Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only independent witness to this alleged crime says she is lying. So there is that.

Really? The head of the ralph club, videographer of girls eating oysters, and blackout drunk? That's your independent witness?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the White House is not standing by Kavanaugh. They provided "no comment" - normally, they would reaffirm support and claim the nominee did nothing wrong.

So if Trump isn't standing by him, why is anyone here standing by him?

Not an official statement, but per Politico:

A lawyer close to the White House said the nomination will not be withdrawn. “No way, not even a hint of it. If anything, it’s the opposite. If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”


Ok, so the suggestion is, every man has done this. Uh, no. Only in GOP Trump World is this the case.

What is astonishing is this lawyer close to the white house is not arguing that it is not true, but that men need to stick up & defend this

Does this really surprise you?

This is classic conservative spin. Everyone questioning the character of the victim is a republican. They basically believe any BS their party feeds them. Everything is fake news and liberal lies.

While the WH might want to move forward, Kavanaugh will not. He won't put his family through this. They'll spin it to preserve his reputation, but they won't proceed with the Supreme Court nomination.

Here's a question for you: Why do you believe the 30+ year old, fuzzy recollection of ONE woman? Understandable if there were multiple accusations, but there is one. And it's from decades ago. At any time during Kavanaugh's career, she could have come forward. Why is it that you believe her over him?

because they want him gone

Trump should have nominated someone with a clean background

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

We all know it's not his background that's concerning liberals. You didn't want him in the first place, and you'll attack any conservative nominee.

Yes, its as if we created one set of rules for Dem presidential appointees, and another for Republican... oh wait, that's your boy McConnell.

I'll repeat; it's not his background that's your concern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only independent witness to this alleged crime says she is lying. So there is that.

Really? The head of the ralph club, videographer of girls eating oysters, and blackout drunk? That's your independent witness?

Okay. So, no witness. Just he said, she said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only independent witness to this alleged crime says she is lying. So there is that.

You mean the pervert who basically chronicled his alcoholism and kinks in a book and on social media? The guy who jumped on them and arguably was trying to get in on the action?

Pretty sure he has every reason to lie.

[Anonymous]

She’s an activist. Signed a letter against Trump re: border enforcement. Can’t wait to see more about her

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the White House is not standing by Kavanaugh. They provided "no comment" - normally, they would reaffirm support and claim the nominee did nothing wrong.

So if Trump isn't standing by him, why is anyone here standing by him?

Not an official statement, but per Politico:

A lawyer close to the White House said the nomination will not be withdrawn. “No way, not even a hint of it. If anything, it’s the opposite. If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”


Ok, so the suggestion is, every man has done this. Uh, no. Only in GOP Trump World is this the case.

What is astonishing is this lawyer close to the white house is not arguing that it is not true, but that men need to stick up & defend this

Does this really surprise you?

This is classic conservative spin. Everyone questioning the character of the victim is a republican. They basically believe any BS their party feeds them. Everything is fake news and liberal lies.

While the WH might want to move forward, Kavanaugh will not. He won't put his family through this. They'll spin it to preserve his reputation, but they won't proceed with the Supreme Court nomination.

Here's a question for you: Why do you believe the 30+ year old, fuzzy recollection of ONE woman? Understandable if there were multiple accusations, but there is one. And it's from decades ago. At any time during Kavanaugh's career, she could have come forward. Why is it that you believe her over him?

because they want him gone

Trump should have nominated someone with a clean background

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

We all know it's not his background that's concerning liberals. You didn't want him in the first place, and you'll attack any conservative nominee.

Yes, its as if we created one set of rules for Dem presidential appointees, and another for Republican... oh wait, that's your boy McConnell.

I'll repeat; it's not his background that's your concern.

there's plenty in his background that's of concern. but there are other threads about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the White House is not standing by Kavanaugh. They provided "no comment" - normally, they would reaffirm support and claim the nominee did nothing wrong.

So if Trump isn't standing by him, why is anyone here standing by him?

Not an official statement, but per Politico:

A lawyer close to the White House said the nomination will not be withdrawn. “No way, not even a hint of it. If anything, it’s the opposite. If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”


Ok, so the suggestion is, every man has done this. Uh, no. Only in GOP Trump World is this the case.

What is astonishing is this lawyer close to the white house is not arguing that it is not true, but that men need to stick up & defend this

Does this really surprise you?

This is classic conservative spin. Everyone questioning the character of the victim is a republican. They basically believe any BS their party feeds them. Everything is fake news and liberal lies.

While the WH might want to move forward, Kavanaugh will not. He won't put his family through this. They'll spin it to preserve his reputation, but they won't proceed with the Supreme Court nomination.

Here's a question for you: Why do you believe the 30+ year old, fuzzy recollection of ONE woman? Understandable if there were multiple accusations, but there is one. And it's from decades ago. At any time during Kavanaugh's career, she could have come forward. Why is it that you believe her over him?

because i know many, many women with stories like hers, and just as many men with a grab-ass excuse to justify what they did.

