Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President Trump says he will be instructing Pam Bondi, the DOJ, and the FBI to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships and involvement with Bill Clinton, Harvard President Larry Summers, & Linkedln co-founder Reid Hoffman

Hoo boy!

Investigate Bill Gates too while you’re at it

Trump playing chess, democrats checkers.

Speaking of Bubba, Trump (or should we say Monica Jr.) and the Epstein files...

Be careful what you wish for.

Do you think that we are in a Clinton cult?

Democrats want to go after the pedos. The republicans want to protect the pedos that they like.

We are not the same.

I think you didn't get the context.

We should investigate all references to Bubba in the Epstein emails! Release the files!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting developments-
*trump called and requested meeting with Mac and bobert to try to get them on board - but they will vote YES to release Epstein files, despite pleading from trump to vote NO. He may be on his way to becoming a lame duck president in year 1 of his term.
*trump then threw a tantrum and is demanding admin to investigate OTHER people in relation to Epstein files - predictably Clinton, but surprisingly JP Morgan. Jp Morgan refused to donate to his ballroom. They have already publicly stated their regret for allowing Epstein as a client.

He is already a lame duck. He cannot run for another term.

All second-term Presidents are lame ducks but typically hold onto their influence for a while. PP is saying Trump is already starting to lose his. And they're right. The economy is rapidly becoming worse for the average American at the same time that Trump's pedophilia is making big news. The GOP has already started jockeying for what comes next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:President Trump says he will be instructing Pam Bondi, the DOJ, and the FBI to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships and involvement with Bill Clinton, Harvard President Larry Summers, & Linkedln co-founder Reid Hoffman

Hoo boy!

Investigate Bill Gates too while you’re at it

Trump playing chess, democrats checkers.

You still don't get it. If they are guilty, they should rot in jail. We want all guilty parties outed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Trial balloons to see what works. Republicans are focus grouping in real time.

Not one reedemable soul in the WH situation room meeting with Trump game planning a response to the release.

The sit room meets were to pressure Boebert and Mace, separately, into withdrawing their signatures on the 218 discharge petition so a vote could be averted. Those must have been horrendously high pressure meetings for these women. They bravely stood their ground. I don't agree with them on anything else, BTW.

They have earned my respect in this.

and MTG has surprised me, as well

[Anonymous]

“IN TEXT MESSAGES sent in 2017, disgraced financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein appears to position himself as a middleman between President Donald Trump’s administration and Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates, even seemingly representing himself as passing on information directly from Trump to Gates through an intermediary.
The messages, which the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released on Wednesday, originated with the Epstein estate. They begin on January 27, 2017, years after Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state prostitution solicitation charges. In them, Epstein purports to show intimate awareness of Trump’s plans for domestic and global public health policy, and to be directly familiar with the president’s thinking.
Trump has continued to claim, as recently as this summer, that he stopped speaking with Epstein around 2004.”

Liar liar pants on fire

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Trial balloons to see what works. Republicans are focus grouping in real time.

Not one reedemable soul in the WH situation room meeting with Trump game planning a response to the release.

The sit room meets were to pressure Boebert and Mace, separately, into withdrawing their signatures on the 218 discharge petition so a vote could be averted. Those must have been horrendously high pressure meetings for these women. They bravely stood their ground. I don't agree with them on anything else, BTW.

They have earned my respect in this.

and MTG has surprised me, as well

Honestly, it seems that women - even maga women - cannot sit by and let this slide. We may have found the one thing that makes MAGA wake up from the koolaid-induced slumber!
Can’t wait to see what happens when trump and Vance are quacking around their ballroom with no power at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Trial balloons to see what works. Republicans are focus grouping in real time.

Not one reedemable soul in the WH situation room meeting with Trump game planning a response to the release.

The sit room meets were to pressure Boebert and Mace, separately, into withdrawing their signatures on the 218 discharge petition so a vote could be averted. Those must have been horrendously high pressure meetings for these women. They bravely stood their ground. I don't agree with them on anything else, BTW.

They have earned my respect in this.

and MTG has surprised me, as well

It's not an anomaly any more. In each one of her public appearances, she's speaking with more sense and clarity than almost all other politicians. And she's directly taking on Trump now. It's pretty wild.

[Anonymous]

Why do conservatives think Democrats care if fellow Dems are investigated? Of course, investigate them and ALL the Republicans mentioned as well. Go for it. We aren't in a cult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President Trump says he will be instructing Pam Bondi, the DOJ, and the FBI to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships and involvement with Bill Clinton, Harvard President Larry Summers, & Linkedln co-founder Reid Hoffman

Hoo boy!

