Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Hilaria Baldwin - At it again
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
This is a silly thing to "cancel" someone over. I'm not saying it's entirely harmless, but it's more weird than offensive. It makes everything out of her mouth seem inauthentic. Not a great spot to be in if you're trying to be authentic aspirational mom of five...You can understand why advertisers see her as risky. I'm finding it hard to believe the Baldwins have Glade Scented Candles in their home. Yeah especially because she's seemed to play up the importance of clean, organic, etc. to her in other content. The video where she shills for Glade appears to invite the viewer into the Baldwin's living room, where she has Glade candles burning while she relaxes on her yoga mat. Glade candles are made of paraffin and synthetic fragrances, both of which release toxic compounds in the air when burned. Understood. But its important to note that she's a liar and we cannot take her pretense of avoiding all things toxic seriously. The woman has D cup silicone breast implants, cheek implants, toxic botox in her face, tattooed eye brows (Hepatitis can be transmitted from tattoos) and has undergone general anesthesia that carries risks for liposuction (if you look carefully she has a tale-tale circular scar on each thigh) and eyelid surgeries at the minimum. She has unnatural fillers in her face and lips. I could go on but my point is that she puts toxic materials and chemicals INSIDE her body all the time. |
Anonymous
This is a silly thing to "cancel" someone over. I'm not saying it's entirely harmless, but it's more weird than offensive. It makes everything out of her mouth seem inauthentic. Not a great spot to be in if you're trying to be authentic aspirational mom of five...You can understand why advertisers see her as risky. I'm finding it hard to believe the Baldwins have Glade Scented Candles in their home. Yeah especially because she's seemed to play up the importance of clean, organic, etc. to her in other content. The video where she shills for Glade appears to invite the viewer into the Baldwin's living room, where she has Glade candles burning while she relaxes on her yoga mat. Glade candles are made of paraffin and synthetic fragrances, both of which release toxic compounds in the air when burned. The woman dyes her hair while pregnant. A little toxic candle is not a problem for her. She does not live the toxin-free lifestyle she's selling. She's a fraud. |
Anonymous
|
On the topic of candles, if most candles give you headaches, try soy candles. A little more expensive but no headaches.
On topic, Alec has posted on Twitter: “The lockdown has taught me that we need less in our lives. Less clothes, less talk, less food, less media. Above all, less people.” Via Daily Mail. |
Anonymous
| Alec keeps tweeting. So there's that. |
Anonymous
|
2 companies have parted ways w Hillary. Why should other companies also not separate from someone who got their endorsements and cash under false pretenses?
In 2017, Hillary also got again under false pretenses, the “well-being” award from the Wellness Foundation located near NYC. Why dies that award not be returned? Since the cash from endorsement companies also gotten under false pretenses why sd it also not be returned? Dear McNasty, my comments here also have been deleted, soon as I mention the 2017 well-being award and its return. Also I have been blocked from even entering the forum at all. Not sure why today that allow it, blocked me b f for 5 days. |
Anonymous
Yes, this! I noticed that every time something was posted about some 2017 wellness award it would then be gone if I checked back or day or two later. So weird! It’s like this award means more than just what it looks like. It doesn’t even seem important to an outside consumer like me. What’s so important about it that someone is going out of their way to delete? Thoughts? Also, there seems to be a whole of of blocking, suspending, editing of accounts and content around social media accounts and the internet as it relates to H. So weird. H and A seem obsessive about manipulating people’s perceptions of H (or maybe the both of them). It seems like they might be the type of couple to hire private investigators and pay absurd amounts of cash to figure out peoples IP addresses and identities and block them and stuff. Looney tunes! |
Anonymous
I think there is some pressure when you marry someone wealthy to try and make your own money so you don't seem like a gold digger. My professional athlete ex used to sing that song "You've got to have a j-o-b" to me. Fortunately that relationship didn't last long. Such insecure w@nkers they are, celebrities. |
Anonymous
I don't think Hillary/Hilaria has a "net worth" to combine with Alec, which is fine. Being a stay at home mom versus having a career is okay too. Doubt that Alec is pushing her to earn money. HB seems to be someone who likes to pretend she's all the popular things, and being a "working mom" like a lot of bloggers/influencers is one of those token trends a lot of them use to get attention. |
Anonymous
| #undoing is spot on. Poor Alec. He was duped. |
Anonymous
So you think he never met the parents before they married and wondered why they had a perfect American accent? You think he had nothing to do with leaving the parents out of the NYTimes announcement? My guess is he was duped for a couple months and then he decided he liked the accent and game of pretend and he asked her to keep it up. He may not have known she intended to try to have her own fame and it all snowballed. |
Anonymous
Highly doubt he "liked the accent game." Wasn't it only the mom who Hilary said was Spanish, and her dad was from Boston? That would explain how he didn't have a Spanish accent. She probably lied or had an excuse with Alec about it. He may have said keep it up to try to avoid issues about it. But, then again, Alec doesn't seem like a very good person. Maybe he knew all along and was fine with it. |
Anonymous
|
Today being a mother is weaponized by some to virtue signal sanctimony and impunity from scrutiny. Hilary is a blatant example of that maternal-weaponization.
What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt. |
Anonymous
 HER NAME IS NOT HILARIA
We need to use her real name when referring to her. It's Hilary Heyward Thomas. |
Anonymous
|
What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt.
Can not agree more. This women has five children under 8 years old and she parades around like an adult film star. This has nothing to do with obtaining money, she wants to be seen. It must be killing her to be off Social Meida. She probably can not function. |
Anonymous
|
What Hilary has done to bypass scrutiny about her using her social media posts as a thinly veiled version of OnlyFans, littered with lingerie workouts, crotch-centered-legs-spread close ups, breasts spilling out of black lace see through bras, cleavage everywhere and butt popped out in leather leggings, posing in underwear or with it not even visible so as to appear to not be wearing anything, and in some pictures, in thongs...is that she USES her babies as props to counterbalance the in-your-face sexuality. She flashes her breasts, butt and splays her legs open in poses and videos that are seductive but thinly veiled as 'yoga' and is seeking to concoct an appearance as the ultimate MILF...next, she then conveniently gives herself a pass, for example, by flashing her breast and then putting her baby on it as if to say, "This is natural!" all the while smugly calling her critics haters. She populates her cringe inducing-seductive (in my opinion, disturbing, not sexy) and plentiful IG pics with her army of babies and by that act alone - instantly nullifies any scrutiny. If the babies weren't next to her, she'd be just another IG wanna-be using her sexuality for $$$ and views. ...I think it is gross because she knows she is milking (no pun intended) her MILF role and is obviously intent on erotically arousing her viewers while showing how 'hot' a mama she is. Her babies are there as objects to virtue-signal "motherlove" which is an attempt to render the critical viewer silent and strip them of the right to be critical, lest they say anything against her and be automatically shamed as a mother-hater or body-shamer. She's basically using the children, if you will, by strategically 'pimping' them to clean up her covert intent to be erotic. The babies are her money-makers that create her brand. They are the props. If she were truly showing motherhood, she would show it more realistically without the eroticized poses, skimpy lingerie and open crotch shots with legs spread with her face in her own butt. Can not agree more. This women has five children under 8 years old and she parades around like an adult film star. This has nothing to do with obtaining money, she wants to be seen. It must be killing her to be off Social Media. She probably can not function. |