VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody else is still talking about this except on DCUM.

That's some major wishful thinking on your part.

They really aren’t. I live in her neighborhood and in her district. No one I know who is a Democrat is changing their vote to Republican over this. We could still lose, because it was a tight race no matter what, but Republicans have made themselves so noxious and frightening that Dems are not switching sides because this woman did something dumb. So you all can keep talking about it but the Dems in her district find this only amusing gossip. The local paper stopped talking about it. Local Reddit stopped talking about it.

I just Googled her name and Reddit. Let’s just say that she’s mentioned A LOT in posts today. You are living in a fantasy land.

The only things up on Reddit now are from days ago. The only recent news on Google are a few half hearted things from republicans on fox. I don’t care about how anyone feels about this personally. I don’t know her personally—just know some people who do. I just think it’s funny that DCUM is obsessed with this when most of you aren’t even close to her district and what you think has no bearing on the race.

She is now polling extremely well. It’s among teenage boys playing video games and watching her videos on 4chan but still…

[Anonymous]

I hope she wins because her republicans opponent has stated he is pro life and I’m 150% convinced he would vote along party lines on any abortion restrictions. I am a single issue voter on this and would hold my nose and vote for her.

I am mad at her for putting democrats in this position when she had a democratic opponent in the primary who was very similar in policies to her. She wasn’t the only option back then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope she wins because her republicans opponent has stated he is pro life and I’m 150% convinced he would vote along party lines on any abortion restrictions. I am a single issue voter on this and would hold my nose and vote for her.

I am mad at her for putting democrats in this position when she had a democratic opponent in the primary who was very similar in policies to her. She wasn’t the only option back then.

+1

All her opponent has to do is run one ad with a blurred-out screenshot and scary background music and she’s toast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody else is still talking about this except on DCUM.

That's some major wishful thinking on your part.

They really aren’t. I live in her neighborhood and in her district. No one I know who is a Democrat is changing their vote to Republican over this. We could still lose, because it was a tight race no matter what, but Republicans have made themselves so noxious and frightening that Dems are not switching sides because this woman did something dumb. So you all can keep talking about it but the Dems in her district find this only amusing gossip. The local paper stopped talking about it. Local Reddit stopped talking about it.

I just Googled her name and Reddit. Let’s just say that she’s mentioned A LOT in posts today. You are living in a fantasy land.

The only things up on Reddit now are from days ago. The only recent news on Google are a few half hearted things from republicans on fox. I don’t care about how anyone feels about this personally. I don’t know her personally—just know some people who do. I just think it’s funny that DCUM is obsessed with this when most of you aren’t even close to her district and what you think has no bearing on the race.

DP. Oh, too funny. Now tell us about the obsession on the left over Lauren Boebert and her bad behavior at a musical. And that was with clothes ON. You can certainly pretend to be nonchalant and “so above” Gibson’s gross poor judgment, but the reality is this will haunt her - and her KIDS - for the rest of their lives. Whether it affects her campaign or not remains to be seen - but if she wins in spite of her pay-for-porn hobby, that will only validate the cesspool that is the Democratic party. Good luck!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well Spanberger just scrubbed her social media to get rid of all reference to Gibson.

That can’t be so! A poster here tells us it’s just no big deal! /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody else is still talking about this except on DCUM.

That's some major wishful thinking on your part.

They really aren’t. I live in her neighborhood and in her district. No one I know who is a Democrat is changing their vote to Republican over this. We could still lose, because it was a tight race no matter what, but Republicans have made themselves so noxious and frightening that Dems are not switching sides because this woman did something dumb. So you all can keep talking about it but the Dems in her district find this only amusing gossip. The local paper stopped talking about it. Local Reddit stopped talking about it.

If you have kids, would you let them go to her house alone?

Why not? Are you afraid the kids would walk in on something? They're just as likely to walk in on something in their own house.