Investigate Bill Gates too while you’re at it

Trump playing chess, democrats checkers.

Speaking of Bubba, Trump (or should we say Monica Jr.) and the Epstein files...

Be careful what you wish for.

Who hasn't blown bubba?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple question: if there was something so damning about Trump in the files, why hasnt some mole, former FBI agent, former DOJ prosecutor or anyone else teased or leaked it? The former administration had access to these files and presumably dozens of people reviewed them, yet not one peep about anything… (and I can’t stand Trump)

Because ironically the DOJ wasn’t politicized previously. People did not leak for fear of losing their jobs. Also Trump is super litigious and always has been. Also our society really doesn’t care about sex crimes against women. Look at how people have commented on the E Jean Carroll case. Society sh*ts on women/girls who are abused because somehow they think they asked for it.

You would think Comey's daughter who set on these files for 4 years cares? Why did she sh** on women and girls by not prosecuting Trump?

I don’t know, I guess that we will find out more when the full files are released. The important part is that you found a way to blame a woman for your heroes molesting children.

Will they be released? With the 218 signatures on the discharge, the House has to vote. Then the Senate will have to vote and my understanding is it is unlikely to make it through the Senate, is that correct?

It is worse than that.

Trump would have to sign it into law.

Look at how hard he is trying to avoid being the one to squash it.

One could hope that when the votes come, the House and Senate have enough to override a veto. Now getting the AG to actually release the documents is another hurdle.

No one thinks the law will pass and take effect. The point of the discharge petition was to force a public vote on who in Congress defends sex trafficking of minors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF? "a sombrero over my head"???
This man is a U.S. Senator?

Kennedy is very bright and didn't always talk in such a way (accent and substance). It's on purpose.

And he was a Democrat 21 years ago. Maybe even more recently than that.

This is the problem with our democracy. Too much chaos and too many uninformed people misinterpreting slightly obscure comments and running with their misinterpretation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple question: if there was something so damning about Trump in the files, why hasnt some mole, former FBI agent, former DOJ prosecutor or anyone else teased or leaked it? The former administration had access to these files and presumably dozens of people reviewed them, yet not one peep about anything… (and I can’t stand Trump)

Because ironically the DOJ wasn’t politicized previously. People did not leak for fear of losing their jobs. Also Trump is super litigious and always has been. Also our society really doesn’t care about sex crimes against women. Look at how people have commented on the E Jean Carroll case. Society sh*ts on women/girls who are abused because somehow they think they asked for it.

You would think Comey's daughter who set on these files for 4 years cares? Why did she sh** on women and girls by not prosecuting Trump?

I don’t know, I guess that we will find out more when the full files are released. The important part is that you found a way to blame a woman for your heroes molesting children.

Will they be released? With the 218 signatures on the discharge, the House has to vote. Then the Senate will have to vote and my understanding is it is unlikely to make it through the Senate, is that correct?

It is worse than that.

Trump would have to sign it into law.

Look at how hard he is trying to avoid being the one to squash it.

One could hope that when the votes come, the House and Senate have enough to override a veto. Now getting the AG to actually release the documents is another hurdle.

No one thinks the law will pass and take effect. The point of the discharge petition was to force a public vote on who in Congress defends sex trafficking of minors.

Forcing Trump to veto it will be legacy-defining. Of everything he's done, this will be one of the historical standout moments given his involvement with Epstein. And it will be the ultimate betrayal of his promises to MAGA.

[Anonymous]

It would be hilarious if Trump's idea of mutually assured destruction is to take down the 20th Century Democrats along with himself and MAGA, leaving the young progressive to sweep into power with a broad coalition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Trial balloons to see what works. Republicans are focus grouping in real time.

Not one reedemable soul in the WH situation room meeting with Trump game planning a response to the release.

The sit room meets were to pressure Boebert and Mace, separately, into withdrawing their signatures on the 218 discharge petition so a vote could be averted. Those must have been horrendously high pressure meetings for these women. They bravely stood their ground. I don't agree with them on anything else, BTW.

They have earned my respect in this.

and MTG has surprised me, as well

Honestly, it seems that women - even maga women - cannot sit by and let this slide. We may have found the one thing that makes MAGA wake up from the koolaid-induced slumber!
Can’t wait to see what happens when trump and Vance are quacking around their ballroom with no power at all.

Except Megyn R. Kelly! What a dumbass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would be hilarious if Trump's idea of mutually assured destruction is to take down the 20th Century Democrats along with himself and MAGA, leaving the young progressive to sweep into power with a broad coalition.

This would be amazing