Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Little Saint James (private island)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Jeffrey Epstein's Little Saint James (private island)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What do you know about it?  How many times did the Clintons visit there?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Saint_James%2C_U.S._Virgin_Islands[/quote]

He's traveled there many, many times.  Jeffrey Epstein donated to the Clinton Foundation but once he was convicted of child molestation, they cut ties, supposedly.  He would host elaborate parties which - according to some sources - included children as young as 12 who would "service the guests."   prominent folks - Prince Edward for one. But many rode his Lolita Express - supposedly on humanitarian trips.  Kevin Spacey was one such guest.

Lolita Express was named after the popular figure, as his plane has a room where people could participate in orgies  with these young girls who were recruited by a woman who worked for Epstein.  I believe one of Epstein's girls - now a woman - came forward to state that she had seen Bill on his island but nothing more.  And there was one who dropped the suit claiming that Trump raped her at 13.

It's all out there - but not in sources of which DCUM would approve.  However, Huff Post did cover Epstein w/o going deeply into his connections with Bill Clinton (and Hillary, for that matter).

"Conspiracy" sources are trying to connect Epstein and Clinton to a child sex trafficking ring.  The name Laura Silsby comes up as one who attempted to take 33 children out of Haiti in 2010, but she didn't have proper paperwork.  The Clinton Foundation, big into the "humanitarian" effort there, apparently was interested in Silsby's New Life Children's Refuge case.  To what extent is anyone's guess.

So there were some Wikileaks around that.  Silsby was apparently in great debt here in the States. So they were trying to connect her desire to "save these children" (She took them from intact families.) to an abduction scheme in order to make money.

She was detained for a few months, I believe, and her colleagues were set free.  But Huma was apparently sending info on her ministry. So there was communication about her specific situation during Hillary's tenure at the State Dept. Aside from the Wikileaks, there was one academic journal  article ([i]Harvard Human Rights Journal[/i])  that highlighted Silsby's case.  So that was as credible as they come.  It mentioned that some legal adviser, Jorge Puello, wanted to represent her, but he was under investigation for sex trafficking, too. So it didn't look too good for Silsby!

So yeah  - I followed these incidents, but there's been no strong connection to any sexual misconduct on Bill's part with the Epstein ordeal, and although they tried to connect to Silsby to the Clinton Foundation being used as a front for sex trafficking that connection was weak as well.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics