Hilaria Baldwin - At it again

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Today being a mother is weaponized by some to virtue signal sanctimony and impunity from scrutiny. Hilary is a blatant example of that maternal-weaponization.

What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.

100%. So many of her social media posts there are photos like this. It always seems deliberately needs to seek attention and validation by using body, sexuality, fetishizing, etc. No regard for others around her, no sense of boundaries for her kids, no concept that women might not be interested in her constant photos of herself breastfeeding and her nudity/body with her kids, no respect for their privacy, entitlement that anyone seeing it as strange or wrong means they're "shaming" her. It's like no really, this and you are bizarro.

It's hard to believe a celebrity would be comfortable with it regarding his kids or wife, but Alec seems fine with it.

[Anonymous]

Testing 1-2-3. McNasty here wondering where all my posts went from the last two days.

[Anonymous]

I just figured out...she did not pretend to be Latina. She pretended to be a White Spanish person from Spain!!

Ok. I thought that she was pretending to be Latina and non-White. And I could not figure out why someone who belongs to the most privildged race in USA would want to downgrade into a not-priviledged minority. I could not even understand the anger of all the White women who were posting against her.

This turned out into just another White chick drama. Cat fight! Cat fight!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I just figured out...she did not pretend to be Latina. She pretended to be a White Spanish person from Spain!!

Ok. I thought that she was pretending to be Latina and non-White. And I could not figure out why someone who belongs to the most privildged race in USA would want to downgrade into a not-priviledged minority. I could not even understand the anger of all the White women who were posting against her.

This turned out into just another White chick drama. Cat fight! Cat fight!

It's never cool to be or sound like a racist, even if it is "white people" you are being racist about.

[Anonymous]

Her need for attention is unstoppable and has no boundaries. Her children and husband fall below her getting attention. Well Hilary, has world wide attention now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.


Worst of all is that the children are not of the age of consent to realize that they are participating in having their images, faces and stories about their identities permanently splashed (in videos no less) all over the internet permanently.. The babies will one day grow up and realize they were shilled for likes, views and subs. Maybe they won't care because they too will have inherited enormous wealth and celebrity but even so, it is short-sighted to think that just because they are YOUR children, that they can be publicized in that way. Makes me have all the more respect for celebrities who protect their children's privacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.

Worst of all is that the children are not of the age of consent to realize that they are participating in having their images, faces and stories about their identities permanently splashed (in videos no less) all over the internet permanently.. The babies will one day grow up and realize they were shilled for likes, views and subs. Maybe they won't care because they too will have inherited enormous wealth and celebrity but even so, it is short-sighted to think that just because they are YOUR children, that they can be publicized in that way. Makes me have all the more respect for celebrities who protect their children's privacy.

[Anonymous]

We are all aware the internet is a permanent record. Her young children will see photos with her feet behind her head and all of her obscured yoga poses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today being a mother is weaponized by some to virtue signal sanctimony and impunity from scrutiny. Hilary is a blatant example of that maternal-weaponization.

What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.

100%. So many of her social media posts there are photos like this. It always seems deliberately needs to seek attention and validation by using body, sexuality, fetishizing, etc. No regard for others around her, no sense of boundaries for her kids, no concept that women might not be interested in her constant photos of herself breastfeeding and her nudity/body with her kids, no respect for their privacy, entitlement that anyone seeing it as strange or wrong means they're "shaming" her. It's like no really, this and you are bizarro.

It's hard to believe a celebrity would be comfortable with it regarding his kids or wife, but Alec seems fine with it.

Yes, yes, yes, Thank you for this. It articulates so clearly what makes her so grating and disingenuous. Her IG is not really about health, family, body acceptance, well-being etc... It is like that saying goes... watch what people do, not what they say. Despite the wording in her messages, if you just LOOK at the images and videos they reek of sexualization of her body.

