TRUMP mocks porn actress accuser: “I'm sure she's never been grabbed before.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

Did he grope her? Or did he just offer sex for money?

Either way, I don't want him as my president. But porn stars shouldn't point fingers about people offering them sex for money. They can sure as hell say no; I just don't see how they can be offended by the offer.

Are porn star and prostitute the same thing? Donald Trump assumed that since she is a porn star she would be okay to provide prostitute service. Not okay. It is almost like someone assumes that Melania will provide that service since she was a porn star too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

Did he grope her? Or did he just offer sex for money?

Either way, I don't want him as my president. But porn stars shouldn't point fingers about people offering them sex for money. They can sure as hell say no; I just don't see how they can be offended by the offer.

Are porn star and prostitute the same thing? Donald Trump assumed that since she is a porn star she would be okay to provide prostitute service. Not okay. It is almost like someone assumes that Melania will provide that service since she was a porn star too.

Porn stars are actresses, not prostitutes. They can be offended as anyone else can be by Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

+1000. EVERYONE is entitled to consenting (or not). Trump clearly doesn't get this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a porn star. He has a point.

No, he doesn't. Porn stars are entitled to consent

Did he grope her? Or did he just offer sex for money?

Either way, I don't want him as my president. But porn stars shouldn't point fingers about people offering them sex for money. They can sure as hell say no; I just don't see how they can be offended by the offer.

Are porn star and prostitute the same thing? Donald Trump assumed that since she is a porn star she would be okay to provide prostitute service. Not okay. It is almost like someone assumes that Melania will provide that service since she was a porn star too.

Porn stars and prostitutes are actually very close to the same thing. One is necessarily on camera. That's the main difference. Both have sex for money. That's what they do for a living. Both are entitled to say no to any offer they get. But it's silly for either to act offended by the offer.

[Anonymous]

The Daily Beast article is enlightening (author has known Trump for a long time):

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/24/inside-donald-trump-s-one-stop-parties-attendees-recall-cocaine-and-very-young-models.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Beast article is enlightening (author has known Trump for a long time):

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/24/inside-donald-trump-s-one-stop-parties-attendees-recall-cocaine-and-very-young-models.html

How can you find this to be believable and not have its truthfulness questioned? Liberals are always saying people like the Secret Service who described Hillary's awful treatment are not to be believed without proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Beast article is enlightening (author has known Trump for a long time):

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/24/inside-donald-trump-s-one-stop-parties-attendees-recall-cocaine-and-very-young-models.html

How can you find this to be believable and not have its truthfulness questioned? Liberals are always saying people like the Secret Service who described Hillary's awful treatment are not to be believed without proof.

Why do you find it not believable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Beast article is enlightening (author has known Trump for a long time):

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/24/inside-donald-trump-s-one-stop-parties-attendees-recall-cocaine-and-very-young-models.html

Existing thread about this: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/593687.page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Daily Beast article is enlightening (author has known Trump for a long time):

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/24/inside-donald-trump-s-one-stop-parties-attendees-recall-cocaine-and-very-young-models.html

How can you find this to be believable and not have its truthfulness questioned? Liberals are always saying people like the Secret Service who described Hillary's awful treatment are not to be believed without proof.

Why do you find it not believable?

It may or may not be believable. The people quoted in the article can say anything and who's to prove what they say happened actually did, or if they happened, is it greatly exaggerated? I don't know, but neither do you. Going to my SS example, many different agents said she cursed them out and treated them like crap regularly. I have a friend whose spouse worked the White House as SS during the Clinton years who says she was absolutely horrible. But others have said that's not true. While it may be believable based on the way he's been shown to have spoken, people always want proof. The Access Hollywood tape was proof. In contrast, this is not.

[Anonymous]

Ew..he also likes to grab his daughter. I can't wait till he loses and this buffoon is never heard from again.