Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What the heck happened to Oprah's eyebrows?? They look drawn on with marker!

You must not be in menopause yet? Newsflash: lots of women lose their brows and hair on head starts thinning, too. Enjoy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No security and no princely title for the black baby.

Meghan and Harry made the no title decision. He would have been granted one by the Queen.

Meghan did not percieve it that way and she's clearly put out.

[Anonymous]

If she was truly, truly, TRULY suicidal and TRULY about being pro-mental health, she would have added how she continued to sought mental health upon leaving the UK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oprah seems a bit unsure about Megan’s “truths”

Lol, no. You’re a dipsh*t

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hate this interview so far, but I cried when they talked about Archie's skin color. And I have no doubt that this was William.

No way. Phillip, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what are the Sussexes hoping will happen? That the Queen disbands the monarchy by sunrise?

Of course not. They just want to live their life in the United States in freedom. If the palace came out with a apology great? Better - stop putting out poisonous bile about these two people.

Apologize for what? Someone’s delusions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan went to a ‘senior person’ to get help and ask for mental health resources. She sent emails - they did nothing.

I think the ‘senior person’ is Charles.

This I don’t get. Hire a psychiatrist like anyone else who has the money.

Someone else controls their every move: transportation, finances, caregivers. they probably listen in on their phone calls. You can't imagine it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what are the Sussexes hoping will happen? That the Queen disbands the monarchy by sunrise?

They seem to want the media to say only nice things about them and mean things about the others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No security and no princely title for the black baby.

Meghan and Harry made the no title decision. He would have been granted one by the Queen.

Meghan did not percieve it that way and she's clearly put out.

This woman lives to find fault in everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No security and no princely title for the black baby.

Meghan and Harry made the no title decision. He would have been granted one by the Queen.

She’s wrong about the protocol. Archie would not have usually gotten the title of Prince because his Grandfather is not the Monarch. Ann’s kids have no titles at all. The Queen could do it as a courtesy, I think. The story at the time was that it was their decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan just seems put out that she was lower in the pecking order than the Cambridges.

She comes across as a delusional narcissist. I am seriously wondering if prenatal/postpartum depression and anxiety is playing a role in all of this. She needs to zip it during these times. She will regret doing this I am afraid.

She protected her son. She didn’t want him to grow up in a racist family who would always look down him : no title, no security, limited opportunities.
I don’t think she will have any regrets at all.

Limited opportunities: The kid can obtain the best private education imaginable and will lack for nothing.

The Princess Royal did not take titles for her kids and they ate more related to the Queen than her kid.

She was the Princess Royal. She probably could afford to not take any titles.
Meghan Markle’s son has more to prove in the eyes of the British ... they don’t call her the interloper for nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t want to give her newborn SECURITY. I told you she was afraid for her child’s life. And that is why he has never been back to that island.

Do the other kids have security?

Yes. George, Charlotte and Louis all have personal security to themselves and while in school away from William and Kate.

This gets into the money stuff, which can be a huge conversational tangent.

But I’m presuming she could pay for a little more security. When Harry and Meghan needed to be away from Archie.

And what about security of their property. If they needed to leave him with a nanny while out. There is just *no one* securing the premises?

Oh, c’mon! They were on the Queen’s property! There is tons of security - they do not allow people to meander about.

[Anonymous]

She is scum. Who talks about family like that.

[Anonymous]

No words. Shes killing it.

Team Meghan!!!!! USA!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t want to give her newborn SECURITY. I told you she was afraid for her child’s life. And that is why he has never been back to that island.

Do the other kids have security?

Yes. George, Charlotte and Louis all have personal security to themselves and while in school away from William and Kate.

George is 3rd in line for the thrown. Charlotte is 4th, Louis is fifth. I don’t even know what Archie is but it’s waayyyy further down than that. Charles said decades ago that he wants to streamline the royals to main members so this doesn’t seem personal to me- I think Meghan is spinning things.

Now this stuff abo ur how dark Archie will be? Absolutely disgusting and racist. No defense there.

Agree about the slim lining of the monarchy. I think Meaghan viewed it differently. As for the “senior royal,” thank God she did not name him, but you do know Phillip is 99. Of course he’s racist.

It’s not Phillip. Let’s be real, he wouldn’t even interfere in the Diana saga. There’s no way he cares more about the Meghan one. However Charles? He undermined his wife every second of every day and let the press go after her like sharks. And don’t tell me he didn’t - look how he protects the homewrecker.