I grew up dancing (ballet, jazz, contemporary etc..), and then worked with yogis at studios for a decade, I have never seen an instructor or colleague demonstrate moves or sequences with this degree of sexuality. These exercises are not inherently sexual. She sexualizes them. The sexualization is a reflection of her personality. Even this is so not a big deal. If someone wants to be sexual and expressive go for it! What is so annoying is her fierce denial and gaslighting of anyone who comments on this or questions her behavior. Denying the truth and claiming it is all for motherhood, wellness or body acceptance. COME ON! It's a farce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We are all aware the internet is a permanent record. Her young children will see photos with her feet behind her head and all of her obscured yoga poses.

The comments from complete strangers on AB's social media posts saying they miss seeing his kids would scare me as a parent personally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today being a mother is weaponized by some to virtue signal sanctimony and impunity from scrutiny. Hilary is a blatant example of that maternal-weaponization.

What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.

100%. So many of her social media posts there are photos like this. It always seems deliberately needs to seek attention and validation by using body, sexuality, fetishizing, etc. No regard for others around her, no sense of boundaries for her kids, no concept that women might not be interested in her constant photos of herself breastfeeding and her nudity/body with her kids, no respect for their privacy, entitlement that anyone seeing it as strange or wrong means they're "shaming" her. It's like no really, this and you are bizarro.

It's hard to believe a celebrity would be comfortable with it regarding his kids or wife, but Alec seems fine with it.

Yes, yes, yes, Thank you for this. It articulates so clearly what makes her so grating and disingenuous. Her IG is not really about health, family, body acceptance, well-being etc... It is like that saying goes... watch what people do, not what they say. Despite the wording in her messages, if you just LOOK at the images and videos they reek of sexualization of her body.

I grew up dancing (ballet, jazz, contemporary etc..), and then worked with yogis at studios for a decade, I have never seen an instructor or colleague demonstrate moves or sequences with this degree of sexuality. These exercises are not inherently sexual. She sexualizes them. The sexualization is a reflection of her personality. Even this is so not a big deal. If someone wants to be sexual and expressive go for it! What is so annoying is her fierce denial and gaslighting of anyone who comments on this or questions her behavior. Denying the truth and claiming it is all for motherhood, wellness or body acceptance. COME ON! It's a farce.

[Anonymous]

THIS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today being a mother is weaponized by some to virtue signal sanctimony and impunity from scrutiny. Hilary is a blatant example of that maternal-weaponization.

What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.

100%. So many of her social media posts there are photos like this. It always seems deliberately needs to seek attention and validation by using body, sexuality, fetishizing, etc. No regard for others around her, no sense of boundaries for her kids, no concept that women might not be interested in her constant photos of herself breastfeeding and her nudity/body with her kids, no respect for their privacy, entitlement that anyone seeing it as strange or wrong means they're "shaming" her. It's like no really, this and you are bizarro.

It's hard to believe a celebrity would be comfortable with it regarding his kids or wife, but Alec seems fine with it.

Yes, yes, yes, Thank you for this. It articulates so clearly what makes her so grating and disingenuous. Her IG is not really about health, family, body acceptance, well-being etc... It is like that saying goes... watch what people do, not what they say. Despite the wording in her messages, if you just LOOK at the images and videos they reek of sexualization of her body.

I grew up dancing (ballet, jazz, contemporary etc..), and then worked with yogis at studios for a decade, I have never seen an instructor or colleague demonstrate moves or sequences with this degree of sexuality. These exercises are not inherently sexual. She sexualizes them. The sexualization is a reflection of her personality. Even this is so not a big deal. If someone wants to be sexual and expressive go for it! What is so annoying is her fierce denial and gaslighting of anyone who comments on this or questions her behavior. Denying the truth and claiming it is all for motherhood, wellness or body acceptance. COME ON! It's a farce.

Yes! This pic, what in the world? It's so obviously for titillation. Most of her so called "yoga pose" pics are imo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today being a mother is weaponized by some to virtue signal sanctimony and impunity from scrutiny. Hilary is a blatant example of that maternal-weaponization.

What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.

