it out loud again ladies.
Matt Birk is doubling down on the position he has outlined in speeches to fellow right-wing loons that women shouldn’t work.
This solves their problem. If women can't work, they need men-- and men don't have to worry about being rejected.
Again vote Red this is what will happen. Your call.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: