TRUMP mocks porn actress accuser: “I'm sure she's never been grabbed before.”

[Anonymous]

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-dismisses-mocks-porn-actress-accuser/

Trump, who has faced similar accusations from numerous women in recent weeks, insisted on Monday that the allegations are “made up” and “total fiction.”

“I don’t know these women, it’s not my thing to do what they say,” Trump said. “You know I don’t do that. I don’t grab them, as they say, on the arm.”

“And one said, ‘he grabbed me on the arm.’ And she’s a porn star. Now, you know, this one that…came out recently, ‘he grabbed me and he grabbed me on the arm.’ Oh, I’m sure she’s never been grabbed before,” Trump continued.

Yes she deserved it Donald, just go ahead say it like it is. What a macho man!

[Anonymous]

Then there's this - http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-trump-hosted-parties-cocaine-teen-models-report-article-1.2843615
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-trump-hosted-parties-cocaine-teen-models-report-article-1.2843615

Apparently this guy is willing to come clean -


Andy Lucchesi, a male model who used to help organize the parties, said Trump would never partake of the cocaine, but more than often indulged in his own drug of choice: sex.

Like the unnamed photographer, Lucchesi said teenage models attended the wild bashes.

[Anonymous]

She's a porn star. He has a point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

His point is porn stars aren't entitled to the same protection under the law. That is a really bad point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

Being touched as part of your job is different from being grabbed on the street. He's essentially saying she's a whore who deserves what she gets. I'm not a big fan of porn or porn stars, but like PP said, their choice of profession doesn't mean they consent to anyone touching them at any time.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

Being touched as part of your job is different from being grabbed on the street. He's essentially saying she's a whore who deserves what she gets. I'm not a big fan of porn or porn stars, but like PP said, their choice of profession doesn't mean they consent to anyone touching them at any time.

As has been repeatedly pointed out in multiple threads, Trump and his supporters struggle with the concept of "consent".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

Yes, his point is that he's an a**hole who thinks a woman's choice of occupation denies her of agency. Ask the thousands of security guards at strip joints whether the dancers they protect are fair game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

His point is porn stars aren't entitled to the same protection under the law. That is a really bad point.

Also he's implying that he really did grab her but she shouldn't complain because it probably happens to her all the time. This is like his other defense of saying that a woman isn't attractive enough for him to grab her. I mean, really? The implication is that he definitely grabs women by the crotch without permission if they're not ugly and if they're porn actresses they should be used to it and shouldn't complain.

Most people who are accused of such things would defend themselves by saying - "I would never do that." Not "I didn't do that because she's too ugly" or "I only did it because she's a porn actress."

Oh and here's something I just saw on Twitter. Apparently in expressing his condolences to Kelly Preston at the death her son, Donald Trump described how he tried really hard to pick her up at a health club. She turned him down because she was married (according to him that's the reason) and he respected that and oh by the way sorry about your son dying. Really? Who does that?!

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/trump-files-kelly-preston

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

His point is porn stars aren't entitled to the same protection under the law. That is a really bad point.

Also he's implying that he really did grab her but she shouldn't complain because it probably happens to her all the time. This is like his other defense of saying that a woman isn't attractive enough for him to grab her. I mean, really? The implication is that he definitely grabs women by the crotch without permission if they're not ugly and if they're porn actresses they should be used to it and shouldn't complain.

Most people who are accused of such things would defend themselves by saying - "I would never do that." Not "I didn't do that because she's too ugly" or "I only did it because she's a porn actress."

Oh and here's something I just saw on Twitter. Apparently in expressing his condolences to Kelly Preston at the death her son, Donald Trump described how he tried really hard to pick her up at a health club. She turned him down because she was married (according to him that's the reason) and he respected that and oh by the way sorry about your son dying. Really? Who does that?!

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/trump-files-kelly-preston

Obviously, Kelly Preston shouldn't be sad about her son, because Trump thinks she's pretty enough to hit on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

You're forgetting that one word...gee, what was it...oh yeah - CONSENT!

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

Being touched as part of your job is different from being grabbed on the street. He's essentially saying she's a whore who deserves what she gets. I'm not a big fan of porn or porn stars, but like PP said, their choice of profession doesn't mean they consent to anyone touching them at any time.

As has been repeatedly pointed out in multiple threads, Trump and his supporters struggle with the concept of "consent".

Another example tonight: Newt Gingrich accuses Megyn Kelly of being "obsessed with sex" after she covers the sexual assault allegations on her show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

Did he grope her? Or did he just offer sex for money?

Either way, I don't want him as my president. But porn stars shouldn't point fingers about people offering them sex for money. They can sure as hell say no; I just don't see how they can be offended by the offer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

Did he grope her? Or did he just offer sex for money?

Either way, I don't want him as my president. But porn stars shouldn't point fingers about people offering them sex for money. They can sure as hell say no; I just don't see how they can be offended by the offer.

Trump asked her to commit a crime. How is that not offensive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

Did he grope her? Or did he just offer sex for money?

Either way, I don't want him as my president. But porn stars shouldn't point fingers about people offering them sex for money. They can sure as hell say no; I just don't see how they can be offended by the offer.

Trump asked her to commit a crime. How is that not offensive?

Right? The other day I was driving with my DH, and he asked me to do 56 in a 55.

How could he?? I got so pissed because that would be illegal.