100%. So many of her social media posts there are photos like this. It always seems deliberately needs to seek attention and validation by using body, sexuality, fetishizing, etc. No regard for others around her, no sense of boundaries for her kids, no concept that women might not be interested in her constant photos of herself breastfeeding and her nudity/body with her kids, no respect for their privacy, entitlement that anyone seeing it as strange or wrong means they're "shaming" her. It's like no really, this and you are bizarro.

It's hard to believe a celebrity would be comfortable with it regarding his kids or wife, but Alec seems fine with it.

Yes, yes, yes, Thank you for this. It articulates so clearly what makes her so grating and disingenuous. Her IG is not really about health, family, body acceptance, well-being etc... It is like that saying goes... watch what people do, not what they say. Despite the wording in her messages, if you just LOOK at the images and videos they reek of sexualization of her body.

I grew up dancing (ballet, jazz, contemporary etc..), and then worked with yogis at studios for a decade, I have never seen an instructor or colleague demonstrate moves or sequences with this degree of sexuality. These exercises are not inherently sexual. She sexualizes them. The sexualization is a reflection of her personality. Even this is so not a big deal. If someone wants to be sexual and expressive go for it! What is so annoying is her fierce denial and gaslighting of anyone who comments on this or questions her behavior. Denying the truth and claiming it is all for motherhood, wellness or body acceptance. COME ON! It's a farce.

The strangest part is that she thinks this photo looks good or she wouldn't have posted it. The lighting is terrible, the pattern on the tights is not sexy, her hair doesn't look attractive, and her facial expression looks a little looney not hot. It's like she's starting in a bad low budget movie based at a motel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today being a mother is weaponized by some to virtue signal sanctimony and impunity from scrutiny. Hilary is a blatant example of that maternal-weaponization.

What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.

100%. So many of her social media posts there are photos like this. It always seems deliberately needs to seek attention and validation by using body, sexuality, fetishizing, etc. No regard for others around her, no sense of boundaries for her kids, no concept that women might not be interested in her constant photos of herself breastfeeding and her nudity/body with her kids, no respect for their privacy, entitlement that anyone seeing it as strange or wrong means they're "shaming" her. It's like no really, this and you are bizarro.

It's hard to believe a celebrity would be comfortable with it regarding his kids or wife, but Alec seems fine with it.

Yes, yes, yes, Thank you for this. It articulates so clearly what makes her so grating and disingenuous. Her IG is not really about health, family, body acceptance, well-being etc... It is like that saying goes... watch what people do, not what they say. Despite the wording in her messages, if you just LOOK at the images and videos they reek of sexualization of her body.

I grew up dancing (ballet, jazz, contemporary etc..), and then worked with yogis at studios for a decade, I have never seen an instructor or colleague demonstrate moves or sequences with this degree of sexuality. These exercises are not inherently sexual. She sexualizes them. The sexualization is a reflection of her personality. Even this is so not a big deal. If someone wants to be sexual and expressive go for it! What is so annoying is her fierce denial and gaslighting of anyone who comments on this or questions her behavior. Denying the truth and claiming it is all for motherhood, wellness or body acceptance. COME ON! It's a farce.

The strangest part is that she thinks this photo looks good or she wouldn't have posted it. The lighting is terrible, the pattern on the tights is not sexy, her hair doesn't look attractive, and her facial expression looks a little looney not hot. It's like she's starting in a bad low budget movie based at a motel.

Not only did she post it, it was in LATINA magazine. http://www.latina.com/celebrity/hilaria-baldwin-sexy-yoga-selfie[/url]

Alec Baldwin is one lucky man!

His Spanish wife, Hilaria Baldwin, regularly posts Instagram shots performing complicated yoga poses with the hashtag #yogapostureoftheday.

On Wednesday, the flexible yoga instructor took it to a whole new level, posting an absurdly sexy bedroom selfie.

She shared a shot of herself wearing sky-high heels, black lingerie, and fishnet tights with one leg perched behind her head and the other up in the air. She said it was "inspired by Dita Von Teese", a burlesque dancer and singer.