Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The Archewell terms and conditions make it clear that anyone sharing a story signs over “an irrevocable, royalty free, fully paid up, in perpetuity, worldwide, assignable licence to publish, broadcast, and use, in any media now known or hereafter developed” not merely to the Sussexes’ charitable foundation, but also to their limited liability company Archewell LLC, Archewell Productions (through which the couple hold their multi-million-dollar deal with Netflix) and Archewell Audio (through which they have a similar deal with podcast giant Spotify)."

So noble and brave to profit from other's stories because of shady terms and conditions on your foundation website.

https://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1549/news

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hidden-message-prince-harry-meghan-24493053

Just despicable.

So they are asking people to give them content but they want to be the ones to profit off of the content people give them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The Archewell terms and conditions make it clear that anyone sharing a story signs over “an irrevocable, royalty free, fully paid up, in perpetuity, worldwide, assignable licence to publish, broadcast, and use, in any media now known or hereafter developed” not merely to the Sussexes’ charitable foundation, but also to their limited liability company Archewell LLC, Archewell Productions (through which the couple hold their multi-million-dollar deal with Netflix) and Archewell Audio (through which they have a similar deal with podcast giant Spotify)."

So noble and brave to profit from other's stories because of shady terms and conditions on your foundation website.

https://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1549/news

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hidden-message-prince-harry-meghan-24493053

Just despicable.

So they are asking people to give them content but they want to be the ones to profit off of the content people give them.

Essentially the Little Mermaid playing out - stealing other people's voices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

DP. But Stop being dramatic. PP wasn’t “hating” anyone- just making a comment.most of us who are critical of H and Ms motivations and actions don’t hate them. Just wish they’d stop with the hypocrisy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

DP. Harry has used wounded veterans to self-promote himself and make money for his charity. Your turn -- explain why you feel he is worth defending.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

DP. Harry has used wounded veterans to self-promote himself and make money for his charity. Your turn -- explain why you feel he is worth defending.

Are you a veteran? Is that why you’re angry and projecting? If not, yeah it’s distasteful, but it’s not uncommon in Hollywood to use others so why focus on them and not the hundreds of other narcissists there. His own family-the royals-are much more evil and toxic than this pair.

All you haters are a bunch of hypocrites which is why I’d defend them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

DP. Harry has used wounded veterans to self-promote himself and make money for his charity. Your turn -- explain why you feel he is worth defending.

Are you a veteran? Is that why you’re angry and projecting? If not, yeah it’s distasteful, but it’s not uncommon in Hollywood to use others so why focus on them and not the hundreds of other narcissists there. His own family-the royals-are much more evil and toxic than this pair.

All you haters are a bunch of hypocrites which is why I’d defend them.

You are either seriously mentally ill or are getting some sort of tangible benefit for relentlessly defending Prince Harry's exploitation of wounded veterans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 minute famous. Yawn … not like William & Kate royalty in history forever

I think she's going for the Prince Edwards/Wallis Simpson "we are scandalous" thing - no one has forgotten about them yet.

True but no one thinks highly of them either. Sad sorry lot those 2.

I actually think a slim majority thinks highly of Meghan and Harry, or at least respect the decisions they made to protects themselves and their small family. Many young people in particular, I've found, find their actions to be quite brave.

Them, brave? What a joke. Not many young veterans would agree with you on that one nor your idea of what "brave" is.

I actually asked my kids about them and they have a positive opinion of Harry and Meghan. So yes, it seems, surprise, it’s the older generation of older white women, aka Karen’s, who tend to think like this thread. Who would have thunk 😂😂😂?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 minute famous. Yawn … not like William & Kate royalty in history forever

I think she's going for the Prince Edwards/Wallis Simpson "we are scandalous" thing - no one has forgotten about them yet.

True but no one thinks highly of them either. Sad sorry lot those 2.

I actually think a slim majority thinks highly of Meghan and Harry, or at least respect the decisions they made to protects themselves and their small family. Many young people in particular, I've found, find their actions to be quite brave.

Them, brave? What a joke. Not many young veterans would agree with you on that one nor your idea of what "brave" is.

I actually asked my kids about them and they have a positive opinion of Harry and Meghan. So yes, it seems, surprise, it’s the older generation of older white women, aka Karen’s, who tend to think like this thread. Who would have thunk 😂😂😂?

It makes sense that kids like them. They are famous for doing all the things that kids are thinking about doing: They are rebelling against their family and striking out on their own, trying to learn to support themselves.

They’re just doing it all when they’re pushing 40 years old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

OP, here. I do not hate them; I'm actually kind of indifferent. I am fascinated with the psychology of those who both massage the truth (aka, are frequent liars) and those who strongly defend people caught doing this. So, why are you okay with their contradictory statements?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

DP. Harry has used wounded veterans to self-promote himself and make money for his charity. Your turn -- explain why you feel he is worth defending.

Are you a veteran? Is that why you’re angry and projecting? If not, yeah it’s distasteful, but it’s not uncommon in Hollywood to use others so why focus on them and not the hundreds of other narcissists there. His own family-the royals-are much more evil and toxic than this pair.

All you haters are a bunch of hypocrites which is why I’d defend them.

You are either seriously mentally ill or are getting some sort of tangible benefit for relentlessly defending Prince Harry's exploitation of wounded veterans.

You seem really upset. Are you from a military family or something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

OP, here. I do not hate them; I'm actually kind of indifferent. I am fascinated with the psychology of those who both massage the truth (aka, are frequent liars) and those who strongly defend people caught doing this. So, why are you okay with their contradictory statements?



And we are not fascinated with people like you who pretend to be indifferent yet constantly post updates and opinions about specific celebrities lying when every famous person lies. Something about these two bothers you (it’s racism against MM for a lot of ppl) and it’s not the lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

NP. So anyone who expresses a different opinion than yours is a “hater”? Don’t be so thin skinned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:15 minute famous. Yawn … not like William & Kate royalty in history forever

I think she's going for the Prince Edwards/Wallis Simpson "we are scandalous" thing - no one has forgotten about them yet.

True but no one thinks highly of them either. Sad sorry lot those 2.

I actually think a slim majority thinks highly of Meghan and Harry, or at least respect the decisions they made to protects themselves and their small family. Many young people in particular, I've found, find their actions to be quite brave.

Them, brave? What a joke. Not many young veterans would agree with you on that one nor your idea of what "brave" is.

I actually asked my kids about them and they have a positive opinion of Harry and Meghan. So yes, it seems, surprise, it’s the older generation of older white women, aka Karen’s, who tend to think like this thread. Who would have thunk 😂😂😂?

Who knew your kids’ opinions spoke for everyone else?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

And we are not fascinated with people like you who pretend to be indifferent yet constantly post updates and opinions about specific celebrities lying when every famous person lies. Something about these two bothers you (it’s racism against MM for a lot of ppl) and it’s not the lying.

Meh. You know nothing about me, racially or otherwise. I note that you just attacked me personally rather than provide any analysis, although you do acknowledge that H&M have made contradictory statements. Interesting.