War with Iran

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any fifth-grader in the Middle East understands the basic equation: if Israel strikes Iranian energy infrastructure, Iran will retaliate by targeting the energy facilities of GCC countries. This raises the global economic cost dramatically.

Israel is well aware of this dynamic. By hitting Iran's energy sites, it effectively pressures—or even forces—the GCC countries to get involved in the war against Iran.

Even if they do not participate, their infrastructure becomes vulnerable and weakened.

In either scenario, Israel benefits: the GCC either joins the fight against Iran or suffers serious damage, reducing their regional influence and economic power. It's a win-win for Israel.

Exactly, that is why mossad agents were caught in Saudi Arabia and other GCC states commiting false flag attack on oil infrastructure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should read Ronen Bergman in Israel’s Hebrew press. Quite the change. He says Netanyahu has changed his stance and say Iran can not be defeated. Bibi said Iran is not a threat and we need to concentrate on our other wars which are not going well.

Israel bombed Iranian gas fields knowing full well that Iran would retaliate. They did this with the specific goal of blocking an off ramp for Trump.

Of course he did. Trump is his most useful idiot. W Bush is a close 2nd. Netanyahu patiently waited for and funded Trump.

For the non believers:
"9/11 attacks and the U.S. involvement in Iraq benefited Israel by swinging American public opinion in our favor." — Netanyahu

"It [9 11] would generate immediate sympathy and strengthen U.S. Israel ties, despite the tragedy." — Netanyahu

"Anti-war protesters in the U.S. are Iran’s useful idiots standing with evil." — Netanyahu

Netanyahu told the Nytimes on 9/11/01 that what happened was “very good thing” before clarifying his words.

https://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/12/us/day-terror-israelis-spilled-blood-seen-bond-that-draws-2-nations-closer.html

Here’s how The New York Times reported it:

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, “It’s very good.” Then he edited himself: “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.” He predicted that the attack would “strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we’ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.”

[Anonymous]

Then, in 2008, he also called 9/11 good for Israel.

According to reports in the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, Netanyahu said in 2008, "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq".

Can you imagine an American president saying 10/7 was very good?

[Anonymous]

'Extensive damage' from missile attacks, Qatar petroleum company says
Qatar's state-owned petroleum company says missiles have struck Ras Laffan Industrial City, an area with a major oil-processing site.
"Emergency response teams were deployed immediately to contain the resulting fires, as extensive damage has been caused," QatarEnergy wrote on social media.
All personnel are accounted for and there are no casualties at this time, the statement said.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c24d410m3g4t

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

'Extensive damage' from missile attacks, Qatar petroleum company says
Qatar's state-owned petroleum company says missiles have struck Ras Laffan Industrial City, an area with a major oil-processing site.
"Emergency response teams were deployed immediately to contain the resulting fires, as extensive damage has been caused," QatarEnergy wrote on social media.
All personnel are accounted for and there are no casualties at this time, the statement said.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c24d410m3g4t

Iran will have to hit the east west pipelines in the Saudi use. This would hurt Trump more vs LNG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Then, in 2008, he also called 9/11 good for Israel.

According to reports in the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, Netanyahu said in 2008, "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq".

Can you imagine an American president saying 10/7 was very good?

In 2028 yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Then, in 2008, he also called 9/11 good for Israel.

According to reports in the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, Netanyahu said in 2008, "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq".

Can you imagine an American president saying 10/7 was very good?

I can imagine a future president saying 10/7 happened because of the past 75 years the world chose to ignore and/or directly funded/defended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Then, in 2008, he also called 9/11 good for Israel.

According to reports in the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, Netanyahu said in 2008, "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq".

Can you imagine an American president saying 10/7 was very good?

No. But Trump will, for sure.
I’m 19:57. The quotes you posted are also true. Netanyahu recycles them over and over dating back to the Oslo Accords with subtle edits. I post them repeatedly in relevant threads.

Adding a much needed laugh. “I’m not naturally a manipulative person.” — Netanyahu

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I also think Hegseth will be blamed by Trump who always tries to evade responsibility. Instead of falling out with Israel, he will blame the drunks Lindsay Graham and Pete Hegseth for this escalation

Hegseth is absolutely getting thrown under the bus. And incidentally, Hegseth spent his day issuing a six page memo to all commanders on "Guidance on Grooming Standards for Facial Hair and Religious Liberty."

[Anonymous]

Extensive damage’ reported after Iran launches revenge attack on oil infrastructure in Qatar, Saudi Arabia
Iran launched a fierce attack on Persian Gulf oil and gas facilities Wednesday — hours after its gas field complex, the largest in the world, was hit by an Israeli airstrike.

Qatar’s state oil giant QatarEnergy said it suffered “extensive damage” at its Ras Laffan Industrial City after Iranian missiles hit the fuel plant.

