Oh no it's a locally normed 15% so relative to their home school. |
DC won the lottery last year. None of their magnet teachers are new so guessing that's the same. Overall they've loved the program. My old kid also went through it and as far as we can tell it's the same as ever. |
No, that is not right. |
| Glad I don't have to hand wring over this because my kid is in the TPMS magnet, loves it, and is thriving. |
Yes, it's fewer than 300 even! TPMS has 1,162 students, https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/03755.pdf Each grade has 100 out of boundary magnet students. 1162 - 3 * 100 = 862 in boundary students Of the 862 there are 25 in-boundary magnet students per grade. Since there are 3 grades, there are a total of 75 in-boundary magnet students. The upper 15% of 862 is 129.3. The odds of an in-boundary kid in the top 15% getting selected is 75 / 129.3 or roughly 58%. |
We hesitated because of the long commute but my 7th grader loves it. I would definitely take the spot if I were you. My kid has never been as excited about school as they have been in the magnet! |
Pardon me if I’m a bit sour grapes that my out of boundary 99th percentile kid didn’t win the lottery, and these in bounds students have such a good chance at a seat in a program with so few overall seats. |
You could move to TKPK like we did. |
It is different. Whether it is good different or bad different for the program, only time will tell. Teachers are same and are good. |
You can buy our house. I hate it here. |
My kid who was 25 points above the 99% on their MAP-M in CES and with straight A's every single quarter who was also in-boundary didn't get in. This is the nature of lotteries. |
Your odds are much better but there's still no guarantee (these days). |
The 25 seats are from the school. They do not take away from the program. |
Like Blair SMCS, TPMS magnet program has 100 seats. The school sets aside 25 additional seats for in-boundary students. Blair should do the same. It would be a good way to expand the program without adding more students. |
I understand how it is set up. But there’s no consistency within MCPS. If my same 99 percentile third grader didn’t win the lottery for CES but attended a school with a CES program, she would not only not get an extra set of seats for inclusion in CES, but she also would lose access to an ELC class because the school already has a special program. I mean, I guess unless she lived in TKPK where there is some extra non-regional CES access there too? Between the criteria changes year after year, the norming and weighting of “standardized” scores and the lack of equivalent acceleration at non magnet programs, I think MCPS should ask itself a lot of questions as to why these opportunities are being rationed when the cost to expand them isn’t really an issue. |