You can’t be serious, but sadly I know you are. This wasn’t just a married couple having sex in the privacy of their own home, and you know it. Or else you’re incredibly stupid.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody else is still talking about this except on DCUM.

That's some major wishful thinking on your part.

They really aren’t. I live in her neighborhood and in her district. No one I know who is a Democrat is changing their vote to Republican over this. We could still lose, because it was a tight race no matter what, but Republicans have made themselves so noxious and frightening that Dems are not switching sides because this woman did something dumb. So you all can keep talking about it but the Dems in her district find this only amusing gossip. The local paper stopped talking about it. Local Reddit stopped talking about it.

I just Googled her name and Reddit. Let’s just say that she’s mentioned A LOT in posts today. You are living in a fantasy land.

The only things up on Reddit now are from days ago. The only recent news on Google are a few half hearted things from republicans on fox. I don’t care about how anyone feels about this personally. I don’t know her personally—just know some people who do. I just think it’s funny that DCUM is obsessed with this when most of you aren’t even close to her district and what you think has no bearing on the race.

DP. Oh, too funny. Now tell us about the obsession on the left over Lauren Boebert and her bad behavior at a musical. And that was with clothes ON. You can certainly pretend to be nonchalant and “so above” Gibson’s gross poor judgment, but the reality is this will haunt her - and her KIDS - for the rest of their lives. Whether it affects her campaign or not remains to be seen - but if she wins in spite of her pay-for-porn hobby, that will only validate the cesspool that is the Democratic party. Good luck!

I would 1000 time rather vote for someone who isn’t FORCING me to HAVE kids. The cesspool of the Democratic party? Now that’s rich. We’re suddenly going to pretend that Republicans are for “family values?” Republicans lost the right to take any moral high ground when their dear leader con man of a candidate committed TREASON. And they still like him!

[Anonymous]

Maybe you should use birth control if not planning on having kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody else is still talking about this except on DCUM.

That's some major wishful thinking on your part.

They really aren’t. I live in her neighborhood and in her district. No one I know who is a Democrat is changing their vote to Republican over this. We could still lose, because it was a tight race no matter what, but Republicans have made themselves so noxious and frightening that Dems are not switching sides because this woman did something dumb. So you all can keep talking about it but the Dems in her district find this only amusing gossip. The local paper stopped talking about it. Local Reddit stopped talking about it.

I just Googled her name and Reddit. Let’s just say that she’s mentioned A LOT in posts today. You are living in a fantasy land.

The only things up on Reddit now are from days ago. The only recent news on Google are a few half hearted things from republicans on fox. I don’t care about how anyone feels about this personally. I don’t know her personally—just know some people who do. I just think it’s funny that DCUM is obsessed with this when most of you aren’t even close to her district and what you think has no bearing on the race.

DP. Oh, too funny. Now tell us about the obsession on the left over Lauren Boebert and her bad behavior at a musical. And that was with clothes ON. You can certainly pretend to be nonchalant and “so above” Gibson’s gross poor judgment, but the reality is this will haunt her - and her KIDS - for the rest of their lives. Whether it affects her campaign or not remains to be seen - but if she wins in spite of her pay-for-porn hobby, that will only validate the cesspool that is the Democratic party. Good luck!

I would 1000 time rather vote for someone who isn’t FORCING me to HAVE kids. The cesspool of the Democratic party? Now that’s rich. We’re suddenly going to pretend that Republicans are for “family values?” Republicans lost the right to take any moral high ground when their dear leader con man of a candidate committed TREASON. And they still like him!

Exactly. I would like to decide if/when I become a parent. How about those "parental rights"?

[Anonymous]

Can you imagine whose attending her campaign events now just to see her in the flesh (no pun intended). A bunch of guys wearing stained trench coats eating Taco Bell. Maybe she can campaign at the AVN awards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe you should use birth control if not planning on having kids?

Gosh, I should have remembered that when I was in my late second trimester and found out my baby was going to die.