“Emergency response teams were deployed immediately to contain the resulting fires,” the world’s second-largest liquefied natural gas exporter said in a statement. ⁠

https://nypost.com/2026/03/18/world-news/extensive-damage-reported-after-iran-launches-revenge-attack-on-oil-infrastructure-in-qatar-saudi-arabia/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then, in 2008, he also called 9/11 good for Israel.

According to reports in the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, Netanyahu said in 2008, "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq".

Can you imagine an American president saying 10/7 was very good?

No. But Trump will, for sure.
I’m 19:57. The quotes you posted are also true. Netanyahu recycles them over and over dating back to the Oslo Accords with subtle edits. I post them repeatedly in relevant threads.

Adding a much needed laugh. “I’m not naturally a manipulative person.” — Netanyahu

He also made these remarks recorded by a secret camera in 2001:

In a leaked video from 2001, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was recorded saying that "America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction". He also commented, "Don't worry about the Americans, we easily maneuver them"

In the recording, Netanyahu explained his plan to undermine the Oslo Accords, a framework for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, by using a loophole related to "military zones" to retain large portions of Palestinian territory. He described the then-U.S. President Bill Clinton as "radically pro-Palestinian"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should read Ronen Bergman in Israel’s Hebrew press. Quite the change. He says Netanyahu has changed his stance and say Iran can not be defeated. Bibi said Iran is not a threat and we need to concentrate on our other wars which are not going well.

Bibi is dead. His son was obviously observing shiva. 7 day absence from twitter.

Once the Israelis find out, the likud party is done

People who believe what Iranian media puts out are idiots.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2026/03/12/benjamin-netanyahu-dead-rumor/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should read Ronen Bergman in Israel’s Hebrew press. Quite the change. He says Netanyahu has changed his stance and say Iran can not be defeated. Bibi said Iran is not a threat and we need to concentrate on our other wars which are not going well.

Israel bombed Iranian gas fields knowing full well that Iran would retaliate. They did this with the specific goal of blocking an off ramp for Trump.

Qatar is pretty pissed off. They share the South Pars field with Iran. Israel is a rogue country. Word is Israel is signaling it is looking for away to end this and quickly.

Yes, Qatar is very pissed off - at Iran. As are all the Gulf States.

Qatar has called on Iran to immediately stop attacks on Gulf countries so a diplomatic solution could be sought to end the war with the United States and Israel, which has triggered a global energy crisis.

“Iran must stop the attacks immediately so that a diplomatic solution to the crisis can be found,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Majed al-Ansari said on Monday, adding that Tehran has targeted residential areas, energy sites and Hamad International Airport.

“Iran is attacking Gulf countries without any reason and must stop its attacks because we are outside the conflict,” the spokesman said during a news conference in the Qatari capital Doha.

Iran has been targeting US assets and civilian sites in Gulf countries since the US and Israel began bombing Iran on February 28.

Qatar and other Gulf states have been urging Iran to halt its attacks, with the Qatari envoy to the United Nations last week describing the assault as a violation of international law and the UN Charter.

“Stopping the attacks requires a decision from Iran’s foreign minister, and Qatar will defend itself,” he said. “Contacts are still ongoing with Gulf countries to ensure de-escalation and confront Iran’s attacks.”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/16/qatar-calls-on-iran-to-stop-gulf-attacks-urges-diplomatic-solution

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

'Extensive damage' from missile attacks, Qatar petroleum company says
Qatar's state-owned petroleum company says missiles have struck Ras Laffan Industrial City, an area with a major oil-processing site.
"Emergency response teams were deployed immediately to contain the resulting fires, as extensive damage has been caused," QatarEnergy wrote on social media.
All personnel are accounted for and there are no casualties at this time, the statement said.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c24d410m3g4t

Iran will have to hit the east west pipelines in the Saudi use. This would hurt Trump more vs LNG.

They did it. They warned that they would do it if Pars was attacked and after Israel attacked they sent a missile over to Yanbu.

I think this is the first time an Iran has ever targeted the Red Sea. My jaw is on the floor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/Jvnior/status/2034397129083437117

Mark Levin: “If you’re against the Iran war, you’re a ‘woke right neo-fascist’ and you’re no different than 1930s Weimar Germans.”

So you are a Nazi if you’re against war with Iran. This is coming from the people who control Trump.

LMAO, imagine thinking Zionists can ever redeem themselves. Violent, warmongering hogs. Every last one of them. The "liberal" ones are just as violent, they just hate that everyone found out how bloodthirsty Israel has always been.

I would say the fanatical mullahs and ayatollahs who rule Iran are violent, warmongering hogs and have been for decades. Every last one of them. Wouldn't you agree?
DP