Yeah, and you can do that without also going off on natural body urges and how normal he is for getting sexually excited by a 14 year old junior high schooler. I can smell the flop sweat stink from here. |
PP didn’t say that he/she calls it pedophilia, PP said he/she does not think it matters even a tiny bit if the general public refers to it as pedophilia. |
You can be technically correct, but also tone-deaf. This is what you are, PP. My husband who is on the spectrum can nitpick like this too, and while he's correct 100% of the time, sometimes it's well perceived, and sometimes it comes across really poorly. Just let it go already. |
Board certified psychiatrist-and you? |
|
Exactly. Nobody GAF what it's called. |
Either you’re lying or you’re without merit as I previously stated. Actual former child sex crimes prosecutor; I’ve worked with dozens of board certified psychiatrists who specialize in sexual deviancy and none of them would call this conduct pedophilia because it doesn’t meet the standards in the DSM - which if you were a psychiatrist you would well know. |
|
Searchable database of the 20,000 files.
https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/ |
|
That could be. I’m including this link again because sure the people arguing about the definition of “pedophilia” are cluttering the thread. Link to searchable database of the 20,000 files https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/ |
PP does know. PP also knows -- and states -- that it doesn't matter what the general public calls it in the colloquial sense. As for me, I'm very willing to say that hanging out on a junior high school playground and finding the 14 year old girls sexually arousing is pretty damn gross and creepy, no matter what word you use for it. The fact that you feel the need to vociferously defend this as totally normal, over and above any technical discussion of accurate terminology, is what bothers me about you. |
Christ, man. It's still illegal for you to attempt sexual intercourse with a twelve year old. |
+1 |
NO. Who the frack cares. Stop high jacking this thread with this nonsense. The general public can make a distinction between a 19 and 15 year old sexual liaison versus a 40 and 15 year old child exploitation involvement. Call it any ‘Philia you want, but the bottom line is that the 40 and 15 year old togetherness is legally, ethically, and morally wrong. Whereas the 19 and 15 year olds together are not. |
Don’t those convicted for having sex with 14 to 17 end up on predators database? |
Thank you. This thread has devolved into some silly stuff. Honestly at this point I’m less interested in Trump and Epstein (although it’s clear Trump is lying and covering up of course) but what else the emails tell us. For me one huge take away is why did anyone pay him millions for money management when he couldn’t write a coherent and grammatically correct email. |