Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

+ I think many of the younger set would be surprised about what women had to put up with in the workplace.

The younger set should watch “Mad Men” to get a little taste of what it was like for women in the workplace in the 60s and 70s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

Every woman understands this concept. The only ones who can't understand are the men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Asking why George Stephanopoulos and Katie Couric aren’t canceled for dining with Epstein AFTER his guilty plea… and the silence is LOUD!!

Neither is POTUS.

[Anonymous]

Epstein survivors are giving a very compelling press conference at the US Capitol right now. It is being carried by all the networks, but Fox.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

Every woman understands this concept. The only ones who can't understand are the men.

As if no man has ever been sexually harassed at work. GTFOH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which foreign leaders do you think are in the files. I think that's why both Biden and this guy didn't release him.

Who's Bubba?

just read that Kash flew a government jet to see “Bubba” of the Epstein files.

Bubba is a Trump donor.

Patel used a private FBI jet to see his girlfriend…

Patel continued to use the jet after that to travel to the Boondoggle Ranch, a hunting resort in Texas owned by the family of a Republican donor, C.R. “Bubba” Saulsbury Jr., according to the Journal, and also visited Scotland in August.

—The New Republic

This seems like a plausible guess but also supports the theory that “blowing” (or whatever specific term was used, I forget) was meant in the sense of giving outsized attention to a potential donor.

If so, would Putin have "evidence" of it? Why would Epstein write afterward, "And I thought I had problems." ??

[Anonymous]

Don’t Epstein help back Hakim Jeffries?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t Epstein help back Hakim Jeffries?

He was a close associate of Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Today Kate Manne published a Substack post about Katie Johnson’s allegations against Trump. It includes a lot of backstory on both Johnson’s allegations and other allegations of sexual assault against Trump, then a transcript of Johnson’s story as taken from a video statement. For me, the Trump background was old news but I didn’t know anything about Katie Johnson beyond “she alleged rape but withdrew her court case.”

I hated reading the details, but I feel like, for those who can stomach it, it’s part of the task of bearing witness on behalf of the victims. All the abusers, including Trump, deserve to be seen without their mask of civility and judged accordingly.

https://open.substack.com/pub/katemanne/p/the-actual-conspiracy-theory-surrounding

This case is truly disgusting -- I had no idea about this until yesterday. How did this not come out during the campaign???? She was THIRTEEN.

I may read the Substack, but I feel nauseated. WTH was the media?