Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was able to go to the courtroom yesterday, socked only a handful of people where there.

How did you do it? Just showed up? What time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heads up, The judge dismissed court until Tuesday, Jan. 20.

The court doesn't hear trials on Fridays, those are reserved for motions.

Would we see any motions?

[Anonymous]

Jury Demographics – Brendan Banfield Murder Trial

Total Jurors: 16 (including alternates)
Gender: 9 men, 7 women
Race/Ethnicity:
Black: 1 male, 1 female
Asian: 2 males
Hispanic: 1 female
Middle Eastern or Hispanic: 1 female
Unidentified: 1 male, 1 older male
White: 8ish

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

Just because your life is vanilla, doesn’t mean others are too 🤷🏻‍♀️
As far as I know, he’s not accused of anything. He’s a victim. If he was terrifying, he’d be out actually r4p… people

There a lot of real estate between vanilla bean and the twisted Baskin Robbin’s 31 ways to “pretend” violently rape and violate a woman in the most painful and degrading way possible (in the telegram not gonna post here)). He’s a victim for sure but not a nice one and a bit of a victim of his own making.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was able to go to the courtroom yesterday, socked only a handful of people where there.

How did you do it? Just showed up? What time?

Yes, I just showed after 2pm ish. room 5F.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

Just because your life is vanilla, doesn’t mean others are too 🤷🏻‍♀️
As far as I know, he’s not accused of anything. He’s a victim. If he was terrifying, he’d be out actually r4p… people

There a lot of real estate between vanilla bean and the twisted Baskin Robbin’s 31 ways to “pretend” violently rape and violate a woman in the most painful and degrading way possible (in the telegram not gonna post here)). He’s a victim for sure but not a nice one and a bit of a victim of his own making.

I'm with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was able to go to the courtroom yesterday, socked only a handful of people where there.

How did you do it? Just showed up? What time?

Yes, I just showed after 2pm ish. room 5F.

It's 5J, but I agree you can just show up. It's not like the Depp trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heads up, The judge dismissed court until Tuesday, Jan. 20.

The court doesn't hear trials on Fridays, those are reserved for motions.

Would we see any motions?

Not for this trial, I was just saying that no trials are held on Fridays. So next week expect the last day to be Thursday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was able to go to the courtroom yesterday, socked only a handful of people where there.

How did you do it? Just showed up? What time?

Yes, I just showed after 2pm ish. room 5F.

It's 5J, but I agree you can just show up. It's not like the Depp trial.

Yep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

Just because your life is vanilla, doesn’t mean others are too 🤷🏻‍♀️
As far as I know, he’s not accused of anything. He’s a victim. If he was terrifying, he’d be out actually r4p… people

There a lot of real estate between vanilla bean and the twisted Baskin Robbin’s 31 ways to “pretend” violently rape and violate a woman in the most painful and degrading way possible (in the telegram not gonna post here)). He’s a victim for sure but not a nice one and a bit of a victim of his own making.

sorry if you dont get consensual role-play. He asked her several times about her boundaries. I read the texts. He wanted to make her feel comfortable. She asked to do a fake rape role-play. She asked him to do a little blood play. He admits it's not his thing, but that he had done it once for an actual girlfriend and that he was careful about it. She asked to play out SA. This doesnt make him a bad person at all... it is ROLE PlAY and his friends and family would differ from what you have said. Just because you don't choose to do this sort of thing doesn't mean other people don't have a right to create fantasy play. He was an actual nice guy who even told her he liked gods... for crying out loud stop victim blaming for a guy that was brutally murdered!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

Just because your life is vanilla, doesn’t mean others are too 🤷🏻‍♀️
As far as I know, he’s not accused of anything. He’s a victim. If he was terrifying, he’d be out actually r4p… people

There a lot of real estate between vanilla bean and the twisted Baskin Robbin’s 31 ways to “pretend” violently rape and violate a woman in the most painful and degrading way possible (in the telegram not gonna post here)). He’s a victim for sure but not a nice one and a bit of a victim of his own making.

sorry if you dont get consensual role-play. He asked her several times about her boundaries. I read the texts. He wanted to make her feel comfortable. She asked to do a fake rape role-play. She asked him to do a little blood play. He admits it's not his thing, but that he had done it once for an actual girlfriend and that he was careful about it. She asked to play out SA. This doesnt make him a bad person at all... it is ROLE PlAY and his friends and family would differ from what you have said. Just because you don't choose to do this sort of thing doesn't mean other people don't have a right to create fantasy play. He was an actual nice guy who even told her he liked gods... for crying out loud stop victim blaming for a guy that was brutally murdered!!!!!

I meant dogs and not gods. lol

[Anonymous]

In the telegram (won’t post here) there was a 45 min phone call. They can’t say that BB did that. It must have been a woman aka J right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the telegram (won’t post here) there was a 45 min phone call. They can’t say that BB did that. It must have been a woman aka J right?

Yes. She said she did.

[Anonymous]

https://wjla.com/news/local/fairfax-county-au-pair-magalhaes-banfield-brendan-babysitters-former-employer-carrigan-kent-police-co-conspirator-double-murder-virginia-trial

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

Just because your life is vanilla, doesn’t mean others are too 🤷🏻‍♀️
As far as I know, he’s not accused of anything. He’s a victim. If he was terrifying, he’d be out actually r4p… people

There a lot of real estate between vanilla bean and the twisted Baskin Robbin’s 31 ways to “pretend” violently rape and violate a woman in the most painful and degrading way possible (in the telegram not gonna post here)). He’s a victim for sure but not a nice one and a bit of a victim of his own making.

I read the transcript and was horrified by it, but that man (Joe) was FULLY committed to consent. He, multiple times, verified things like safe words (I think they talked about snapping fingers?) and he verbally expressed concern that if he restrained her in a certain way she wouldnt be able to snap if she wanted him to stop. He even verified the exact time that he would stop restraining her and that he would set an alarm. And there were other instances of him being very proactive in making sure there was consent, and that he knew exactly what she wanted, what she didn't want, and how she could signal for him to stop. No one is going to ever accuse me of being remotely in to any of this stuff that I read in the transcript, but you absolutely cannot place the blame on Joe for this and say that he "isn't nice" based on reading this. If anything, he came across as incredibly sensitive to making sure she was comfortable with the whole plan. So GTFO with calling him "not a nice victim and a victim of his own making". That's completely unfair.