Jeffrey Epstein's Little Saint James (private island)

[Anonymous]

What do you know about it? How many times did the Clintons visit there?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Saint_James%2C_U.S._Virgin_Islands

[Anonymous]

You seem to have overlooked the obvious, which is that Trump has a woman who has accused him of raping her at the age of 13 while at Epstein's house.

[Anonymous]

That woman's lawsuit was bogus and she has now dropped it for a second time.

[Anonymous]

Bill Clinton went there over 20 times,several times without SS detail. You can google it and see the plane's manifests listing who was on board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you know about it? How many times did the Clintons visit there?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Saint_James%2C_U.S._Virgin_Islands

He's traveled there many, many times. Jeffrey Epstein donated to the Clinton Foundation but once he was convicted of child molestation, they cut ties, supposedly. He would host elaborate parties which - according to some sources - included children as young as 12 who would "service the guests." prominent folks - Prince Edward for one. But many rode his Lolita Express - supposedly on humanitarian trips. Kevin Spacey was one such guest.

Lolita Express was named after the popular figure, as his plane has a room where people could participate in orgies with these young girls who were recruited by a woman who worked for Epstein. I believe one of Epstein's girls - now a woman - came forward to state that she had seen Bill on his island but nothing more. And there was one who dropped the suit claiming that Trump raped her at 13.

It's all out there - but not in sources of which DCUM would approve. However, Huff Post did cover Epstein w/o going deeply into his connections with Bill Clinton (and Hillary, for that matter).

"Conspiracy" sources are trying to connect Epstein and Clinton to a child sex trafficking ring. The name Laura Silsby comes up as one who attempted to take 33 children out of Haiti in 2010, but she didn't have proper paperwork. The Clinton Foundation, big into the "humanitarian" effort there, apparently was interested in Silsby's New Life Children's Refuge case. To what extent is anyone's guess.

So there were some Wikileaks around that. Silsby was apparently in great debt here in the States. So they were trying to connect her desire to "save these children" (She took them from intact families.) to an abduction scheme in order to make money.

She was detained for a few months, I believe, and her colleagues were set free. But Huma was apparently sending info on her ministry. So there was communication about her specific situation during Hillary's tenure at the State Dept. Aside from the Wikileaks, there was one academic journal article (Harvard Human Rights Journal) that highlighted Silsby's case. So that was as credible as they come. It mentioned that some legal adviser, Jorge Puello, wanted to represent her, but he was under investigation for sex trafficking, too. So it didn't look too good for Silsby!

So yeah - I followed these incidents, but there's been no strong connection to any sexual misconduct on Bill's part with the Epstein ordeal, and although they tried to connect to Silsby to the Clinton Foundation being used as a front for sex trafficking that connection was weak as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That woman's lawsuit was bogus and she has now dropped it for a second time.

After death threats. You don't know it's bogus.

[Anonymous]

Here is a more recent article of Bill's flights on the Lolita Express - http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html

Fox News - so . . .

Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

“Bill Clinton … associated with a man like Jeffrey Epstein, who everyone in New York, certainly within his inner circles, knew was a pedophile,” said Conchita Sarnoff, of the Washington, D.C. based non-profit Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking, and author of a book on the Epstein case called "TrafficKing." “Why would a former president associate with a man like that?”

[Anonymous]

You sad dogs are back to talking abou Bill when your own candidate went there?

[Anonymous]

They spend a lot of time digging up flight manifests while ignoring an actual accuser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You sad dogs are back to talking abou Bill when your own candidate went there?

If there's evidence that a potential First Man and Madam President have ties to a convicted pedophile, I would be worried. After all, she's in the lead, no?

The Clintons and Trumps were friendly - attended weddings together, I believe. So both sides - one can assume - were also very friendly with Epstein. But Epstein donated to the Clinton Foundation, and there were indeed flight logs showing Bill was on the Lolita Express.

I'd say that's alarming. Billary is a package deal. That's the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You sad dogs are back to talking abou Bill when your own candidate went there?

If there's evidence that a potential First Man and Madam President have ties to a convicted pedophile, I would be worried. After all, she's in the lead, no?

The Clintons and Trumps were friendly - attended weddings together, I believe. So both sides - one can assume - were also very friendly with Epstein. But Epstein donated to the Clinton Foundation, and there were indeed flight logs showing Bill was on the Lolita Express.

I'd say that's alarming. Billary is a package deal. That's the problem.

+ 1,000,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You sad dogs are back to talking abou Bill when your own candidate went there?

If there's evidence that a potential First Man and Madam President have ties to a convicted pedophile, I would be worried. After all, she's in the lead, no?

The Clintons and Trumps were friendly - attended weddings together, I believe. So both sides - one can assume - were also very friendly with Epstein. But Epstein donated to the Clinton Foundation, and there were indeed flight logs showing Bill was on the Lolita Express.

I'd say that's alarming. Billary is a package deal. That's the problem.

LOL. Again, for you slow pokes: your candidate is an accused child rapist; I'd probably quit trying to get ahead by reminding people Epstein exists. I know you partisans think "Billary" is a package deal, but I can assure you that no one wants an accused child rapist in the Oval Office.

Except maybe you do. Maybe some of you secretly aspire to be like Donald this way, too. Gross. Add "pervert" to the list of reason you guys are so gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You sad dogs are back to talking abou Bill when your own candidate went there?

If there's evidence that a potential First Man and Madam President have ties to a convicted pedophile, I would be worried. After all, she's in the lead, no?

The Clintons and Trumps were friendly - attended weddings together, I believe. So both sides - one can assume - were also very friendly with Epstein. But Epstein donated to the Clinton Foundation, and there were indeed flight logs showing Bill was on the Lolita Express.

I'd say that's alarming. Billary is a package deal. That's the problem.

LOL. Again, for you slow pokes: your candidate is an accused child rapist; I'd probably quit trying to get ahead by reminding people Epstein exists. I know you partisans think "Billary" is a package deal, but I can assure you that no one wants an accused child rapist in the Oval Office.

Except maybe you do. Maybe some of you secretly aspire to be like Donald this way, too. Gross. Add "pervert" to the list of reason you guys are so gross.

1. I did not vote for Donald or Hillary.
2. I've been following the Clintons' connection to Epstein for quite some time.
3. I've said that Trump and the Clintons run in the same circles, but unfortunately, you're not smart enough to see that there's more material out there connecting the foundation and Bill's trips to Epstein.

I'm surprised that a die hard Lib like you doesn't understand how to dig for some information - and certainly can't see that - for now - the Epstein/Clinton connection is MUCH STRONGER than the Trump/Epstein connection.

I agree that Trump is perverted. And let's push Bill aside since "he's not running for president." Taking money from a convicted pedophile (b/c he WAS convicted) is a perverted move on Hillary's part. But I guess you go through life with your blinders on, eh? blocking out ANY negative information about your gal

Come back when you have some significant information to share instead of attacking people who are questioning this connection.