You think it's okay to destroy a person's reputation because you "know many, many women with stories like hers, and just as many men with a grab-ass excuse to justify what they did?" The point is that perhaps he's innocent. I can hardly believe your line of reasoning, and I'm a woman.

please. spare us your false indignance. his reputation is hardly at stake. if he isn't confirmed to the supreme court, his life goes on as usual.

No, his life won't go on as usual; and you know it. People on this thread are calling him a rapist. I'd say that's very harmful to a person's reputation.

oh please, he'll be just fine. he's a well connected white man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only independent witness to this alleged crime says she is lying. So there is that.

You mean the pervert who basically chronicled his alcoholism and kinks in a book and on social media? The guy who jumped on them and arguably was trying to get in on the action?

Pretty sure he has every reason to lie.

This Mark Judge guy might end up getting the worst of this when all is said and done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only independent witness to this alleged crime says she is lying. So there is that.

Really? The head of the ralph club, videographer of girls eating oysters, and blackout drunk? That's your independent witness?

Okay. So, no witness. Just he said, she said.

Yes, that's been the nature of rape cases for hundreds of years. It's only recently that we have men incriminating themselves with videos and selfies with the victim. Why would she lie? Her whole life and that of her family is going to get dragged through the mud.

[Anonymous]

I guess Kavanaugh wasn't kidding about growing up on the mean streets of Bethesda.

https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-too-grew-up-in-the-crime-ridden-streets-of-bethesda-maryland

“I’m a native of this area. I’m a native of an urban-suburban area. I grew up in a city plagued by gun violence and gang violence and drug violence.” – Judge Brett Kavanaugh, on the second day of his Senate hearings for his nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States"
- - -

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's also a research PSYCHOLOGIST.

Perhaps because she was PSYCHOLOGICALLY TRAUMATIZED.

I went through MUCH more than her and am not psychologically traumatized. Maybe because I DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT AT THE TIME. And I was younger than her.

And THAT makes you QUALIFIED to objectively JUDGE the actions and circumstances of OTHERS.

Glad you were able to come forward. Read this thread to see that many others did not/could not, and try to find some compassion and empathy to understand why.

Don’t whine 30 some odd years later

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only independent witness to this alleged crime says she is lying. So there is that.

Really? The head of the ralph club, videographer of girls eating oysters, and blackout drunk? That's your independent witness?

Well are we putting witnesses on trial? I am sure there are things in the accusers background that would discredit her. If you start down that path know where it will end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[

oh please, he'll be just fine. he's a well connected white man.

+1. He's neither white nor well connected. You have every right to feel shocked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the White House is not standing by Kavanaugh. They provided "no comment" - normally, they would reaffirm support and claim the nominee did nothing wrong.

So if Trump isn't standing by him, why is anyone here standing by him?

Not an official statement, but per Politico:

A lawyer close to the White House said the nomination will not be withdrawn. “No way, not even a hint of it. If anything, it’s the opposite. If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”


Ok, so the suggestion is, every man has done this. Uh, no. Only in GOP Trump World is this the case.

What is astonishing is this lawyer close to the white house is not arguing that it is not true, but that men need to stick up & defend this

Does this really surprise you?

This is classic conservative spin. Everyone questioning the character of the victim is a republican. They basically believe any BS their party feeds them. Everything is fake news and liberal lies.

While the WH might want to move forward, Kavanaugh will not. He won't put his family through this. They'll spin it to preserve his reputation, but they won't proceed with the Supreme Court nomination.

Here's a question for you: Why do you believe the 30+ year old, fuzzy recollection of ONE woman? Understandable if there were multiple accusations, but there is one. And it's from decades ago. At any time during Kavanaugh's career, she could have come forward. Why is it that you believe her over him?

because they want him gone

Trump should have nominated someone with a clean background

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

We all know it's not his background that's concerning liberals. You didn't want him in the first place, and you'll attack any conservative nominee.

Yes, its as if we created one set of rules for Dem presidential appointees, and another for Republican... oh wait, that's your boy McConnell.

I'll repeat; it's not his background that's your concern.

there's plenty in his background that's of concern. but there are other threads about that.

Since the day he was nominated, liberals have been trying desperately to find a reason not block his confirmation---and for no other reason than he's more conservative. They think they now have a way to successfully stop him. Perhaps they do, but it's not because they have concerns about his background. They don't like his political views.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only independent witness to this alleged crime says she is lying. So there is that.

Really? The head of the ralph club, videographer of girls eating oysters, and blackout drunk? That's your independent witness?

Well are we putting witnesses on trial? I am sure there are things in the accusers background that would discredit her. If you start down that path know where it will end.

Dirtbag rape apologists have been doing that to her this entire thread.