Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, to sum up: "I was not treated the same as Kate and my child was not treated the same as hers, in a hierarchical system. The only possible reason is racism"

Sadly you can’t discount that racism is a huge part of the firm’s behavior.

Yes, but that doesn’t mean everything Meghan says is automatically true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, to sum up: "I was not treated the same as Kate and my child was not treated the same as hers, in a hierarchical system. The only possible reason is racism"

I feel like you’re oversimplifying this to prove that it wasn’t racism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, to sum up: "I was not treated the same as Kate and my child was not treated the same as hers, in a hierarchical system. The only possible reason is racism"

Sadly you can’t discount that racism is a huge part of the firm’s behavior.

Or maybe they simply don’t care for conniving manipulators, be they black, white or purple.

[Anonymous]

Harry is going to deeply, deeply regret that this interview ever took place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, to sum up: "I was not treated the same as Kate and my child was not treated the same as hers, in a hierarchical system. The only possible reason is racism"

I feel like you’re oversimplifying this to prove that it wasn’t racism.

Again — was there a lot of racism? Yes.

Does that make Meghan an angel who can only ever speak and act the truth? No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hate this interview so far, but I cried when they talked about Archie's skin color. And I have no doubt that this was William.

No way. Phillip, yes.

There have been hints that Philip is experiencing dementia, so I sincerely doubt that it was he having serious, racist conversations with Harry.

If he has dementia, then he very well havr lost his filter and I eould not be surprised if he had some racist outbursts here and there.

[Anonymous]

I hate how she always says "right?" Like, "You agree with me YES?!?!"

[Anonymous]

A baby Diana...shocker.

Odds of gender selection?

[Anonymous]

I really do not think Harry and Meghan will last.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to deeply, deeply regret that this interview ever took place.

yes, when he is running back to the UK with his tail between his legs!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t want to give her newborn SECURITY. I told you she was afraid for her child’s life. And that is why he has never been back to that island.

Do the other kids have security?

Yes. George, Charlotte and Louis all have personal security to themselves and while in school away from William and Kate.

This gets into the money stuff, which can be a huge conversational tangent.

But I’m presuming she could pay for a little more security. When Harry and Meghan needed to be away from Archie.

And what about security of their property. If they needed to leave him with a nanny while out. There is just *no one* securing the premises?

Oh, c’mon! They were on the Queen’s property! There is tons of security - they do not allow people to meander about.

That’s what I’m saying. For at least 3-4 years he would be home or out with his parents. And sometimes home while they go out.
They could have relied on some type of security I’m sure. Paid for it when needed. And then maybe convince Charles when he goes to school to help pay.

I don’t believe that Archie was going to be unsecured just because he didn’t have his own security as an infant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, to sum up: "I was not treated the same as Kate and my child was not treated the same as hers, in a hierarchical system. The only possible reason is racism"

I feel like you’re oversimplifying this to prove that it wasn’t racism.

Again — was there a lot of racism? Yes.

Does that make Meghan an angel who can only ever speak and act the truth? No.

Would she have been treated differently had she been the daughter of, say, a rich White European or American billionaire?
Yes.
I rest my case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, to sum up: "I was not treated the same as Kate and my child was not treated the same as hers, in a hierarchical system. The only possible reason is racism"

I feel like you’re oversimplifying this to prove that it wasn’t racism.

Again — was there a lot of racism? Yes.

Does that make Meghan an angel who can only ever speak and act the truth? No.

Are the PP who is trying to do the “of course Meghan only thinks it’s all racism.” I don’t think Meghan expected to walk in front of the queen, or even to be treated at the level of Kate, but I think that the Palace - at least Kensington Palace - was hanging them out to dry in a way that they didn’t need to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was truly, truly, TRULY suicidal and TRULY about being pro-mental health, she would have added how she continued to sought mental health upon leaving the UK.

Nice catch!

But no. Meghan was magically fine once she landed in Canada.

What are you not getting? The mental health problems were caused by the situation she was in.

She's an actress. She was probably mentally unstable before. Most of them are. Why do you think they spend their lives pretending to be other people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to deeply, deeply regret that this interview ever took place.

yes, when he is running back to the UK with his tail between his legs!

Running back to what? Be the permanent third wheel to his brother and his wife.