Not the only person I know who this has happened to by the way. This is why the forced birthers make me want to vomit. You all want to pretend it’s just irresponsible women who deserve to “pay” for their actions when the vast majority of later abortions are performed when something goes horribly wrong in a pregnancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody else is still talking about this except on DCUM.

That's some major wishful thinking on your part.

They really aren’t. I live in her neighborhood and in her district. No one I know who is a Democrat is changing their vote to Republican over this. We could still lose, because it was a tight race no matter what, but Republicans have made themselves so noxious and frightening that Dems are not switching sides because this woman did something dumb. So you all can keep talking about it but the Dems in her district find this only amusing gossip. The local paper stopped talking about it. Local Reddit stopped talking about it.

I just Googled her name and Reddit. Let’s just say that she’s mentioned A LOT in posts today. You are living in a fantasy land.

The only things up on Reddit now are from days ago. The only recent news on Google are a few half hearted things from republicans on fox. I don’t care about how anyone feels about this personally. I don’t know her personally—just know some people who do. I just think it’s funny that DCUM is obsessed with this when most of you aren’t even close to her district and what you think has no bearing on the race.

DP. Oh, too funny. Now tell us about the obsession on the left over Lauren Boebert and her bad behavior at a musical. And that was with clothes ON. You can certainly pretend to be nonchalant and “so above” Gibson’s gross poor judgment, but the reality is this will haunt her - and her KIDS - for the rest of their lives. Whether it affects her campaign or not remains to be seen - but if she wins in spite of her pay-for-porn hobby, that will only validate the cesspool that is the Democratic party. Good luck!

I would 1000 time rather vote for someone who isn’t FORCING me to HAVE kids. The cesspool of the Democratic party? Now that’s rich. We’re suddenly going to pretend that Republicans are for “family values?” Republicans lost the right to take any moral high ground when their dear leader con man of a candidate committed TREASON. And they still like him!

The point - which you so predictably missed - is that you and your liberal cronies have your panties in a twist about Lauren Boebert behaving obnoxiously at a musical. Meanwhile, this Democrat is selling porn acts. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge that there is no comparison here is so telling.

[Anonymous]

The poll shows that core constituencies Virginia Democrats count on to turn out in elections — women, black, and young voters — signaled they may go in the opposite direction when it comes to Gibson. Women were significantly more likely than men to think she should drop out, with 60% of women saying she should quit.
Another group that Democrats bank firmly on, black voters, felt strongly that she must leave the race, with 62% saying she should drop out and only 18% saying she should stay in. And young people were not as open to the idea of a porn star as a candidate as Democrats might have hoped: 18 to 34-year-olds thought she should drop out by a 50%-40% margin, an even more negative view of the scandal than 35 to 44-year-olds.
Self-described moderates and independents also wanted her to drop out. Among the only demographic groups who said she should stay in the race were self-described liberals, 35 to 44-year-olds, and those who had not voted in any of the last four general elections.

[Anonymous]

I'm socked that she gets more support from men!

Didn't the deadline pass to replace her with another D (no pun intended)? I don't think the voters in the poll understood that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The poll shows that core constituencies Virginia Democrats count on to turn out in elections — women, black, and young voters — signaled they may go in the opposite direction when it comes to Gibson. Women were significantly more likely than men to think she should drop out, with 60% of women saying she should quit.
Another group that Democrats bank firmly on, black voters, felt strongly that she must leave the race, with 62% saying she should drop out and only 18% saying she should stay in. And young people were not as open to the idea of a porn star as a candidate as Democrats might have hoped: 18 to 34-year-olds thought she should drop out by a 50%-40% margin, an even more negative view of the scandal than 35 to 44-year-olds.
Self-described moderates and independents also wanted her to drop out. Among the only demographic groups who said she should stay in the race were self-described liberals, 35 to 44-year-olds, and those who had not voted in any of the last four general elections.

So, DCUM's core demographic. It all makes so much sense now.