James Comey Indictment

Anonymous
This should go well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This should go well.

waste of taxpayer money
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This should go well.

waste of taxpayer money


But, more important to the King of Retribution, it will waste a lot of Comey's personal funds just trying to keep up with the federal charges, no matter how flimsy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This should go well.

waste of taxpayer money


But, more important to the King of Retribution, it will waste a lot of Comey's personal funds just trying to keep up with the federal charges, no matter how flimsy.


There are a lot of people contributing to this privately.

Comey, unlike Trump, doesn't need to hawk vaporware telephones, golden sneakers and bibles.

(Where is my phone, by the way? 100% American [but made in China])
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This should go well.

waste of taxpayer money


But, more important to the King of Retribution, it will waste a lot of Comey's personal funds just trying to keep up with the federal charges, no matter how flimsy.


There are a lot of people contributing to this privately.

Comey, unlike Trump, doesn't need to hawk vaporware telephones, golden sneakers and bibles.

(Where is my phone, by the way? 100% American [but made in China])


Didn't Comey make bank at Bridgewater?

Alas, there are a lot of others who do not have comparable assets and remain in this admin's sights - think both James and Schiff have largely, if not exclusively, worked in public service.
Anonymous
Anonymous
The new grand jury declines to indict Letitia James.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/04/politics/grand-jury-declines-to-indict-letitia-james-again
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The new grand jury declines to indict Letitia James.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/04/politics/grand-jury-declines-to-indict-letitia-james-again


Well, that certainly says a lot since the common conception is that grand juries will indict a “ham sandwich.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The new grand jury declines to indict Letitia James.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/04/politics/grand-jury-declines-to-indict-letitia-james-again


Well, that certainly says a lot since the common conception is that grand juries will indict a “ham sandwich.”

Yep
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Everything from Trump world, every call, text message, email, calendar entry, and half-formed thought, was seized and put under a microscope for years. They even raided his home and rifled through the underwear drawer. Of course they never found anything. But now that the shoe is on the other foot, and there is highly incriminating evidence against the people who instigated the hoaxes, it somehow cannot be used. Just beyond infuriating.



All of what you cite as being an affront was done pursuant to a valid warrant, subpoena or other genuine legal process.

The only thing the judge has done is say "DOJ you must use a warrant, subpoena or other genuine legal process in order to use this."

We know you guys think of the constitution as a mere technicality, but it really isn't. It's important.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


::fist shaking::

And I would have gotten away with it, if it wasn’t for that pesky Fourth Amendment!!

GMAFB.
Anonymous
Damn. I quoted the wrong article. Oh, well.
Anonymous
Another lawless order by another Democrat activist judge.

After these shameful DC judges persecuted Trump supporters for years after January 6th, they suddenly pretend to care about rights—to protect political allies.

The DC district court is a national disgrace.

Defund it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Another lawless order by another Democrat activist judge.

After these shameful DC judges persecuted Trump supporters for years after January 6th, they suddenly pretend to care about rights—to protect political allies.

The DC district court is a national disgrace.

Defund it.


Is this MAGA parody? It's hard to tell sometimes.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: