The Trump women and their fashion mishaps thread part deux

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The boots say IDGAF.

Whodathunk our First Lady would wear thigh-high boots?

She’s not my First Lady. She is a mistake.

Her shoes have red soles!! That is a fancy and expensive brand of shoe. She is awful and tone deaf to wear those. They probably cost more than rent for most people. I saw this in a photo of her boarding the chopper.

He has lost so much weight from covid but still manages to look like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man.

Take away the heels and she would be 5'6". So my vote is fauxlania.

Every time I think that the Fauxlania stuff is just a joke, and it can’t be possible, someone here makes a very compelling point...

[Anonymous]

You are so right about the heels. She isn't that much shorter than him in lower heels. HMMM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The boots say IDGAF.

Whodathunk our First Lady would wear thigh-high boots?

She’s not my First Lady. She is a mistake.

Her shoes have red soles!! That is a fancy and expensive brand of shoe. She is awful and tone deaf to wear those. They probably cost more than rent for most people. I saw this in a photo of her boarding the chopper.

He has lost so much weight from covid but still manages to look like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man.

Take away the heels and she would be 5'6". So my vote is fauxlania.

Every time I think that the Fauxlania stuff is just a joke, and it can’t be possible, someone here makes a very compelling point...

Me too! And here’s Mel in flats (we can see her squints, so we know it’s her) and DT. The height difference is about the same as Fauxlania is those huge ass heels.

[Anonymous]

^^^

[Anonymous]

Was she wearing flats for real in that pic? I have never seen her in flats. I thought she had Barbie feet for real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^

While I remember that outfit, I don’t think I saw a full body shot like this. Who wears flats with that length of dress?!

I will never cease to be baffled by these women, who have infinite resources for everything from clothes, make up, hair, and even plastic surgery. Why? Just why?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Fauxlania? She looks much slimmer around the midsection here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^

Her face looks like a female clone of Trump here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ivanka volunteers in Miami - hands out food to “the poors;” no mention of how much her dress costs.

Makes me think of Eva Peron...played by Madonna:

I’m sorry...love her or hate her, it’s never okay to compare Madonna to Ivanka. Even in a movie where she’s playing someone else.

Ivanka, at best, is a dollar store knock-off of Madonna.

It’s not about Madonna. It’s about Eva Peron and her popularity with the real people. This is the look and vibe Ivanka is going for with this outfit as she passes out food to the poors: modern Eva Peron.

#gross

What's up with the shoulders/sleeves? Too big so falling off her shoulders? Surely that can't be design.

Guurl, it's because in order to get something to fit across the bust, she has to order a size larger. It can either fit her bust or through the shoulders, not both since she won't have her clothes tailored.

Yes, exactly. And let’s just be grateful for the rare instance when she manages to put on something that fits her chest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^

Her face looks like a female clone of Trump here.

This reminds me of the saying: “If you can’t be a good example, you’ll just have to be a terrible warning.” Stay away from plastic surgery and fillers, ladies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^

Her face looks like a female clone of Trump here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The boots say IDGAF.

Whodathunk our First Lady would wear thigh-high boots?

She’s not my First Lady. She is a mistake.

Her shoes have red soles!! That is a fancy and expensive brand of shoe. She is awful and tone deaf to wear those. They probably cost more than rent for most people. I saw this in a photo of her boarding the chopper.

He has lost so much weight from covid but still manages to look like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man.

Take away the heels and she would be 5'6". So my vote is fauxlania.

Every time I think that the Fauxlania stuff is just a joke, and it can’t be possible, someone here makes a very compelling point...

Me too! And here’s Mel in flats (we can see her squints, so we know it’s her) and DT. The height difference is about the same as Fauxlania is those huge ass heels.

When you see side by side pics, you can really tell the difference in the noses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^

Her face looks like a female clone of Trump here.

I nearly choked on my Christmas bourbon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^

Is this photoshopped? It just looks weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another coat, for the focking Chreeeezmas tree lighting. Boy they sure do love that balcony.

Seriously, why does she have a coat for every outfit? Especially such a mediocre one.

Very Spiegel 1994.

I loved Spiegel but I’m not rich. It’s blah for her.