Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.




So all this is a farce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

Every woman understands this concept. The only ones who can't understand are the men.

As if no man has ever been sexually harassed at work. GTFOH

Bull.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:





Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.




So all this is a farce.

He will not veto but Bondi will say the files cannot be released because of ongoing investigation of Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asking why George Stephanopoulos and Katie Couric aren’t canceled for dining with Epstein AFTER his guilty plea… and the silence is LOUD!!

Neither is POTUS.

And neither took part in raping young girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today Kate Manne published a Substack post about Katie Johnson’s allegations against Trump. It includes a lot of backstory on both Johnson’s allegations and other allegations of sexual assault against Trump, then a transcript of Johnson’s story as taken from a video statement. For me, the Trump background was old news but I didn’t know anything about Katie Johnson beyond “she alleged rape but withdrew her court case.”

I hated reading the details, but I feel like, for those who can stomach it, it’s part of the task of bearing witness on behalf of the victims. All the abusers, including Trump, deserve to be seen without their mask of civility and judged accordingly.

https://open.substack.com/pub/katemanne/p/the-actual-conspiracy-theory-surrounding

This case is truly disgusting -- I had no idea about this until yesterday. How did this not come out during the campaign???? She was THIRTEEN.

I may read the Substack, but I feel nauseated. WTH was the media?

Accusations are not evidence.

Yes, 13 year old girls just randomly decide to make false sexual allegations against powerful wealthy men. They’re in it for those sweet, sweet death threats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today Kate Manne published a Substack post about Katie Johnson’s allegations against Trump. It includes a lot of backstory on both Johnson’s allegations and other allegations of sexual assault against Trump, then a transcript of Johnson’s story as taken from a video statement. For me, the Trump background was old news but I didn’t know anything about Katie Johnson beyond “she alleged rape but withdrew her court case.”

I hated reading the details, but I feel like, for those who can stomach it, it’s part of the task of bearing witness on behalf of the victims. All the abusers, including Trump, deserve to be seen without their mask of civility and judged accordingly.

https://open.substack.com/pub/katemanne/p/the-actual-conspiracy-theory-surrounding

This case is truly disgusting -- I had no idea about this until yesterday. How did this not come out during the campaign???? She was THIRTEEN.

I may read the Substack, but I feel nauseated. WTH was the media?

Accusations are not evidence.

Sworn testimony is definitely evidence. What law school did you go to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

+ I think many of the younger set would be surprised about what women had to put up with in the workplace.

The younger set should watch “Mad Men” to get a little taste of what it was like for women in the workplace in the 60s and 70s.

Heck, just watch the female reporter being told “Quiet, piggy” by Trump the other day, after she brought up the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asking why George Stephanopoulos and Katie Couric aren’t canceled for dining with Epstein AFTER his guilty plea… and the silence is LOUD!!

Neither is POTUS.

Yea, instead, MAGA voted for him and continue to support him now saying "what's the big deal that these men had sex with teenagers. It used to be pretty common practice."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:





Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.




So all this is a farce.

He will not veto but Bondi will say the files cannot be released because of ongoing investigation of Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

This is what's going to happen. Massie said he feared this last night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein list could have 1 million names on it and liberals only want to see one name. ONE! PERIOD!

They could care less about the victims or what happened on that island.

Hating Trump has been their entire identity

Even if there were 1 million names on the Epstein List, only one of them is the current POTUS.

+1 But, I thought MAGA/Trump were now saying it's a Dem hoax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:





Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.




So all this is a farce.

He will not veto but Bondi will say the files cannot be released because of ongoing investigation of Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

This is what's going to happen. Massie said he feared this last night.

Which means it will still be an anvil for the GOP until they are finally released.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

+ I think many of the younger set would be surprised about what women had to put up with in the workplace.

The younger set should watch “Mad Men” to get a little taste of what it was like for women in the workplace in the 60s and 70s.

Heck, just watch the female reporter being told “Quiet, piggy” by Trump the other day, after she brought up the Epstein files.

This makes me irrationally angry. He's such a sick shell of a man.

[Anonymous]

Know who’s not in the Epstein files?

Latinos. Black people. Poor people. Immigrants. Trans people. All the “DEI” people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Know who’s not in the Epstein files?

Latinos. Black people. Poor people. Immigrants. Trans people. All the “DEI” people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today Kate Manne published a Substack post about Katie Johnson’s allegations against Trump. It includes a lot of backstory on both Johnson’s allegations and other allegations of sexual assault against Trump, then a transcript of Johnson’s story as taken from a video statement. For me, the Trump background was old news but I didn’t know anything about Katie Johnson beyond “she alleged rape but withdrew her court case.”

I hated reading the details, but I feel like, for those who can stomach it, it’s part of the task of bearing witness on behalf of the victims. All the abusers, including Trump, deserve to be seen without their mask of civility and judged accordingly.

https://open.substack.com/pub/katemanne/p/the-actual-conspiracy-theory-surrounding

This case is truly disgusting -- I had no idea about this until yesterday. How did this not come out during the campaign???? She was THIRTEEN.

I may read the Substack, but I feel nauseated. WTH was the media?

Accusations are not evidence.

Sworn testimony is definitely evidence. What law school did you go to?

This just makes me sick to my stomach. Forget about the men, but I remember when this was loosely reported about 10 years ago, women were blaming this woman and her parents. They said she was not to be believed and where were her parents. I get blaming her shitty parents, but they blamed a thirteen-year-old girl for being raped by an adult, married, man named Donald J. Trump. Why, because they wanted any excuse to vote for this man, so they did mental gymnastics that rivaled Simon Biles, to support a rapist, child rapist, sexual predator, you name it.