ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I highly doubt they will allow double rostering- especially since it would involve several Aug+ kids per team. Our club fills each team with 18 kids.

I think its very likely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What would you all do... Say you have a December kid who is good enough to make MLSN1 and plays about 50% of the game. The coach very obviously prefers big kids, and the December kid is on the smaller side due to RAE.
A) Stick with that team. (BY)
B) Go to ECNL (SY)
C) Try to get them biobanded for the MLSN1 team at their SY level.
D) Play MLSN 2 (SY)

Doesn't 18 on gameday roster makes 50% game time about average for all?

The biggest kids don't come off the field. (Notice I didn't say the best.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I highly doubt they will allow double rostering- especially since it would involve several Aug+ kids per team. Our club fills each team with 18 kids.

I think its very likely.

Then they would expect a say April/May/June ish kid toward the back of a 20 plus MLS1 P2P roster to hope to get a spot to sit on the bench for an MLSN1 P2P game vs sitting on the bench of an MLSN2 game more or less half an age group up? Sounds like a crappy year for those kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I highly doubt they will allow double rostering- especially since it would involve several Aug+ kids per team. Our club fills each team with 18 kids.

I think its very likely.

Then they would expect a say April/May/June ish kid toward the back of a 20 plus MLS1 P2P roster to hope to get a spot to sit on the bench for an MLSN1 P2P game vs sitting on the bench of an MLSN2 game more or less half an age group up? Sounds like a crappy year for those kids.

These make believe scenarios on this thread has no end in sight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I highly doubt they will allow double rostering- especially since it would involve several Aug+ kids per team. Our club fills each team with 18 kids.

I think its very likely.

Then they would expect a say April/May/June ish kid toward the back of a 20 plus MLS1 P2P roster to hope to get a spot to sit on the bench for an MLSN1 P2P game vs sitting on the bench of an MLSN2 game more or less half an age group up? Sounds like a crappy year for those kids.

These make believe scenarios on this thread has no end in sight

Its the nasty negativity people and ECNL parents trying to pretend they're not 2nd tier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I highly doubt they will allow double rostering- especially since it would involve several Aug+ kids per team. Our club fills each team with 18 kids.

I think its very likely.

Then they would expect a say April/May/June ish kid toward the back of a 20 plus MLS1 P2P roster to hope to get a spot to sit on the bench for an MLSN1 P2P game vs sitting on the bench of an MLSN2 game more or less half an age group up? Sounds like a crappy year for those kids.

These make believe scenarios on this thread has no end in sight

Its the nasty negativity people and ECNL parents trying to pretend they're not 2nd tier.

And apparently desperate to get quality MLS Next kids to join and bolster their average ECNL teams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I highly doubt they will allow double rostering- especially since it would involve several Aug+ kids per team. Our club fills each team with 18 kids.

I think its very likely.

Then they would expect a say April/May/June ish kid toward the back of a 20 plus MLS1 P2P roster to hope to get a spot to sit on the bench for an MLSN1 P2P game vs sitting on the bench of an MLSN2 game more or less half an age group up? Sounds like a crappy year for those kids.

These make believe scenarios on this thread has no end in sight

MLSN admin’s announced to coaches at MLSN fest what their plan is what clubs should be doing next year. This is why they kept BY and SY.

[Anonymous]

As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

Not happening in MLSN strong Q3/4 can still play BY and if clubs feel like a player is not starter level they should be moved to SY team to offset those minutes they are losing on BY team giving players more opportunities.That was MLSN rationale for keeping both.

Parents will always and should always move kids to what’s best for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

Not happening in MLSN strong Q3/4 can still play BY and if clubs feel like a player is not starter level they should be moved to SY team to offset those minutes they are losing on BY team giving players more opportunities.That was MLSN rationale for keeping both.

Parents will always and should always move kids to what’s best for them.

Biobanding will still be in play as well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

Your kid is already playing in ECNL so it doesn't matter. You're just trying to stir the pot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

Not happening in MLSN strong Q3/4 can still play BY and if clubs feel like a player is not starter level they should be moved to SY team to offset those minutes they are losing on BY team giving players more opportunities.That was MLSN rationale for keeping both.

Parents will always and should always move kids to what’s best for them.

That's the problem. The Q3/Q4 kids that are good enough for the BY team but wouldn't get max playing time would have to go down two levels of play since they can't play for the MLSN1 team at their SY age level. Unless they bioband, I can't imagine why they would stay instead of going to ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

Not happening in MLSN strong Q3/4 can still play BY and if clubs feel like a player is not starter level they should be moved to SY team to offset those minutes they are losing on BY team giving players more opportunities.That was MLSN rationale for keeping both.

Parents will always and should always move kids to what’s best for them.

That's the problem. The Q3/Q4 kids that are good enough for the BY team but wouldn't get max playing time would have to go down two levels of play since they can't play for the MLSN1 team at their SY age level. Unless they bioband, I can't imagine why they would stay instead of going to ECNL.

But for kids who are solid Sept-Dec great opportunity to gut max playing time in both age groups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

Your kid is already playing in ECNL so it doesn't matter. You're just trying to stir the pot.

No my kids is playing MLSN AD now.

Splitting play time between 2 teams is dumb and he wont be doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL. If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on.

Not happening in MLSN strong Q3/4 can still play BY and if clubs feel like a player is not starter level they should be moved to SY team to offset those minutes they are losing on BY team giving players more opportunities.That was MLSN rationale for keeping both.

Parents will always and should always move kids to what’s best for them.

That's the problem. The Q3/Q4 kids that are good enough for the BY team but wouldn't get max playing time would have to go down two levels of play since they can't play for the MLSN1 team at their SY age level. Unless they bioband, I can't imagine why they would stay instead of going to ECNL.

They would get whatever they get plus mlsn2 playing time. Will really depend on each family to decide.